Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:23:25.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Muslim South in the Context of the Thai Nation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Robert B. Albritton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The years since 2004 have been marked by a level of insurgency in the southern region of Thailand unknown for decades. An accurate perspective on this conflict requires a deeper understanding of differences between the Buddhist and Muslim Thais of the region than has been evident in public and academic discourse. This study utilizes data from a survey taken in 2006, of attitudes and political orientations across all regions of Thailand, including an independent sample of the southern region. The data indicate that southerners are different from the rest of Thailand, whether Buddhist or Muslim; that Malay-speaking Muslims are different from other Muslims; and that sympathy for the insurgency lies not in religion, but in defending practices associated with loyalty to specific forms of Malay culture that characterize the region.

Keywords

cultural assimilationinsurgencyMalay identitysocial cleavagessouthern Thailandunconventional participation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 2010 , pp. 61 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Abuza, Zachary. 2003. Militant Islam in Southeast Asia: Crucible of Terror. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aeosrivongse, Nithi. 2005. “Understanding the Situation in the South as a ‘Millenarian Revolt.”’ Kyoto Review (March). http://kyotoreview.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp/issue/issue5/article380.Google Scholar
Albritton, Robert B., and Prabudhanitisarn, Sidhinat. 1997. “Culture, Region, and Thai Political Diversity.” Asian Studies Review 21: 61–82.Google Scholar
Albritton, Robert B., Gothamasan, Phan-ngam, Jaisai, Noree, Jitpoosa, Manop, Nilchang, Sunandpattira, and Sa-idi, Arin. 1996. “Electoral Participation by Southern Thai Buddhists and Muslims.” South East Asia Research 4: 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjomand, S. 1995. “Unity and Diversity in Islamic Fundamentalism.” In Fundamentalism Comprehended , ed. Marty, Martin and Appleby, R. S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Askew, Marc. 2007. Conspiracy Politics and a Disorderly Border: The Struggle to Comprehend Insurgency in Thailand's Deep South. Washington, DC: East-West Center.Google Scholar
Jitpiromsri, Srisompob, and Sobhonvasu, Panyasak. 2005. “Quandary of the Deep South's Conflicts: Structural or Ideological Determinants.” Unpublished paper presented at the International Conference on Thai Studies, DeKalb, IL.Google Scholar
Komin, Suntaree. 1991. Psychology of the Thai People: Values and Behavioral Patterns. Bangkok: National Institute of Development Administration.Google Scholar
Krueger, Alan B., and Maleckova, Jitka. 2002. “Education, Poverty, Political Violence, and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?” Charles University, Working Papers, Research Program in Developmental Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, May 2002, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2008. Tearing Apart the Land: Islam and Legitimacy in Southern Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2009a. “Thai Buddhism, Thai Buddhists, and the Southern Conflict.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40, 1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2009b. “The Politics of Buddhist Identity in Thailand's Deep South: The Demise of Civil Religion.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40, 1: 11–32.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 2001. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34: 30–62.Google Scholar
Satha-Anand, Chaiwat. 2005. “The Silence of the Bullet Monument: Violence and ‘Truth’ Management, Dusun-nyor 1948 and ‘Kru-Ze’ 2004.” Keynote address at the International Conference on Thai Studies, DeKalb, IL.Google Scholar
Simon, Steven, and Benjamin, Daniel. 2001. “The Terror.” Survival 43, 4: 5–18.Google Scholar
Syukri, Ibrahim. 2005. History of the Malay Kingdom of Patani. Bangkok: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Tessler, Mark. 2002. “Islam and Democracy in the Middle East: The Impact of Religious Orientations on Attitudes Toward Democracy in Four Arab Countries.” Comparative Politics 34: 337–354.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman. 1972. Political Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, Karen. 2002. “The Roots of Terrorism: Probing the Myths.” The Political Quarterly 73, Supplemental: 25–39.Google Scholar