Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:08:30.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Japan's High-Technology Trade with China and Its Export Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Tomoo Marukawa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While Japanese business interests support the export of high-technology items and the transfer of technology from Japan to China, these economically motivated actions may have direct and indirect impacts on Japan's national security. First, the transfer of dual-use technology to China may directly help China's military buildup. Second, high-tech exports and technology transfers may have an indirect effect by eroding Japan's technological advantages vis-à-vis China. In this article I place these concerns into a historical context and analyze the current challenges to Japan's export control policies. I offer an overview of the Japan-China trade relationship, with a special focus on high-tech trade. I then discuss changes in Japan's export controls regarding China, based on heightened security concerns. Evidence indicates that the Japanese government is ill equipped to deal with “technology leakage,” which is accelerating the erosion of Japan's technological supremacy and is not covered by its current export control regime.

Keywords

export controlJapanChinahigh technologydual-use technologytechnology transfertechnology leakage
Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 483 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Chinworth, Michael. 2004. “Tōshiba kikai jiken no saikentō” [The Toshiba machinery incident revisited]. Kokusai anzen hoshō 32, 2: 99–118.Google Scholar
Development Bank of Japan. 2012. “Nihon no monozukuri o sasaeru kanagata sangyō no kadai” [The problems of the die and mold industry which supports Japanese manufacturing]. Kongetsu no topikkusu 179. www.dbj.jp/reportshift/topics (accessed June 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Fukao, Kyoji, Ishido, Hikari, and Ito, Keiko. 2003. “Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 17, 4: 468–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Keitarō. 1987. “Koritsuka o maneku ‘seiji wa seiji, shōbai wa shōbai’ rosen” [The attitude to separate politics and business will lead us to isolation]. Kakushin 206: 10–14.Google Scholar
Hu, Qili. 2001. Zhongguo xinxihua de tansuo yu shijian [The quest and practice for China's information society]. Beijing: Dianzi gongye chubanshe.Google Scholar
Katō, Yōko. 1992. Amerika no sekai senryaku to kokomu: 1945-1992 [US global strategy and COCOM: 1945–1992]. Tokyo: Yushindō kōbunsha.Google Scholar
Kojima, Sueo. 2012a. “Nicchū chōki bōeki torikime no teikeitsu” [The conclusion of the Japan-China long-term trade agreement]. In Nicchū kankei shi: 1972-2012 II Keizai [A history of Japan-China relations: 1972-2012 II Economy], ed. Hattori, K.and Marukawa, T., 71–78. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kojima, Sueo. 2012b. “Puranto keiyaku mondai” [The plant contract issue]. In Nicchū kankei shi: 1972-2012 II Keizai [A history of Japan-China relations: 1972-2012 II Economy], ed. Hattori, K.and Marukawa, T., 121–128. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Nishii, Yasuyuki. 1990. “‘Kokomu byō’ wazurau nihon kabushiki gaisha” [The Japan Inc. suffering from ‘COCOM disease’]. Asahi Journal 32, 9: 29–31.Google Scholar
Satō, Heigo. 2000. “Kokomu kara wassenā e” [From COCOM to Wassenaar]. Hitotsubashi ronsō 123, 1: 114–130.Google Scholar
Sekiyama, Takashi. 2012. “Taichū ODA no kaishi” [The beginning of ODA to China]. In Nicchū kankei shi: 1972-2012 II Keizai [A history of Japan-China relations: 1972-2012 II Economy], ed. Hattori, K.and Marukawa, T., 105–119. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
State Council Information Office, People's Republic of China. 2012. Zhongguo de xitu zhuangkuang yu duice [The status of China's rare earths and policy]. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Timothy J. 2002. “Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11, 3: 451–496.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Tatsujirō, Tadokoro, Masayuki, Shiroyama, Hideaki, Aoki, Setsuko, and Kuzumi, Ryōko. 2004. “Nihon no anzen hoshō bōeki kanri” [Japan's security trade governance]. Kokusai anzen hoshō 32, 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Taguchi, Naoki. 2011. Sangyō gijutsu kyōsōryoku to kanagata sangyō [Industrial and technological competitiveness and the die and mold industry]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobō.Google Scholar
Wang, Junzhi. 2011. Zhongguo xitu baowei zhan [The war for protecting China's rare earths]. Beijing: Zhongguo jingji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wrubel, Wende A. 1989. “The Toshiba-Kongsberg Incident: Shortcomings of COCOM, and Recommendations for Increased Effectiveness of Export Controls to the East Bloc.” American University International Law Review 4, 1: 241–273.Google Scholar
Yasuhara, Yoko. 1986. “Japan, Communist China, and Export Controls in Asia: 1948-52.” Diplomatic History 10, 1: 75–89.Google Scholar
Yomiuri shimbun chūbu shakaibu. 2002. Umi o wataru shinkansen [The export of Shinkansen]. Tokyo: Chūō kōron shinsha.Google Scholar