Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:33:33.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Japan Under the DPJ: The Paradox of Political Change Without Policy Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 2009, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) brought an end to the long reign of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). However, despite high expectations, this politically transformative event has not unleashed significant policy change in Japan. We highlight five electoral factors that have acted as important constraints on policy change under DPJ rule. First, majoritarian electoral rules have led to a convergence in the policy positions of the two major political parties. Second, as the parties' policy positions have become more similar, voters have increasingly cast ballots based on “valence” (i.e., nonpolicy) evaluations. Third, large national vote swings have limited the tenure of young, inexperienced candidates who might otherwise serve as the instigators of reform. Fourth, Japan's electoral rules permit inconsistency across policy positions within parties and discourage greater policy coherence. Fifth, the continuing influence of rural regions has limited the scope of policy reform under the DPJ.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Bawn, Kathleen, and Thies, Michael F.. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized Under PR, Plurality and Mixed-member Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, 1: 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Thies, Michael. 1999. “Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's LDR.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Koning, Philippe, and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. 2011. “Resilience or Retrenchment? Japanese Security in the Era of Fiscal Austerity.” Working Paper, Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Green, Michael. 2010. “Japan's Confused Revolution.” Washington Quarterly 33, 1: 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Tobias. 2011. “Administrative Reform Under the DPJ: Progress and Problems in Building a Westminster System.” Paper presented at the Political Change in Japan Conference, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo. 2006. “Electoral Systems, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japan's Electoral Reforms.” World Politics 59, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iinuma, Yoshisuke. 2009. “Koizumi Says DPJ Is Party of Reform; Hatoyama: I'm No Puppet.” Oriental Economist 77, 10: 67.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan.” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States , ed. Cowhey, P. F. and McCubbins, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Aurelia George. 2012. “A New Ozawa Party for Japan?” www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/05/12/a-new-ozawa-party-for-japan.Google Scholar
Noble, Gregory W. 2010. “The Decline of Particularism in Japanese Politics.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10, 2: 239273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 2010. “Between Pork and Productivity: The Collapse of the Liberal Democratic Party.” Journal of Japanese Studies 36: 227254.Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, Slapin, Jonathan B., and Thies, Michael. 2011. “Party System Dynamics in Post-war Japan: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Electoral Pledges.” Electoral Studies 30, 1: 114124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1993. Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., McElwain, Kenneth Mori, and Shimizu, Kay. 2009. Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms. Stanford: Shorenstein APARC.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan, and Thies, Michael F.. 2012. “The End of LDP Dominance and the Rise of Party-oriented Politics in Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 38, 2: 353375.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1989. Financial Politics in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, McCubbins, Mathew, Saito, Jun, and Yamada, Kyohei. 2009. “Median Districts and District Medians: Electoral Adaptation to Majoritarian Politics in Post-1994 Japan.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Thies, Michael F.. 2010. Japan Transformed: Political Change and Economic Restructuring. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakakibara, Eisuke. 1991. “The Japanese Politico-Economic System and the Public Sector.” In Parallel Politics: Economic Policymaking in the United States and Japan , ed. Kernell, S.. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Akira. 2011. “Big Bang: Conservative Merger Expected from Political Supernova.” Asahi Shimbun Weekly Aera , March 2.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-party Dominant State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sneider, Daniel. 2011. “The New Asianism: Japanese Foreign Policy Under the Democratic Party of Japan.” Asia Policy 12 (July).Google Scholar