Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:23:19.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Measure of Decentralization for Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Sarah Shair-Rosenfield ,
Gary Marks  and
Liesbet Hooghe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we set out a fine-grained measure of the formal authority of intermediate subnational government for Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, and Thailand that is designed to be a flexible tool in the hands of researchers and policymakers. It improves on prior measures by providing annual estimates across ten dimensions of regional authority; it disaggregates to the level of the individual region; and it examines individual regional tiers, asymmetric regions, and regions with special arrangements. We use the measure and its elements to summarize six decades of regional governance in Southeast Asia and conclude by noting how the Regional Authority index could further the dialogue between theory and empirics in the study of decentralization and democratization.

Keywords

decentralizationregionsmultilevel governancemeasurementIndonesiaMalaysiaPhilippinesSouth KoreaThailand
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 85 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arzaghi, Mohammad, and Vernon Henderson, J.. 2005. “Why Countries Are Fiscally Decentralizing.” Journal of Public Economics 89: 1157–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Granado, Arze, Javier, F., Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and McNab, Robert M.. 2012. “Decentralization and the Composition of Public Expenditures.” International Studies Program Working Papers 05–01. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Bae, Yooil. 2007. “State Restructuring and Pathways to Local Democracy: The Politics of Decentralization in Japan and Korea.” PhD diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2002. “The Import of Institutions.” Journal of Democracy 13, 2: 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Jacques. 2007. “Indonesia's Quasi-Federalist Approach: Accommodation amid Strong Integrationist Tendencies.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5: 576–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Jacques. 2010. “The Double-Edged Sword of Autonomy in Indonesia and the Philippines.” In Multination States in Asia: Accommodation or Resistance, ed. Bertrand, Jacques and Laliberté, André, 164–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, Richard, and Vaillancourt, François, eds. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin, and Shah, Anwar. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. “Decentralization: Fueling or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?” International Organization 60: 651–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Yoo-Sung, and Wright, Deil. 2004. “Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) in Korea and Japan: Phases, Patterns, and Progress Toward Decentralization (Local Autonomy) in a Trans-Pacific Context.” International Review of Public Administration 9, 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daughters, Robert, and Harper, Leslie. 2007. “Fiscal and Political Decentralization Reforms.” In The State of State Reform in Latin America, ed. Lora, Eduardo, 185–213. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Tsalik, Svetlana. 1999. “Size and Democracy: The Case for Decentralization.” In Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation, ed. Diamond, Larry, 117–160. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Díaz-López, César. 1981. “The State of the Autonomic Process in Spain.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 11: 193–217.Google Scholar
Dziobek, Claudia, Mangas, Carlos Gutierrez, and Kufa, Phebby. 2010. Measuring Fiscal Decentralization—Exploring the IMF's Databases. IMF Working Paper WP/11/126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2001. “Political Obstacles to Decentralization: Evidence from Argentina and the Philippines.” Development and Change 32, 1: 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent, Kaiser, Kai, and Smoke, Paul. 2010. The Political Economy of Decentralization Reforms: Implications for Aid Effectiveness. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, Maria. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization and Federalism in Latin America.” Publius 31, 4: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2005. “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 99, 3: 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2011. “Varieties of Authoritarianism: The Organization of the Military State and Its Effect on Federalism in Argentina and Brazil.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46, 2: 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000. “The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America.” In Decentralization and Accountability of the Public Sector, ed. Burki, Shahid Javed and Perry, Guillermo E., 33–44. Annual World Bank Conference on Development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Harbers, Imke. 2010. “Decentralization and the Development of Nationalized Party Systems in New Democracies: Evidence from Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 43: 606–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2006. “Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Rise of Thai Rak Thai.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6: 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, Bert, and Kaiser, Kai. 2002. “The Making of the Big Bang and Its Aftermath: A Political Economy Perspective.” Paper presented at “Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia?” Georgia State University, May 1–3.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2013. “Beyond Federalism: Estimating and Explaining the Territorial Structure of Government.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43, 2: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Schakel, Arjan H.. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, Osterkatz, Sandra Chapman, Niedzwiecki, Sara, Schakel, Arjan H., and Shair-Rosenfield, Sarah. Forthcoming. Multilevel Governance Below the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkin, Jonathan. 2009. “Party Matters: Devolution and Party Politics in Britain and Spain.” Party Politics 15: 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, Charlie, and Schakel, Arjan H.. 2013. “Insights: Methods and Data Beyond Methodological Nationalism.” Regional Studies 47, 3: 402–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Michael. 1998. The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inquiry in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik. 2008. “The Paradox of Thailand's 1997 ‘Peoples’ Constitution': Be Careful What You Wish For.” Asian Survey 48: 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Thomas D. 1999. “Complex Self-Identification and Compounded Representation in Federal Systems.” West European Politics 22, 2: 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik, and Ersson, Svente. 1999. Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1991. “Constitutional Choices for New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 2, 1: 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Gary. 2007. “Triangulation and the Square Root Law.” Electoral Studies 26, 1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Gary, Hooghe, Liesbet, and Schakel, Arjan H.. 2008. “Measuring Regional Authority.” Regional and Federal Studies 18, 2–3: 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted. 2011. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2011. Version p4v2011 [Computer File]. Center for Systemic Research's Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research. www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm.Google Scholar
Martinez-Vasquez, Jorge. 2011. Fiscal Decentralization in Asia: Challenges and Opportunities. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P., and Samuels, David, eds. 2004. Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Luis. 1997. “Federalization and Ethnoterritorial Concurrence in Spain.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27, 4: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutebi, Alexander M. 2004. “Recentralising While Decentralising: Centre-Local Relations and ‘CEO’ Governors in Thailand.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 26: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 1997. “Federalism and Constitutional Design.” Journal of Democracy 8, 1: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 2010. “Revolutionary State Formation and the Unitary Republic of Indonesia.” In Multination States in Asia: Accommodation or Resistance, ed. Bertrand, Jacques and Laliberté, André, 29–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, Benjamin. 2007. “Democratization and Electoral Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region: Is There an ‘Asian Model’ of Democracy?” Comparative Political Studies 40, 11: 1350–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics 36: 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schakel, Arjan H. 2008. “Validation of the Regional Authority Index.” Regional and Federal Studies 18, 2–3: 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. 2003. “Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Anwar, ed. 2007. The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives. London: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorens, Jason. 2011. “The Institutions of Fiscal Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41, 2: 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1999. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” Journal of Democracy 10, 4: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, Linz, Juan J., and Yadav, Yogendra. 2011. Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter-Minassian, Teresa. 1997. Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh, Tadjoeddin, Mohammad Zulfan, and Panggabean, Rizal. 2008. “Creating Datasets in Information-Poor Environments: Patterns of Collective Violence in Indonesia, 1990–2003.” Journal of East Asian Studies 8: 361–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1997 [1947]. Theory of Social and Economic Organization (reprint). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Eliza, Garman, Christopher, and Haggard, Stephan. 1999. “Decentralization in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 34, 1: 7–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, and Schiller, Nina Glick. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2, 4: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woldendorp, Jaap, Keman, Hans, and Budge, Ian. 2000. Party Government in 28 Democracies (1945–1998): Composition—Duration—Personnel. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woldendorp, Jaap, Keman, Hans, and Budge, Ian. 2005. East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar