Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:24:17.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Definitions of Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century East Asia: Japan and Korea Between China and the West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Seo-Hyun Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The arrival of Westphalian sovereignty principles in nineteenth-century East Asia was not a uniformly transformative “shock” as commonly assumed. The Sino-centric order did not suddenly disappear; rather it lingered and evolved in a gradual and contested process of change. I argue that enduring domestic understandings of sovereign autonomy affected how Westphalian sovereignty was interpreted in Japan and Korea. Even as the regional structure shifted from regional hierarchy under China to a Western-led international state system, the lens of hierarchy—the long-standing sense of vulnerability and the need to attain autonomous status in a world of great powers—remained unchanged. In addition, each ruling regime in East Asia attempted to reconcile Westphalian sovereignty with existing diplomatic practices to protect its own interests within the Sino-centric order, which resulted in a new hybrid system of interstate relations encompassing notions of both equality and civilizational hierarchy. Within each country, contestation on sovereignty occurred in multiple stages, driven by existing security relationships and changing domestic politics debating the competing standards of civilization in the region.

Keywords

sovereigntySino-centric hierarchystandards of civilizationunequal treatiestributary statesJapanKoreaEast Asian order
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 2: Special Issue: International Relations and East Asian History: Impact, Meaning, and Conceptualization , August 2013 , pp. 281 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barkin, Samuel J., and Cronin, Bruce. 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Organization 48, 1: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J., and Weber, Cynthia. 1996. “The Social Construction of State Sovereignty.” In State Sovereignty as Social Construct, ed. Biersteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia, 1–21. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cassel, Pär Kristoffer. 2012. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Frederick Foo. 1967. The Opening of Korea: A Study of Chinese Diplomacy, 1876–1885. Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Dong-hi. 1993. “1880 nyŏndae Chosŏn ŭi munje wa kumiyŏlkang kwa ŭi oigyokwankye” [Issues in foreign relations with the Western powers in 1880s Chosŏn]. In Hankuk oigyosa [The history of Korea's foreign relations], ed. Hankuk jŏngchi oikyosa hakhoi [The Korean Diplomatic History Association], 125–144. Seoul: Chipmundang.Google Scholar
Chung, Yong-hwa. 2003. “Chŏnhwanki chaju oikyo ŭi kaenyŏm kwa chokŏn: 19 segi mal Chosŏn ŭi dae Chŏng oikyo ŭi ironchŏk kochal” [The concept and conditions of autonomous diplomacy in a period of transition: Theoretical review of Korean diplomacy to Qing China during the late 19th century]. Kukche chŏngchi nonchong 43, 2: 201–220.Google Scholar
Chung, Yong-hwa. 2004a. “Kŭndae Hanguk-ŭi jukwŏn kaenyŏm ŭi suyong kwa jŏkyong” [The adoption and application of the sovereignty concept in modern Korea]. Segye jongchi [World Politics] 25, 1: 51–52.Google Scholar
Chung, Yong-hwa. 2004b. Munmyŏng ŭi jŏngchi sasang: Yu Kilchun kwa kŭndae Hanguk [The political ideology of civilization: Yu Kilchun and modern Korea]. Seoul: Munhak kwa jisŏngsa.Google Scholar
Craig, Albert M. 1986. “The Central Government.” In Japan in Transition: From Tokugawa to Meiji, ed. Jansen, Marius B. and Rozman, Gilbert, 36–67. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Albert M. 2009. Civilization and Enlightenment: The Early Thought of Fukuzawa Yukichi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Deuchler, Martina. 1977. Confucian Gentlemen and Barbarian Envoys: The Opening of Korea, 1875–1885. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Dudden, Alexis. 1999. “Japan's Engagement with International Terms.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, ed. Liu, Lydia, 165–191. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudden, Alexis. 2006. Japan's Colonization of Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, Joshua A. 1995. “The Sino-Japanese Controversy over Shina as a Toponym for China.” In The Cultural Dimensions of Sino-Japanese Relations: Essays on the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, 66–78. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Michio. 1977. “Japan's Changing View of Asia.” Japan Quarterly 24, 4: 423–431.Google Scholar
Gluck, Carol. 1985. Japan's Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984a. “China's Entry into International Society.” In The Expansion of International Society, ed. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 171–183. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984b. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ha, Young-sun. 2009. “Kŭndae Han'guk ŭi munmyŏng kaenyŏm toipsa” [A history of the introduction of the concept of civilization in modern Korea]. In Kŭndae Han'guk ŭi sahoe kwahak kaenyŏm hyŏngsŏngsa [A history of the formation of social science concepts in modern Korea], ed. Ha, Young-sun et al., 36–65. Seoul: Changbi Publishers.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. 1997. “The Intra-Regional System in East Asia in Modern Times.” In Network Power: Japan and Asia, ed. Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, 113–135. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. 2003. “Tribute and Treaties: Maritime Asia and Treaty Port Networks in the Era of Negotiation, 1800–1900.” In The Resurgence of East Asia: 500, 150 and 50 Year Perspectives, ed. Arrighi, Giovanni, Hamashita, Takeshi, and Selden, Mark, 17–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hane, Mikiso. 1969. “The Sources of English Liberal Concepts in Early Meiji Japan.” Monumenta Nipponica 24, 3: 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevia, James. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Howland, Douglas R. 2002. Translating the West: Language and Political Reason in Nineteenth-Century Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Howland, Douglas R. 2004. “‘On the Benefits of Foreign Relations with China’: A New Development in Fukuzawa Yukichi's Theory of Civilization.” In Late Qing China and Meiji Japan: Political and Cultural Aspects, ed. Fogel, Joshua A., 21–38. Norwalk, CT: EastBridge.Google Scholar
Hsu, Immanuel. 1960. China's Entrance into the Family of Nations—The Diplomatic Phase, 1860–1880. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, In K. 1978. The Korean Reform Movement of the 1880s. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Iriye, Akira. 1989. “Japan's Drive to Great-Power Status.” In The Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 5: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Jansen, Marius B., 721–782. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marius B. 1968. “Tokugawa and Modern Japan.” In Studies in the Institutional History of Early Modern Japan, ed. Hall, John W. and Jansen, Marius B., 317–330. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2008. China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C., and Acharya, Amitav. 2011. “Beyond ‘China Without Neighbors’: Conceptualizing East Asian Historical International Relations.” Paper presented at the conference “Was There a Historical East Asian International System?” Korea Studies Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, March 4–5.Google Scholar
Kang, Dongkook. 2004. “‘Zokuhou’ no seiji sisousi: 19 seikigo ni okeru ‘Chousen tii mondai’ wo meguru gensetsu no keifu” [The political history of Zokuhou: The discourse on the “Choson problem” in the late 19th century].” PhD diss., University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Kang, Jae-ŏn. 1994. Sŏyang kwa Chosŏn: kŭ yimunhwa kyŏktu ŭi yŏksa [The West and Chosŏn Korea: A history of the clash between civilizations]. Seoul: Hakgojae.Google Scholar
Kang, Jae-eun. 2003. The Land of Scholars: Two Thousand Years of Korean Confucianism. Paramus, NJ: Noma and Sekye Books.Google Scholar
Karl, Rebecca E. 2002. Staging the World: Chinese Nationalism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. “Conclusion: National Security in a Changing World.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Katzenstein, Peter J., 498–537. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Donald. 1971. “The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–95 and Its Cultural Effects in Japan.” In Tradition and Modernization in Japanese Culture, ed. Shively, Donald H., 121–175. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, , Eugene, C. I., and Kim, Han-Kyo. 1967. Korea and the Politics of Imperialism, 1876–1910. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Key-Hiuk. 1980. The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order: Korea, Japan, and the Chinese Empire, 1860–1882. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Yongkoo. 1997. Sekyekwan chungdol ŭi kukche chŏngchihak: tongyang ye wa sŏyang kongbŏp [The international politics of the clash of worldviews: Eastern principles and Western law]. Seoul: Nanam.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 2001a. “Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1: 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 2001b. “Problematic Sovereignty.” In Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, ed. Krasner, Stephen D., 1–23. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Dai Yeol. 1988. “Tongsŏyang kukche chilsŏkwan ŭi chungdol kwa saeroun jilsŏkwan ŭi hyŏngsŏng” [Clash of Eastern and Western views of the international order and the formation of a new worldview]. Kukje-jongchi nonchong 28, 1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2010. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Kirk. 2000. “From Suzerainty to Commerce: Sino-Korean Economic and Business Relations During the Open Port Period (1876–1910).” PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Larsen, Kirk. 2008. Tradition, Treaties, and Trade: Qing Imperialism and Choson Korea, 1850–1910. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Motegi, Toshio. 2012. “Modes of Narrating the History of Sino-Japanese Relations: The Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century (translated by Matthew Fraleigh).” In Toward a History Beyond Borders: Contentious Issues in Sino-Japanese Relations, ed. Yang, Daqing, Liu, Jie, Mitani, Hiroshi, and Gordon, Andrew, 20–52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Najita, Tetsuo. 1985. “Conceptual Consciousness in the Meiji Ishin.” In Meiji Ishin: Restoration and Revolution, ed. Nagai, Michio and Urrutia, Miguel, 83–99. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
Nelson, Frederick M. 1946. Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Seo-Hyun. 2009. “State Sovereignty and Security in Hierarchical East Asia: The Politics of Sovereign-Nationalism in Japan and Korea.” PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth B. 1989. “Meiji Conservatism.” In The Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 5: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Jansen, Marius B., 674–720. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth B. 2007. Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Ravina, Mark. 2005. “State-Making in Global Context: Japan in a World of Nation-States.” In The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State: Japan and China, ed. Fogel, Joshua A., 87–104. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47, 1: 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Andre. 2007. “Tributary Relations and the Qing-Chosŏn Frontier on Mount Paektu.” In The Chinese State at the Borders, ed. Lary, Diana, 126–149. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Wook-hee. 2009. “Kŭndae Han'guk ŭi chukwŏn kaenyŏm” [The concept of sovereignty in modern Korea]. In Kŭndae Hankuk ŭi sahoe kwahak kaenyŏm hyŏngsŏngsa [A history of the formation of social science concepts in modern Korea], ed. Ha, Young-sun et al., 125–148. Seoul: Changbi Publishers.Google Scholar
Shin, Yong-ha. 2000. Modern Korean History and Nationalism. Seoul: Jimoondang Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Stern, John Peter. 1979. The Japanese Interpretation of the “Law of Nations,” 1854–1874. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suganami, Hidemi. 1984. “Japan's Entry into International Society.” In The Expansion of International Society, ed. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 185–199. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2005. “Japan's Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 11, 1: 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Stefan. 1993. Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001. African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin. 1991. China in the International System, 1918–1920: The Middle Kingdom at the Periphery. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin. 2001. “System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations.” Review of International Studies 27: 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Fangyin. 2007. “The Role of Ideational and Material Factors in the Qing Dynasty Diplomatic Transformation.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 1, 3: 40–41.Google Scholar