Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:03:38.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changing Anatomy of Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Kati Suominen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent proliferation of regional trade agreements in the East Asian region can be seen as the most notable development in the region's trading panorama in recent years. Yet, very little is as yet understood about the anatomy of these agreements and, consequently, their full implications to the regional economy. This article strives to fill this gap by analyzing the structure of four dozen RTAs by their various key component parts, including tariff liberalization schedules, rules of origin, and competition policy, customs, investment, and services provisions. The results reveal that intra-Asian RTAs are generally quite rapidly liberalizing, with the exception of agriculture, but they are also quite thin in trade-related disciplines when compared with the more legalistic US trans-Pacific RTAs and those of Mexico and Chile. The proposed Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific would inherently be a construct of the political economy interests of these various constituent RTAs.

Keywords

regional trade agreements (RTAs)Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP)AsiaUnited Statestrade political economytariff liberalizationrules of origincompetition policycustomsinvestmentservices tradeagriculture
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 29 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, P., Antràs, P., and Helpman, Elhanan. 2006. “Negotiating Free Trade.” Mimeo. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2008. Emerging Asian Regionalism: A Partnership for Shared Prosperity. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, Evenett, Simon, and Low, Patrick. 2007. “Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralising Deeper RTA Commitments.” Paper presented at the conference “Multilateralising Regionalism,” Geneva, September 10–12.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” NBER Working Paper No. W4465. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. 2006. “Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5775. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred. 1995. “APEC: The Bogor Declaration and the Path Ahead.” APEC Working Paper Series, 95–1. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred. 1997. “Open Regionalism.” In Whither APEC: The Progress to Date and Agenda for the Future, ed. Fred Bergsten, C. Washington: Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred. 2007. “Toward a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific.” Paper presented at the conference “New Asia-Pacific Trade Initiatives,” Japan Economic Foundation and Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, November 27.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1993. “Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview.” In New Dimensions in Regional Integration, ed. de Melo, J. and Panagariya, A. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cadot, Olivier, Melo, Jaime de, and Olarreaga, Marcelo. 2001. “Can Regionalism Ease the Pain of Multilateral Trade Liberalization?” European Economic Review 45: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, Inkyo. 2008. “What Challenges for an East Asian FTA?” Paper prepared for the conference “Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism,” Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, September 18–19.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 2003. “Economic Interdependence and the Future of U.S. Chinese Relations.” In International Relations Theory and the Asia Pacific, ed. John Ikenberry, G. and Mastanduno, Michael, 323–352. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Corden, W. M. 1972. “Economies of Scale and Customs Union Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 80, 3: 465–475.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Alan, and Stern, Robert. 1994. “Multilateral Trade Negotiations and Preferential Trading Arrangements.” In Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, ed. Deardorff, Alan and Stern, Robert. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Freund, Caroline, and Ornelas, Emanuel. 2005. “Does Regionalism Help or Hinder Multilateralism? An Empirical Evaluation.” Paper presented at the conference “The Sequencing of Regional Economic Integration: Issues in the Breadth and Depth of Economic Integration in the Americas,” Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, September 9–10.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Harris, Jeremy, and Suominen, Kati. 2007. “Multilateralizing Rules of Origin.” Paper prepared for the conference “Multilateralizing Regionalism,” Geneva, September 10–12.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Robertson, Raymond. 2004. “From Distant Neighbors to Close Partners: FTAA and the Pattern of Trade.” In Integrating the Americas: FTAA and Beyond, ed. Estevadeordal, A., Rodrik, D., Taylor, A. M., and Velasco, A. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Shearer, Matthew, and Suominen, Kati. 2007. “Multilateralizing Regionalism in the Americas.” Paper prepared for the conference “Multilateralizing Regionalism,” Geneva, September 10–12.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Shearer, Matthew, and Suominen, Kati. 2008. “Regional Integration in the Americas: State of Play, Lessons, and Ways Forward.” Paper prepared for the conference “Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism,” Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, September 18–19.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Suominen, Kati. 2006a. “Mapping and Measuring Rules of Origin Around the World.” In The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements, ed. Cadot, Olivier, Estevadeordal, Antoni, Suwa-Eisenmann, Akiko, and Verdier, Thierry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Suominen, Kati. 2006b. “Trade Effects of Rules of Origin.” Mimeograph. Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Suominen, Kati. 2008. Gatekeepers of Global Commerce: Rules of Origin and International Economic Integration. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Suominen, Kati. 2009. Sovereign Remedy? Trade Agreements in a Globalizing World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Suominen, Kati, and Teh, Robert. 2009. Regional Rules in the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ethier, W. J. 1998. “Regionalism in a Multilateral World.” Journal of Political Economy 106, 6: 1214–1245.Google Scholar
Falvey, Rod, and Reed, Geoff. 2000. “Trade Liberalization and Technology Choice.” Review of International Economics 8, 3: 409–419.Google Scholar
Frankel, J. A., Stein, E. and Wei, S. 1997. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Freund, Caroline. 2000. “Multilateralism and the Endogenous Formation of Preferential Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Economics 52, 2: 359–376.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Schott, Jeffrey J. 2007. “Fitting Asia-Pacific Agreements into the WTO System.” Paper presented at the conference “Multilateralising Regionalism,” Geneva, September 10–12.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). 2002. Beyond Borders: The New Regionalism in Latin America: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 2002 Report. Washington, DC: IADB.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). 2006. “Market Access Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements.” Paper presented at the IDB/WTO conference “Regional Rules in the Global Trading System,” Washington, DC, July 26–27.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. 1965. “An Economic Theory of Protectionism, Tariff Bargaining, and the Formation of Customs Unions.” Journal of Political Economy 73: 256–283.Google Scholar
Kahler, M. 1995. International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Shiraishi, Takashi, eds. 1997. Network Power: Japan and Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kawai, Masahiro, and Wignaraja, Ganeshan. 2008. “The Asian Noodle Bowl: Is It Serious?” Paper prepared for the conference “Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism,” Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, September 18–19.Google Scholar
Kemp, M. C., and Wan, H. Y. Jr. 1976. “An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Unions.” Journal of International Economics 6: 95–98.Google Scholar
Krishna, Kala, and Krueger, Anne O. 1995. “Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection.” In New Directions in Trade Theory, ed. Deardorff, Alan, Levinsohn, James, and Stern, Robert. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. 1993. “Free Trade Agreements as Protectionist Devices: Rules of Origin.” National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 4352. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Limão, N. 2006. “Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US.” American Economic Review 96, 3: 896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limão, N., and Olarreaga, M. 2006. “Trade Preferences to Small Developing Countries and the Welfare Costs of Lost Multilateral Liberalization.” World Bank Economic Review 20, 2: 217–240.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. 1960. “The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey.” Economic Journal 70: 498–513.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Peter J. 2001. “Rules of Origin and Fragmentation of Trade.” In Global Production and Trade in East Asia, ed. Cheng, Leonard K. and Kierzkowski, Henryk. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Meade, J. 1955. The Theory of Customs Unions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mundell, R. A. 1964. “Tariff Preferences and the Terms of Trade.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 32: 1–13.Google Scholar
Ornelas, E. 2005. “Trade Creating Free Trade Areas and the Undermining of Multilateralism.” European Economic Review 49, 7: 1717–1735.Google Scholar
Oye, K. 1992. Economic Discrimination and Political Exchange: World Political Economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J., ed. 2005. Remapping East Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scollay, R. 2005. “Substantially All Trade: Which Definitions Are Fulfilled In Practice? An Empirical Investigation.” Report prepared for the Commonwealth Secretariat, APEC Study Center, University of Auckland, August 15.Google Scholar
Suominen, Kati. 2004. Rules of Origin in Global Commerce. PhD diss., University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1950. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Wei, S., and Frankel, J. A. 1995. “European Integration and the Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: The Economics and the Politics.” CIDER Working Paper No. C95-053, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar