Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:22:14.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BEYOND THEORETICAL DETERMINISM: EXPLORING THE COMPLEXITY OF POWER TRANSITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Book Reviews Roundtable
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blagden, David W., Levy, Jack S., and Thompson, William R.. 2011. “Correspondence: Sea Powers, Continental Powers, and Balancing Theory.” International Security 36 (2): 190202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Richard C., and Hass, Ryan. 2019. “The China Debate Is Here to Stay.” Washington: Brookings Institution. www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/03/04/the-china-debate-is-here-to-stay/.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office. 2015. “An Analysis of the Navy's Fiscal Year 2016 Shipbuilding Plan.” www.cbo.gov/publication/50926.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. 2019. “China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress.” RL33153.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L. 1987. “Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905.” Journal of Strategic Studies 10 (3): 331362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie. 2018. When Right Makes Might: Rising Powers and World Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher. 2008. “Security Studies and the Use of History: Neville Chamberlain's Grand Strategy Revisited.” Security Studies 17 (3): 397437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1985. “Theories of General War.” World Politics 37 (3): 344374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1987. “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War.” World Politics 40 (1): 82107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Paul K., and Parent, Joseph M.. 2018. Twilight of the Titans: Great Power Decline and Retrenchment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Evan S. 2019. “China Reacts: Assessing Beijing's Response to Trump's New China Strategy.China Leadership Monitor, Issue 59, March 1.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. 1994. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace.” International Security 19 (2): 87125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Levy, Jack S.. 2008. “Wishful Thinking or Buying Time? The Logic of British Appeasement in the 1930s.” International Security 33 (2): 148181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schake, Kori. 2017. Safe Passage: The Transition from British to American Hegemony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Adam. 2019. Innovation and National Security: Keeping Our Edge. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Shifrinson, Joshua R. 2018. Rising Titans, Falling Giants: How Great Powers Exploit Power Shifts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tunsjø, Øystein. 2018. The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yongping, Feng. 2006. “The Peaceful Transition of Power from the UK to the US.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 1 (1): 83108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar