Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T00:26:16.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Balancing the Checks: Thailand's Paralyzed Politics Post-1997

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Duncan McCargo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1997, following the twin transformations of economic meltdown and comprehensive constitutional changes, practically every area of Thailand's public sphere has undergone significant reordering. New checks and balances have been created, new institutions established, old institutions abolished and merged, and new rules of the electoral game put into place. A major new political party has emerged that currently dominates the parliament, civil society is flourishing, and dozens of mass protests are thriving all over the country. Yet beneath this veneer of change, the old Thailand is recognizably intact. Politicians of doubtful integrity still flourish; social cleavages are as evident as before; corruption is endemic and accountability weak; election results are contested and contentious; and the military, though lying low, retains an inordinate number of privileges. Despite the reform process, the Thai political system remains in a feeble state; new institutions designed to improve the functioning of the parliamentary and party political orders have thus far failed to change the rules of the game.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 129 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Laothamatas, Anek. 1996. “A Tale of Two Democracies: Conflicting Perceptions of Elections and Democracy in Thailand.” In Taylor, R. H., ed., The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University, pp. 201–223.Google Scholar
Beetham, David. 1994. “Conditions for Democratic Consolidation.” Review of African Political Economy 69: 157–172.Google Scholar
Blaug, Ricardo. 2002. “Engineering Democracy.” Political Studies 50(1): 102–116.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. 1993. “The Discourse of Democracy in Thailand.” Asian Review 7: 126–170.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. 2000. Pollwatching, Elections, and Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A., and McCargo, Duncan. 1996. “Vote-Buying in Thailand's Northeast: The July 1995 General Election.” Asian Survey 36(4): 376–392.Google Scholar
Samudavanija, Chai-Anan. 1997. “Old Soldiers Never Die, They Are Just Bypassed: The Military, Bureaucracy, and Globalisation.” In Hewison, Kevin, ed., Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London: Routledge, pp. 42–57.Google Scholar
Crispin, Shawn. 2000. “Thailand: Uncivil Society.” Far Eastern Economic Review, August 31.Google Scholar
Crispin, Shawn. 2001. “Thailand: Defence Chiefs March Out of Step.” Far Eastern Economic Review, September 13.Google Scholar
Di Palma, Guiseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lertchoosakul, Kanokrat. 2002. “Conceptualising the Roles and Limitations of NGOS in the Anti-Pak Mun Dam Movement.” Nakhon Phanom: Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Thai Studies, January 9–12.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 2002. “Migrants and Protestors: Development in Northeast Thailand.” Nakhon Phanom: Keynote lecture at the Eighth International Conference on Thai Studies, January 9–12.Google Scholar
Suwannathat-Pian, Kobkua. 2002. “The Monarchy and Constitutional Change Since 1972.” In McCargo, Duncan, ed., Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 1997a. Chamlong Srimuang and the New Thai Politics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 1997b. “Thailand's Political Parties: Real, Authentic, and Actual.” In Hewison, Kevin, ed., Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London: Routledge, pp. 114–131.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 1998. “Alternative Meanings of Political Reform in Contemporary Thailand.” Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13: 5–30.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2000. Politics and the Press in Thailand. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. ed. 2002. Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
McVey, Ruth, ed. 2000. Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Thabchumpon, Naruemon. 1999. “Thailand: A Year of Diminishing Expectations.” In Southeast Asian Affairs, 1999. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael H. 2002. “Thailand's House Elections of 6 Jan. 2001: Thaksin's Landslide Victory and Subsequent Narrow Escape.” In Nelson, Michael H., ed., Thailand's New Politics: KPI Yearbook, 2001. Bangkok: White Lotus, pp. 283–441.Google Scholar
Ockey, James. 2001. “Thailand: The Struggle to Redefine Civil-Military Relations.” In Alagappa, Muthiah, ed., Coercion and Governance: The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Chris. Forthcoming. “Billionairism: Thaksin and Popular Politics in Post-Crisis Thailand.” In Hedman, Eva-Lotta and Sidel, John, eds., Populism in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Southeast Asia Program, Yale University.Google Scholar
Potter, David. 1997. “Explaining Democratization.” In Potter, David et al., eds., Democratization. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Robertson, Philip S. 1996. “The Rise of the Rural Network Politician: Will Thailand's New Elite Endure?” Asian Survey 36(9): 924–941.Google Scholar
Phatarathananunth, Somchai. 2001. “Civil Society in Northeast Thailand: The Case of the Small Scale Farmers Assembly of Isan.” Ph.D. diss., University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Tasker, Rodney. 1995. “Royal Frown: King Casts a Rare Political Barb.” Far Eastern Economic Review, August 31.Google Scholar
Pathmanand, Ukrist. 1998. “The Thaksin Shinawatra Group: A Study of the Relationship Between Money and Politics in Thailand.” Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13: 60–81.Google Scholar