Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:03:59.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Japanese and Jurchens in Tribute Systems in Early Chosòn Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Kenneth R. Robinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries the Chosòn Korea government designed and utilized hierarchical tribute systems for managing interactions, in particular, trade, with Japanese and Jurchen elites. Korean officials separated maritime and overland contacts, divided the contacts further into carefully delineated reception grades and diplomatic statuses, and designed detailed procedures for interaction. More specifically, diplomatic status determined the regulations by which the court provided reception and then trade to a contact.

Keywords

tribute systemreception gradestradepiracydiplomatic statusBoard of Ritesnominal military posts
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 2: Special Issue: International Relations and East Asian History: Impact, Meaning, and Conceptualization , August 2013 , pp. 337 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Primary Sources

Chosŏn wangjo sillok (T'aejo sillok, Chŏngjong sillok, Sejong sillok, Sejo sillok, Sŏngjong sillok) Google Scholar
Da Ming huidian, Koryŏ sa. Kyŏngguk taejŏn. 1983. Seoul: Asea munhwasa.Google Scholar
Sukchu, Sin, comp. 1933. Haedong chegukki. Keijō: Chōsen sōtokufu.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Bell, Catherine. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwanu, Ch'ŏn. 1962. “Chosŏn ch'ogi ‘Owi’ ŭi hyŏngsŏng.” Yŏksa hakpo 17–18: 515–545.Google Scholar
Esherick, Joseph W. 1998. “Cherishing Sources from Afar.” Modern China 24: 135–161.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King. 1948. The United States and China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King. 1958. The United States and China, rev. ed. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. 1996. “Imperial Guest Ritual: A Translation and Introductory Comments.” In Religions of China in Practice, ed. Lopez, Donald S., 471–487. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshihiro, Kawachi. 1992. Mindai Joshinshi no kenkyū. Kyoto: Dōhōsha.Google Scholar
Kujin, Kim. 1995. “Yŏjin kwa ŭi kwangye.” In Hanguksa 22: Chosŏn wangjo ŭi sŏngnip kwa taeoe kwangye, 329–367. Seoul: Kuksa p'yŏnch'an wiwŏnhoe.Google Scholar
Taku, Kimura. 2004. “Jūgo seiki Chōsen ōchō no tai-Nihon gaikō ni okeru tosho shiyō no imi: Sakuho kankei to sono setten no tankyū.” Chōsen gakuhō 191: 31–76.Google Scholar
Hidetaka, Nakamura. 1965. Nissen kankeishi no kenkyū, vol. 1. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Hidetaka, Nakamura. 1966. Nihon to Chōsen. Tokyo: Shibundō.Google Scholar
Setsuko, Osa. 1987. Chūsei Nitchō kankei to Tsushima. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenesu R. 1999. “Chōsen ōchō-jushoku Joshinjin no kankei to ‘Chōsen.’” Rekishi hyōron 592: 29–42.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenneth R. 1992. “From Raiders to Traders: Border Security and Border Control in Early Chosŏn, 1392–1450.” Korean Studies 16: 94–115.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenneth R. 1997. “Policies of Practicality: The Chosŏn Court's Regulation of Contact with Japanese and Jurchens, 1392–1580s.” PhD diss., University of Hawai'i.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenneth R. 1999. “The Imposter Branch of the Hatakeyama Family and Japanese-Choson Korea Court Relations, 1455–1580s” [Kokusai Kirisutokyō Daigaku Ajia Bunka Kenkyŭjo]. Ajia bunka kenkyŭ 25, 3: 67–87.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenneth R. 2000. “Centering the King of Chosŏn: Aspects of Korean Maritime Diplomacy, 1392–1592.” Journal of Asian Studies 59: 109–125.Google Scholar
Robinson, Kenneth R. 2010. “Residence and Foreign Relations in the Peninsular Northeast During the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In The Northern Region of Korea: History, Identity, and Culture, ed. Kim, Sun Joo, 18–36. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kimiaki, Takahashi. 1982a. “Gaiko girei yori mita Muromachi jidai no Nitchō kankei.” Shigaku zasshi 91, 8: 67–85.Google Scholar
Kimiaki, Takahashi. 1982b. “Gaikō monjo, ‘sho’—‘shi’ ni tsuite.” Nenpō chūseishi kenkyū 7: 72–95.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. Jr. 1988. “Tribute, Defensiveness, and Dependency: Uses and Limits of Some Basic Ideas About Mid-Qing Dynasty Foreign Relations.” The American Neptune 48, 4: 225–229.Google Scholar
Inyong, Yi. 1954. Hanguk Manju kwangyesa ŭi yŏngu. Seoul: Ŭryu munhwasa.Google Scholar
Pongyŏng, Yu. 1973. “Wangjo sillok e nat'anan Yijo chŏngi ŭi Yain.” Paeksan hakpo 14: 87–164.Google Scholar