Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:36:56.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Parties, Party Choice, and Partisanship in East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Russell J. Dalton ,
Yun-han Chu  and
Doh Chull Shin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political parties are widely seen as “a sine qua non for the organization of the modern democratic polity and for the expression of political pluralism.” The manner in which parties articulate political interests largely defines the nature of electoral competition, the representation of citizen interests, the policy consequences of elections—and ultimately the functioning of the democratic process.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Party Choice and Partisanship in East Asia , August 2007 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. van Beizen, Ingrid, “How Political Parties Shape Democracy.” Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine, working paper 04-16.Google Scholar

2. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron, eds., Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966); Diamond, Larry and Gunther, Richard, eds., Political Parties and Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001); Dalton, Russell J. and McAllister, Ian, eds., “Political Parties and Political Development,” special issue of Party Politics (March 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Campbell, Angus et al., The American Voter (New York: Wiley, 1960); Miller, Warren, “The Cross-National Use of Party Identification as a Stimulus to Political Inquiry.” In Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis, eds., Party Identification and Beyond (New York: Wiley, 1976); Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds., Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

4. These articles were first presented at a research conference held at the East West Center in Honolulu. We want to acknowledge Chung Nam Kim and the POSCO program, the East Asian Barometer Program, and the Center for the Study of Democracy at the University of California, Irvine, for their support of this project.Google Scholar

5. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments (New York: Free Press, 1967).Google Scholar

6. Flanagan, Scott et al., The Japanese Voter (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994); Chu, Yun-han and Lin, Tse-min, “The Process of Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan: Social Cleavages, Electoral Competition and the Emerging Party System.” In Tien, Hung-Mao, ed., Taiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1996); Shin, Doh Chull, Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

7. Bartolini, Stefano and Mair, Peter, “Challenges to Contemporary Political Parties.” In Diamond, and Gunther, , eds., Political Parties and Democracy, pp. 327–343.Google Scholar

8. Mainwaring, Scott and Zoco, Edurne, “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition,” Party Politics 13 (March 2007): 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Only 3.5 percent of Japanese reported a party membership, which was about half the average among the fifteen European Union member states in 1999 (5.6 percent). Inglehart, Ronald et al., Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook (Siglo XXI Editores, 2004).Google Scholar

10. See Dalton, and Wattenberg, , Parties Without Partisans; Dalton, and McAllister, , “Parties and Political Development.” Google Scholar

11. Schmitter, Philippe, “Parties Are Not What They Once Were.” In Diamond, and Gunther, , eds., Political Parties and Democracy. Google Scholar

12. See Mainwaring, and Zoco, , “Political Sequences,” pp. 164–167.Google Scholar

13. The data used here were generally downloaded from the websites of each project, which also include further documentation for each survey. These data are available free to other researchers: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org), East Asia Barometer Survey (eacsurvey.law.ntu.edu.tw/), and the World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). We express our appreciation to all the relevant principal investigators for sharing their data with the research community.Google Scholar

14. Using 2002 as the approximate date for most of our survey data, the Freedom House ranked Mongolia, the Philippines, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand as free. Of course, Thailand then experienced a coup in 2006, but this occurred subsequent to the EAB Thai survey. Indonesia was rated as only partly free, but because of the rapid advance of electoral democracy since 1998, we include Indonesia in our study where possible.Google Scholar

15. Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999); Farrell, David, Comparing Electoral Systems (London: Macmillan, 1998); Norris, Pippa, Electoral Engineering (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar