Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:21:38.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DECLINING LEGISLATIVE DISSENT IN CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL PARTY CONGRESS ELECTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2020

Tao Li Open the ORCID record for Tao Li [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a novel statistical method, we estimate the vote counts of the secret elections held by the National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party from 1945 to 2017. We also construct a metric for voter preference diversity based on a standard index of legislative party fractionalization. We find that both the number of dissenting votes and the voter preference diversity index plummeted to the bottom in 2017, which is an unprecedented phenomenon in the party's history. Applying the same method to provincial party congress elections from 2006–2017, we find that provincial dissenting votes also declined around the same time, though the magnitude is relatively smaller and there is a wide range of provincial variations. We suggest that President Xi's suppression of formal party institutions is complete at the national level but not yet at the provincial level.

Keywords

Chinese Communist PartyXi Jinpingparty congress elections
Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 231 - 242
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Zhehou. 2003. “Zhong Gong Jiu Da Nei Mu Suo Yi.” [Recollection of the 9th CCPNC] Yan Huang Chun Qiu 2003.3: 42–49.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. “Elections under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kung, James Kai-sing. 2014. “The Emperor Strikes Back: Political Status, Career Incentives and Grain Procurement During China's Great Leap Famine.” Political Science Research and Methods 2 (2): 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Fengming, and Ma, Xiao. 2019. “Is Any Publicity Good Publicity? Media Coverage, Party Institutions, and Authoritarian Power-Sharing.” Political Communication 36 (1): 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Victor, Adolph, Christopher, and Liu, Mingxing. 2012. “Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members in China.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 166–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, Susan L. 2018. “China in Xi's” New Era”: The Return to Personalistic Rule.” Journal of Democracy 29 (2): 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truex, Rory. 2014. “The Returns to Office in a ‘Rubber Stamp’ Parliament.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Guoguang. 2015. China's Party Congress: Power, Legitimacy, and Institutional Manipulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar