Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T08:04:47.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive fluids, added to the culture media, contribute to minimizing phenotypical differences between in vitro-derived and artificial insemination-derived piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Evelyne París-Oller Open the ORCID record for Evelyne París-Oller [Opens in a new window] ,
Cristina Soriano-Úbeda ,
Ramsés Belda-Pérez ,
Lucía Sarriás-Gil ,
Jordana S. Lopes ,
Analuce Canha-Gouveia ,
Joaquín Gadea ,
Luis Alberto Vieira ,
Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez  and
Raquel Romar
...Show all authors
Evelyne París-Oller
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
Cristina Soriano-Úbeda
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
Ramsés Belda-Pérez
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
Lucía Sarriás-Gil
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
Jordana S. Lopes
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Analuce Canha-Gouveia
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Joaquín Gadea
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Luis Alberto Vieira
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Raquel Romar
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Sebastian Cánovas
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
Pilar Coy*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Pilar Coy, Department of Physiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The addition of reproductive fluids (RF) to the culture media has shown benefits in different embryonic traits but its long-term effects on the offspring phenotype are still unknown. We aimed to describe such effects in pigs. Blood samples and growth parameters were collected from piglets derived from in vitro-produced embryos (IVP) with or without RF added in the culture media versus those artificially inseminated (AI), from day 0 to month 6 of life. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed on day 45 of life. We show here the first comparative data of the growth of animals produced through different assisted reproductive techniques, demonstrating differences between groups. Overall, there was a tendency to have a larger size at birth and faster growth in animals derived from in vitro fertilization and embryo culture versus AI, although this trend was diminished by the addition of RFs to the culture media. Similarly, small differences in hematological indices and glucose tolerance between animals derived from AI and those derived from IVP, with a sex-dependent effect, tended to fade in the presence of RF. The addition of RF to the culture media could contribute to minimizing the phenotypical differences between the in vitro-derived and AI offspring, particularly in males.

Keywords

Assisted reproductive technologiesin vitro embryo productionreproductive fluidsgrowthhematological parametersglucose tolerance
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , October 2022 , pp. 593 - 605
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

El Hajj, N, Haaf, T. Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: implications for human assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(3), 632–641. DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargreave, M, Jensen, A, Hansen, MK, Dehlendorff, C. Association between fertility treatment and cancer risk in children. JAMA. 2019; 322(22), 2203–2210. DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.18037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canovas, S, Ivanova, E, Romar, R, et al. DNA methylation and gene expression changes derived from assisted reproductive technologies can be decreased by reproductive fluids. Elife. 2017; 6, 1–24. DOI 10.7554/eLife.23670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos-Ibeas, P, Heras, S, Gómez-Redondo, I, et al. Embryo responses to stress induced by assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019; 86(10), 1292–1306. DOI 10.1002/mrd.23119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menelaou, K, Prater, M, Tunster, S, et al. Blastocyst transfer in mice alters the placental transcriptome and growth. Reproduction. 2019; 159(2), 115–132. DOI 10.1530/REP-19-0293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Montfoort, APA, Hanssen, LLP, De Sutter, P, Viville, S, Geraedts, JPM, De Boer, P. Assisted reproduction treatment and epigenetic inheritance. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(2), 171–197. DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmr047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindsfather, AJ, Czekalski, MA, Pressimone, CA, Erisman, MP, Mann, MRW. Perturbations in imprinted methylation from assisted reproductive technologies but not advanced maternal age in mouse preimplantation embryos. Clin Epigenetics. 2019; 11(1), 1–14. DOI 10.1186/s13148-019-0751-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattori, H, Hiura, H, Kitamura, A, et al. Association of four imprinting disorders and ART. Clin Epigenetics. 2019; 11(1), 1–12. DOI 10.1186/s13148-019-0623-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, SK, Rinaudo, PF. Physiological, metabolic and transcriptional postnatal phenotypes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the mouse. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017; 8(4), 403–410. DOI 10.1017/S204017441700023X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraretti, AP, Nygren, K, Andersen, AN, et al. Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles†. Hum Reprod Open. 2017; 2017(2), 46. DOI 10.1093/hropen/hox012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, Soom A, Wydooghe, E, Heras, S, Vandaele, L. Alternative models for the study of embryo-maternal cross-talk and signaling molecules from fertilisation to implantation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011; 23(8), 10–12. DOI 10.1071/RDv23n8_FO.Google Scholar
Bellinger, DA, Merricks, EP, Nichols, TC. Swine models of type 2 diabetes mellitus: insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, and cardiovascular complications. ILAR J. 2006; 47(3), 243–258. DOI 10.1093/ilar.47.3.243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzen, E, Follmann, F, Jungersen, G, Agerholm, JS. A review of the human vs. porcine female genital tract and associated immune system in the perspective of using minipigs as a model of human genital Chlamydia infection. Vet Res. 2015; 46(1), 1–13. DOI 10.1186/s13567-015-0241-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, RDA, Beebe, LFS, Blackshaw, AW, Keates, HL. Farrowing rates and litter size following transfer of vitrified porcine embryos into a commercial swine herd. Theriogenology. 2004; 61(7-8), 1533–1543. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.09.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avilés, M, Gutiérrez-Adán, A, Coy, P. Oviductal secretions: Will they be key factors for the future ARTs? Mol Hum Reprod. 2010; 16(12), 896–906. DOI 10.1093/molehr/gaq056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
París-Oller, E, Navarro-Serna, S, Soriano-Úbeda, C, et al. Reproductive fluids, used for the in vitro production of pig embryos, result in healthy offspring and avoid aberrant placental expression of PEG3 and LUM. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021; 12(1), 32. DOI 10.1186/s40104-020-00544-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casas-Díaz, E, Closa-Sebastià, F, Marco, I, Lavín, S, Bach-Raich, E, Cuenca, R. Hematologic and biochemical reference intervals for Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) captured by cage trap. Vet Clin Pathol. 2015; 44(2), 215–222. DOI 10.1111/vcp.12250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perri, AM. An investigation of various hematological and biochemical parameters to asses the health of nursery pigs. Univ Guelph. 2015, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
Ventrella, D, Dondi, F, Barone, F, et al. The biomedical piglet: establishing reference intervals for haematology and clinical chemistry parameters of two age groups with and without iron supplementation. BMC Vet Res. 2017; 13(1), 1–8. DOI 10.1186/s12917-017-0946-2.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, ME, Aguirre, RS, Hannon, TS. Methods for measuring risk for type 2 diabetes in youth: the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Curr Diab Rep. 2018; 18(8), S161. DOI 10.1007/s11892-018-1023-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manell, E, Hedenqvist, P, Svensson, A, Jensen-waern, M. Establishment of a refined oral glucose tolerance test in pigs, and assessment of insulin, glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 responses. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(2), e0148896. DOI 10.5061/dryad.n3f4j.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Whittemore, CT. Whittemore’s Science and Practice of Pig Production, 2006, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Vázquez, FA, Ruiz, S, Matás, C, et al. Production of transgenic piglets using ICSI - sperm-mediated gene transfer in combination with recombinase RecA. Reproduction. 2010; 140(2), 259–272. DOI 10.1530/REP-10-0129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsen, H, Schmidt, M, Helm, P, Sangild, PT, Greve, T, Callesen, H. Ease of calving, blood chemistry, insulin and bovine growth hormone of newborn calves derived from embryos produced in vitro in culture systems with serum and co-culture or with PVA. Theriogenology. 2000; 54, 147–158. DOI 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00333-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, AM, Mullaart, E, De Roos, APW, et al. Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI, MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring. Theriogenology. 2000; 53(2), 575–597. DOI 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00259-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, SK, Donjacour, A, Simbulan, RK, et al. Sexually dimorphic effect of in vitro fertilization (IVF) on adult mouse fat and liver metabolomes. Endocrinology. 2014; 155, 1–14. DOI 10.1210/en.2014-1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, L, Haley, CS, Ellegren, H, et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science. 1994; 263(5154), 1771–1774. DOI 10.1126/science.8134840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleijkers, SHM, Van Montfoort, APA, Smits, LJM, et al. IVF culture medium affects post-natal weight in humans during the first 2 years of life. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(4), 661–669. DOI 10.1093/humrep/deu025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceelen, M, Van Weissenbruch, MM, Prein, J, et al. Growth during infancy and early childhood in relation to blood pressure and body fat measures at age 8-18 years of IVF children and spontaneously conceived controls born to subfertile parents. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(11), 2788–2795. DOI 10.1093/humrep/dep273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, T, Shi, J, Luo, L, et al. Study on hematological and biochemical characters of cloned duroc pigs and their progeny. Animals. 2019; 9(11), 1–9. DOI 10.3390/ani9110912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekert Kabalin, A, Balenović, T, Valpotić, I, Pavičić, Ž, Valpotić, H. The influence of birth mass and age of suckling piglets on erythrocyte parameters. Vet Arh. 2008; 78(4), 307–319.Google Scholar
Miller, ER. Vitamins and minerals for nursing pigs: iron. In Proc Am Assoc Swine Vet Conf, 1977.Google Scholar
Yeom, S-C, Cho, S-Y, Park, C-G, Lee, W-J. Analysis of reference interval and age-related changes in serum biochemistry and hematology in the specific pathogen free miniature pig. Lab Anim Res. 2012; 28(4), 245. DOI 10.5625/lar.2012.28.4.245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grindem, CB. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th edition. Editors: Douglas J. Weiss, K. Jane Wardrop. Vet Clin Pathol. 2011; 40(2), 270. DOI 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2011.00324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubreuil, P, Lapierre, H. Biochemistry reference values for quebec lactating dairy cows, nursing sows, growing pigs and calves. Can J Vet Res. 1997; 61(3), 235–239.Google ScholarPubMed
Stockham, SL, Scott, MA. Platelets. In Fundamentals of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 2008; pp. 223–258. Blackwell, Ames.Google Scholar
Evstatiev, R, Bukaty, A, Jimenez, K, et al. Iron deficiency alters megakaryopoiesis and platelet phenotype independent of thrombopoietin. Am J Hematol. 2014; 89(5), 524–529. DOI 10.1002/ajh.23682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, MJ, Park, PW, Seo, YH, et al. Comparison of platelet parameters in thrombocytopenic patients associated with acute myeloid leukemia and primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014; 25(3), 221–225. DOI 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrooman, LA, Bartolomei, MS. Can assisted reproductive technologies cause adult-onset disease? Evidence from human and mouse. Reprod Toxicol. 2017; 68, 72–84. DOI 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.07.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donjacour, A, Liu, X, Lin, W, Simbulan, R, Rinaudo, PF. In vitro fertilization affects growth and glucose metabolism in a sex-specific manner in an outbred mouse model 1. Biol Reprod. 2014; 90(4), 1–10. DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.113.113134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M, Wu, L, Zhao, J, Wu, F, Davies, MJ, Wittert, GA. Altered glucose metabolism in mouse and humans conceived by IVF. Diabetes. 2014; 63(10), 3189–3198. DOI 10.2337/db14-0103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donjacour, A, Liu, X, Lin, W, Simbulan, R, Rinaudo, PF. In vitro fertilization affects growth and glucose metabolism in a sex-specific manner in an outbred mouse model 1, 2014; 90, 1–10. DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.113.113134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakaguchi, K, Takeda, K, Maeda, M, et al. Glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance test as an index of glucose intolerance. Diabetol Int. 2016; 7(1), 53–58. DOI 10.1007/s13340-015-0212-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluschke, AM, Simmons, GS, Keates, HL, et al. An updated method for the jugular catheterization of grower pigs for repeated blood sampling following an oral glucose tolerance test. Lab Anim. 2016; 51(4), 397–404. DOI 10.1177/0023677216682772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

París-Oller et al. supplementary material

París-Oller et al. supplementary material

Download París-Oller et al. supplementary material(File)
File 139.4 KB