Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:49:22.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New challenges beyond nutrition: c-section, air pollution and domestic violence

Part of: Ibero-American DOHaD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

A. A. Ferraro ,
M. T. B. Fernandes  and
S. E. Vieira
A. A. Ferraro*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
M. T. B. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
S. E. Vieira
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
* Address for correspondence: Alexandre A. Ferraro, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av Dr Eneas Carvalho Aguiar, 647 Sao Paulo - SP, Brazil. Tel/Fax: +5511 26618672. (Email [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The DOHaD research field has successfully associated adult non-communicable diseases with inadequate nutrition in early periods of life. More recently, different types of exposure have been linked with impaired developmental outcomes and later health consequences, such as cesarean section at delivery, air pollution and domestic violence during pregnancy. The aim of this work is to bring up this issue looking at the published evidence on these three highly prevalent hazards in Latin American countries.

Keywords

air pollutionc-sectiondomestic violence
Type
Brief Report
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 7 , Issue 3: Themed Issue: Ibero-American DOHaD Society , June 2016 , pp. 253 - 256
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Villar, J, Valladares, E, Wojdyla, D, et al. WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006; 367, 1819–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M, Gülmezoglu, AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010; 375, 490–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Victora, CG, Aquino, EM, do Carmo Leal, M, et al. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011; 377, 1863–1876, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4. Epub 2011 May 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kuhle, S, Tong, OS, Woolcott, CG. Association between caesarean section and childohood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015; 16, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Goldani, MZ, Barbieri, MA, da Silva, AA, et al. Cesarean section and increased body mass index in school children: two cohort studies from distinct socio-economic background areas in Brazil. Nutr J. 2013; 12, 104.Google Scholar
6. Li, HT, Zhou, YB, Liu, JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013; 37, 893–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Mamun, AA, Sutharsan, R, O’Callaghan, M, et al. Cesarean delivery and the long-term risk of offspring obesity. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122, 1176–1183.Google Scholar
8. Pei, Z, Heinrich, J, Fuertes, E, et al. Cesarean delivery and risk of childhood obesity. J Pediatr. 2014; 164, 1068–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Thavagnanam, S, Fleming, J, Bromley, A, Shields, MD, Cardwell, CR. A meta-analysis of the association between caesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008; 629–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Sevelsted, A, Stokholm, J, Bønnelykke, K, Bisgaard, H. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics. 2015; 135, e92–e98.Google Scholar
11. Cardwell, CR, Stene, LC, Joner, G, et al. Cesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008; 51, 726–735.Google Scholar
12. Cho, CE, Norman, M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208, 249–254.Google Scholar
13. Vieira, SE. The health burden of pollution: the impact of prenatal exposure to air pollutants. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015; 10, 1111–1121.Google Scholar
14. Pedersen, M, Giorgis-Allemand, L, Bernard, C, et al. Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE). Lancet Respir Med. 2013; 1, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Dadvand, P, Parker, J, Bell, ML, et al. Maternal exposure to particulate air pollution and term birth weight: a multi-country evaluation of effect and heterogeneity. Environ Health Perspect. 2013; 121, 267–373.Google Scholar
16. Zhu, X, Liu, Y, Chen, Y, et al. Maternal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015; 22, 3383–3396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Gehring, U, Wijga, AH, Fischer, P, et al. Traffic-related air pollution, preterm birth and term birth weight in the PIAMA birth cohort study. Environ Res. 2011; 111, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Pearce, MS, Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, et al. No association between ambient particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and stillbirth risk in the north of England, 1962-1992. Environ Res. 2010; 110, 118–122.Google Scholar
19. Van den Hooven, EH, Pierik, FH, de Kluizenaar, Y, et al. Air pollution exposure and markers of placental growth and function: the generation R study. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120, 1753–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Krug, EG. ed. World report on violence and health. 2002. World Health Organization: Geneva.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Shah, PS, Shah, J. Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19, 2017–2031.Google Scholar
22. Jejeebhoy, SJ. Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: impressions from a survey in rural India. Stud Fam Plann. 1998; 29, 300–308.Google Scholar
23. Leung, WC, Wong, YY, Leung, TW, Ho, PC. Pregnancy outcome following domestic violence in a Chinese community. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 72, 79–80.Google Scholar
24. Moraes, CL, Reichenheim, ME. Domestic violence during pregnancy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 79, 269–277.Google Scholar
25. Murphy, CC, Schei, B, Myhr, TL, Du, MJ. Abuse: a risk factor for low birth weight? A systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2001; 164, 1567–1572.Google Scholar
26. Li, J, Olsen, J, Vestergaard, M, et al. Prenatal stress exposure related to maternal bereavement and risk of childhood overweight. PLoS One. 2010; 5, e11896.Google Scholar
27. Entriger, S, Buss, C, Wadhwa, PD. Prenatal stress and developmental programming of human health and disease risk: concepts and integration of empirical findings. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010; 17: 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. O’Keane, V, Scott, J. From 'obstetric complications' to a maternal-foetal origin hypothesis of mood disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2005; 186, 367–368.Google Scholar
29. Gitau, R, Cameron, A, Fisk, N, Glover, V. Fetal exposure to maternal cortisol. Lancet. 1998; 352, 707–708.Google Scholar
30. French, NP, Hagan, R, Evans, SF, Godfrey, M, Newnham, JP. Repeated antenatal corticosteroids: size at birth and subsequent development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180, 114–121.Google Scholar
31. Entringer, S, Buss, C, Wadhwa, PD. Prenatal stress and developmental programming of human health and disease risk: concepts and integration of empirical findings. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010; 17, 507–516.Google Scholar