Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:24:47.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low levels of sulfur and cobalt during the pre- and periconceptional periods affect the oocyte yield of donors and the DNA methylome of preimplantation bovine embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2021

Allice R. Ferreira Nochi ,
Luna N. Vargas ,
Roberto Sartori ,
Roberto G. Júnior ,
Davi B. Araújo ,
Ricardo A. Figueiredo ,
Roberto C. Togawa ,
Marcos M. C. Costa ,
Priscila Grynberg  and
Anelise S. Mendonça
...Show all authors
Allice R. Ferreira Nochi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, State University of São Paulo “Júlio of Mesquita Filho’’ College of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Luna N. Vargas
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil Institute of Genetics and Biochemistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Roberto Sartori
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
Roberto G. Júnior
Affiliation:
Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Davi B. Araújo
Affiliation:
Cargill Animal Nutrition, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Ricardo A. Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Roberto C. Togawa
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Marcos M. C. Costa
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Priscila Grynberg
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Anelise S. Mendonça
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Nayara R. Kussano
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Ivo Pivato
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction Laboratory, College of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Bianca D. M. Silva
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
José Felipe W. Spricigo
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Ligiane O. Leme
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Joseane P. da Silva
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Alexandre R. Caetano
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Margot A. N. Dode
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
Maurício M. Franco*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil Institute of Genetics and Biochemistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Address for correspondence: Maurício M. Franco, Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Parque Estação Biológica, W5 Norte Final, Brasília70770-917, DF, Brazil. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maternal nutrition is critical in mammalian development, influencing the epigenetic reprogramming of gametes, embryos, and fetal programming. We evaluated the effects of different levels of sulfur (S) and cobalt (Co) in the maternal diet throughout the pre- and periconceptional periods on the biochemical and reproductive parameters of the donors and the DNA methylome of the progeny in Bos indicus cattle. The low-S/Co group differed from the control with respect to homocysteine, folic acid, B12, insulin growth factor 1, and glucose. The oocyte yield was lower in heifers from the low S/Co group than that in the control heifers. Embryos from the low-S/Co group exhibited 2320 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) across the genome compared with the control embryos. We also characterized candidate DMRs linked to the DNMT1 and DNMT3B genes in the blood and sperm cells of the adult progeny. A DMR located in DNMT1 that was identified in embryos remained differentially methylated in the sperm of the progeny from the low-S/Co group. Therefore, we associated changes in specific compounds in the maternal diet with DNA methylation modifications in the progeny. Our results help to elucidate the impact of maternal nutrition on epigenetic reprogramming in livestock, opening new avenues of research to study the effect of disturbed epigenetic patterns in early life on health and fertility in adulthood. Considering that cattle are physiologically similar to humans with respect to gestational length, our study may serve as a model for studies related to the developmental origin of health and disease in humans.

Keywords

Epigeneticsintergenerational inheritancelivestock
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 231 - 243
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grandjean, P, Barouki, R, Bellinger, DC, et al. Life-long implications of developmental exposure to environmental stressors: new perspectives. Endocrinology. 2015; 156(10), 3408–3415.10.1210/en.2015-1350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillycrop, K, Burdge, GC. Maternal diet as a modifier of offspring epigenetics. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2015; 6(2), 88–95.10.1017/S2040174415000124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reik, W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007; 447(7143), 425–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, AJ, De Sousa, P, Caveney, A, et al. Impact of bovine oocyte maturation media on oocyte transcript levels, blastocyst development, cell number, and apoptosis. Biology of Reproduction. 2000; 62(2), 355–364.10.1095/biolreprod62.2.355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorritsma, R, Cesar, ML, Hermans, JT, Kruitwagen, CL, Vos, PL, Kruip, TA. Effects of non-esterified fatty acids on bovine granulosa cells and developmental potential of oocytes in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004; 81(3–4), 225–235.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadokawa, H, Tameoka, N, Uchiza, M, Kimura, Y, Yonai, M. Short communication: a field study on the relationship between body condition and embryo production in superovulated Holstein yearling heifers. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91(3), 1087–1091.10.3168/jds.2007-0642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, JL, Opsomer, G, Van Soom, A, Goovaerts, IG, Bols, PE. Reduced fertility in high-yielding dairy cows: are the oocyte and embryo in danger? Part I. The importance of negative energy balance and altered corpus luteum function to the reduction of oocyte and embryo quality in high-yielding dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008; 43(5), 612–622.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00960.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, MR, Lee, SS, Doherty, AS, et al. Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development. 2004; 131(15), 3727–3735.10.1242/dev.01241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, LE, Fernandes, K, McEvoy, TG, et al. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat Genet. 2001; 27(2), 153–154.10.1038/84769CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, KD, Allegrucci, C, Singh, R, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(49), 19351–19356.10.1073/pnas.0707258104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenisch, R, Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003; 33, 245–254.10.1038/ng1089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acosta, DAV, Denicol, AC, Tribulo, P, et al. Effects of rumen-protected methionine and choline supplementation on the preimplantation embryo in Holstein cows. Theriogenology. 2016; 85(9), 1669–1679.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.01.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olthof, MR, van Vliet, T, Boelsma, E, Verhoef, P. Low dose betaine supplementation leads to immediate and long term lowering of plasma homocysteine in healthy men and women. J Nutr. 2003; 133(12), 4135–4138.10.1093/jn/133.12.4135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saw, SM, Yuan, JM, Ong, CN, et al. Genetic, dietary, and other lifestyle determinants of plasma homocysteine concentrations in middle-aged and older Chinese men and women in Singapore. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73(2), 232–239.10.1093/ajcn/73.2.232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechdel, SI, Honeywell, HE, Dutcher, RA, Kunutsen, MH. Synthesis of vitamin B in the rumen of cow. J Biol Chem. 1928; 80, 231–238.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83923-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue-Choi, M, Nelson, HH, Robien, K, et al. One-carbon metabolism nutrient status and plasma S-adenosylmethionine concentrations in middle-aged and older Chinese in Singapore. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2012; 3(2), 160–173.Google Scholar
Ikeda, S, Namekawa, T, Sugimoto, M, Kume, S. Expression of methylation pathway enzymes in bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2010; 313(3), 129–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Kwong, WY, Adamiak, SJ, Gwynn, A, Singh, R, Sinclair, KD. Endogenous folates and single-carbon metabolism in the ovarian follicle, oocyte and pre-implantation embryo. Reproduction. 2010; 139(4), 705–715.10.1530/REP-09-0517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, SA, Javurek, AB, Painter, MS, et al. Effects of a maternal high-fat diet on offspring behavioral and metabolic parameters in a rodent model. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017; 8(1), 75–88.10.1017/S2040174416000490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caixeta, ES, Ripamonte, P, Franco, MM, Junior, JB, Dode, MA. Effect of follicle size on mRNA expression in cumulus cells and oocytes of Bos indicus: an approach to identify marker genes for developmental competence. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2009; 21(5), 655–664.10.1071/RD08201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, GM, Carvalho, JO, Filho, ES, et al. Effect of Percoll volume, duration and force of centrifugation, on in vitro production and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2009; 71(8), 1289–1297.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juhling, F, Kretzmer, H, Bernhart, SH, Otto, C, Stadler, PF, Hoffmann, S. Metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res. 2016; 26(2), 256–262.10.1101/gr.196394.115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, H, Xu, T, Feng, H, et al. Detection of differentially methylated regions from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data without replicates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(21), e141.Google Scholar
Krueger, F, Andrews, SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(11), 1571–1572.10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Siegmund, KD, Laird, PW, Berman, BP. Bis-SNP: combined DNA methylation and SNP calling for Bisulfite-seq data. Genome Biol. 2012; 13(7), R61.10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, JO, Michalczechen-Lacerda, VA, Sartori, R, et al. The methylation patterns of the IGF2 and IGF2R genes in bovine spermatozoa are not affected by flow-cytometric sex sorting. Mol Reprod Dev. 2012; 79(2), 77–84.10.1002/mrd.21410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L-C, Dahiya, RJB. MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(11), 1427–1431.10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaki, Y, Oda, M, Okano, MJNar. QUMA: quantification tool for methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(suppl_2), W170–W175.10.1093/nar/gkn294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Foundation for Statistical Computing V, Austria. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2011.Google Scholar
Laanpere, M, Altmae, S, Stavreus-Evers, A, Nilsson, TK, Yngve, A, Salumets, A. Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism and its effect on female fertility and pregnancy viability. Nutr Rev. 2010; 68(2), 99–113.10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00266.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, LE, Rees, WD, Sinclair, KD. Programming in the pre-implantation embryo. In Fetal Nutrition and Adult Disease: Programming of Chronic Disease through Fetal Exposure to Undernutrition (ed. Langley-Evans, S.C.). 2004; pp. 333–351. CAB International, Oxford.10.1079/9780851998213.0333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, P, Melnyk, S, Pogribna, M, Pogribny, IP, Hine, RJ, James, SJ. Increase in plasma homocysteine associated with parallel increases in plasma S-adenosylhomocysteine and lymphocyte DNA hypomethylation. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275(38), 29318–29323.10.1074/jbc.M002725200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Hurk, R, Zhao, J. Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology. 2005; 63(6), 1717–1751.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lussier, JG, Matton, P, Dufour, JJ. Growth rates of follicles in the ovary of the cow. J Reprod Fertil. 1987;81(2), 301–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russe, I. Oogenesis in cattle and sheep. Bibl Anat. 1983; 24, 77–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Webb, R, Garnsworthy, PC, Gong, JG, Armstrong, DG. Control of follicular growth: local interactions and nutritional influences. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82, E63–E74.Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, JM. Folate and vitamin B12. Proc Nutr Soc. 1999;58(2), 441–448.10.1017/S0029665199000580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stangl, GI, Schwarz, FJ, Muller, H, Kirchgessner, M. Evaluation of the cobalt requirement of beef cattle based on vitamin B12, folate, homocysteine and methylmalonic acid. Br J Nutr. 2000; 84(5), 645–653.10.1017/S0007114500001987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Interspecies differences in folate metabolism. Nutr Rev. 1992; 50(4 (Pt 1)), 116–118.10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb01301.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, GP, Snoswell, AM. Comparative studies on the methionine synthesis in sheep and rat tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1985; 80(3), 489–494.10.1016/0305-0491(85)90278-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, GP, Snoswell, AM. Developmental changes in the activities of enzymes related to methyl group metabolism in sheep tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1986; 83(1), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, AJ, Feng, Z, Mak, TW, You, H, Jin, S. Coordination and communication between the p53 and IGF-1-AKT-TOR signal transduction pathways. Genes Dev. 2006; 20(3), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Yang, L, Wang, W, et al. Effect of homocysteine on gluconeogenesis in mice. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2013; 33(4), 507–510.Google ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, DG, McEvoy, TG, Baxter, G, et al. Effect of dietary energy and protein on bovine follicular dynamics and embryo production in vitro: associations with the ovarian insulin-like growth factor system. Biology of Reproduction. 2001; 64(6), 1624–1632.10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scaramuzzi, RJ, Campbell, BK, Downing, JA, et al. A review of the effects of supplementary nutrition in the ewe on the concentrations of reproductive and metabolic hormones and the mechanisms that regulate folliculogenesis and ovulation rate. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2006; 46(4), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakar, S, Setser, J, Zhao, H, et al. Inhibition of growth hormone action improves insulin sensitivity in liver IGF-1-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113(1), 96–105.10.1172/JCI200417763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattocks, DA, Mentch, SJ, Shneyder, J, et al. Short term methionine restriction increases hepatic global DNA methylation in adult but not young male C57BL/6J mice. Exp Gerontol. 2017; 88, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okae, H, Chiba, H, Hiura, H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation dynamics during early human development. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(12), e1004868.10.1371/journal.pgen.1004868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, WA, Mann, MR. Epigenetic regulation of genomic imprinting from germ line to preimplantation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2014; 81(2), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y, Xu, L, Bickhart, DM, et al. Reduced representation bisulphite sequencing of ten bovine somatic tissues reveals DNA methylation patterns and their impacts on gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17(1), 779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reik, W, Dean, W, Walter, J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001; 293(5532), 1089–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirane, K, Toh, H, Kobayashi, H, et al. Mouse oocyte methylomes at base resolution reveal genome-wide accumulation of non-CpG methylation and role of DNA methyltransferases. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(4), e1003439.10.1371/journal.pgen.1003439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Li, R, Wang, Y, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylome variation in two genetically distinct chicken lines using MethylC-seq. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16, 851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masser, DR, Hadad, N, Porter, HL, et al. Sexually divergent DNA methylation patterns with hippocampal aging. Aging Cell. 2017; 16(6), 1342–1352.10.1111/acel.12681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, TG, James, ER, Aston, KI, et al. Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2019; 12(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reik, W, Dean, W, Walter, JJS. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001; 293(5532), 1089–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Nochi et al. supplementary material

Nochi et al. supplementary material

Download Nochi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 273.5 KB