Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:36:48.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lessons from evolution: developmental plasticity in vertebrates with complex life cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2010

R. J. Denver*
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
J. Middlemis-Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr R. J. Denver, PhD, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 3065C Kraus Natural Science Building, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA. (Email [email protected])

Abstract

Developmental plasticity is the property of a given genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to the environmental conditions experienced during development. Chordates have two basic modes of development, direct and indirect. Direct development (mode of humans) was derived evolutionarily from indirect development (mode of many amphibians), the major difference being the presence of a larval stage with indirect development; larvae undergo metamorphosis to the juvenile adult. In amphibians, environmental conditions experienced during the larval stage can lead to extreme plasticity in behaviour, morphology and the timing of metamorphosis and can cause variation in adult phenotypic expression (carry-over effects, or developmental programming). Hormones of the neuroendocrine stress axis play pivotal roles in mediating environmental effects on animal development. Stress hormones, produced in response to a deteriorating larval habitat, accelerate amphibian metamorphosis; in mammals, stress hormones hasten the onset of parturition and play an important role in pre-term birth caused by intra-uterine stress. While stress hormones can promote survival in a deteriorating larval or intra-uterine habitat, costs may be incurred, such as reduced growth and size at metamorphosis or birth. Furthermore, exposure to elevated stress hormones during the tadpole or foetal stage can cause permanent neurological changes, leading to altered physiology and behaviour later in life. The actions of stress hormones in animal development are evolutionarily conserved, and therefore amphibians can serve as important model organisms for research on the mechanisms of developmental plasticity.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ozanne, SE, Costancia, M. Mechanisms of disease: the developmental origins of disease and the role of the epigenotype. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 3, 539546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Pigliucci, M. Phenotypic Plasticity. Beyond Nature and Nurture, 2001. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. West-Eberhard, MJ. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, 2003. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Via, S, Lande, R. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution. 1985; 39, 505522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. DeWitt, TJ, Scheiner, SM. Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches, 2004. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. West-Eberhard, MJ. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102, 65436549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Pigliucci, M, Murren, CJ, Schlichting, CD. Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209, 23622367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Denver, RJ. Stress hormones mediate environment-genotype interactions during amphibian development. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009; 164, 2031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Hall, BK, Wake, MH. Introduction: larval development, evolution and ecology. In The Origin and Evolution of Larval Forms (eds. Hall BK, Wake MH), 1999; pp. 119. Academic Press: London, UK.Google Scholar
10. Werner, EE. Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life cycles. In Size-Structured Populations (eds. Ebenman B, Persson L), 1988; pp. 6081. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Moran, NA. Adaptation and constraint in the complex life cycles of animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1994; 25, 573600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ebenman, B. Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life cycle. Am Nat. 1992; 139, 9901021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Price, TD, Grant, PR. Life history traits and natural selection for small body size in a population of Darwin’s finches. Evolution. 1984; 38, 483494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Pechenik, JA, Wendt, DE, Jarrett, JN. Metamorphosis is not a new beginning. Bioscience. 1998; 48, 901910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Nicieza, AG, Alvarez, D, Atienza, EMS. Delayed effects of larval predation risk and food quality on anuran juvenile performance. J Evol Biol. 2006; 19, 10921103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Relyea, RA. The lasting effects of adaptive plasticity: predator-induced tadpoles become long-legged frogs. Ecology. 2001; 82, 19471955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Hu, F, Crespi, EJ, Denver, RJ. Programming neuroendocrine stress axis activity by exposure to glucocorticoids during postembryonic development of the frog Xenopus laevis . Endocrinology. 2008; 149, 54705481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Blouin, MS, Brown, ST. Effects of temperature-induced variation in anuran larval growth rate on head width and leg length at metamorphosis. Oecologia. 2000; 125, 358361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Brown, DD, Cai, LQ. Amphibian metamorphosis. Dev Biol. 2007; 306, 2033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Dejesus, E, Hirano, T, Inui, Y. Flounder metamorphosis – its regulation by various hormones. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1993; 11, 323328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Chino, Y, Saito, M, Yamasu, K, et al. Formation of the adult rudiment of sea-urchins is influenced by thyroid-hormones. Dev Biol. 1994; 161, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Johnson, LG, Cartwright, CM. Thyroxine-accelerated larval development in the crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci. Biol Bull. 1996; 190, 299301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Heyland, A, Reitzel, AM, Hodin, J. Thyroid hormones determine developmental mode in sand dollars (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Evol Dev. 2004; 6, 382392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Porterfield, SP, Hendrich, CE. The role of thyroid hormones in prenatal and neonatal neurological development--current perspectives. Endocr Rev. 1993; 14, 94106.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Wilbur, HM, Collins, JP. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science. 1973; 182, 13051314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Werner, EE. Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation. Am Nat. 1986; 128, 319341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Newman, R. Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Bioscience. 1992; 42, 671678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Goater, CP. Growth and survival of postmetamorphic toads: interactions among larval history, density, and parasitism. Ecology. 1994; 75, 22642274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Denver, RJ, Mirhadi, N, Phillips, M. Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis: response of Scaphiopus hammondii tadpoles to habitat desiccation. Ecology. 1998; 79, 18591872.Google Scholar
30. Relyea, RA. Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia. 2007; 152, 389400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Denver, RJ. Endocrinology of complex life cycles: amphibians. In Hormones, Brain and Behavior, vol. 2 (eds. Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Rubin RT, Fahrbach SE), 2009; pp. 707–744. Elsevier: San Diego.Google Scholar
32. Chipman, AD. Variation, plasticity and modularity in anuran development. Zoology. 2002; 105, 97104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Newman, RA. Developmental plasticity of Scaphiopus couchii tadpoles in an unpredictable environment. Ecology. 1989; 70, 17751787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Pfennig, DW. Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution. 1992; 46, 14081420.Google ScholarPubMed
35. Pfennig, D. The adaptive significance of an environmentally-cued developmental switch in an anuran tadpole. Oecologia. 1990; 85, 101107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Michimae, H, Wakahara, M. Factors which affect the occurrence of cannibalism and the broad-headed “cannibal” morph in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001; 50, 339345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Michimae, H, Wakahara, M. A tadpole-induced polyphenism in the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Evolution. 2002; 56, 20292038.Google ScholarPubMed
38. Michimae, H, Nishimura, K, Wakahara, M. Mechanical vibrations from tadpoles’ flapping tails transform salamander’s carnivorous morphology. Biol Lett. 2005; 1, 7577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. McCollum, S, Leimberger, J. Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color. Oecologia. 1997; 109, 615621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Relyea, RA. Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology. 2001; 82, 523540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Van Buskirk, J, Mccollum, SA. Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos. 1999; 85, 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Van Buskirk, J, McCollum, SA. Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. J Exp Biol. 2000; 203, 21492158.Google ScholarPubMed
43. Benard, MF. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2004; 35, 651673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Fraker, ME. The dynamics of predation risk assessment: responses of anuran larvae to chemical cues of predators. J Anim Ecol. 2008; 77, 638645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Fraker, ME, Cuddapah, V, McCollum, SA, et al. Characterization of an alarm pheromone secreted by amphibian tadpoles that induces rapid behavioral inhibition and suppression of the neuroendocrine stress axis. Horm Behav. 2009; 55, 520529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Denver, RJ. Proximate mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Am Zool. 1997; 37, 172184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Mazerolle, MJ, Desrochers, A. Landscape resistance to frog movements. Can J Zool. 2005; 83, 455464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Mazerolle, MJ. Amphibian activity, movement patterns, and body size in fragmented peat bogs. J Herpet. 2001; 35, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Thorson, TB. The relationship of water economy to terrestrialism in amphibians. Ecology. 1955; 36, 100116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Scott, D. The effect of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum . Ecology. 1994; 75, 13831396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Morey, S, Reznick, D. Effects of larval density on postmetamorphic spadefoot toads (Spea hammondii). Ecology. 2001; 82, 510522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Semlitsch, RD, Scott, DE, Pechmann, JHK. Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum . Ecology. 1988; 69, 184192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Berven, KA. Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology. 1990; 71, 15991608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Beck, CW, Congdon, JD. Effects of individual variation in age and size at metamorphosis on growth and survivorship of southern toad (Bufo terrestris) metamorphs. Can J Zool-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie. 1999; 77, 944951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Beck, CW, Congdon, JD. Effects of age and size at metamorphosis on performance and metabolic rates of Southern Toad, Bufo terrestris, metamorphs. Funct Ecol. 2000; 14, 3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Van Buskirk, J, Saxer, G. Delayed costs of an induced defense in tadpoles? Morphology, hopping, and development rate at metamorphosis. Evolution. 2001; 55, 821829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Alvarez, D, Nicieza, AG. Effects of induced variation in anuran larval development on postmetamorphic energy reserves and locomotion. Oecologia. 2002; 131, 186195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Altwegg, R, Reyer, H-U. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution. 2003; 57, 872882.Google ScholarPubMed
59. Relyea, RA, Hoverman, JT. The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs. Oecologia. 2003; 134, 596604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Matthews, SG. Early programming of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 13, 373380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Meaney, MJ. Early environmental experience and lifelong changes in behavior and in gene expression. Biol Psychiatry. 1999; 45, 143.Google Scholar
62. Chelgren, ND, Rosenberg, DK, Heppell, SS, et al. Carryover aquatic effects on survival of metamorphic frogs during pond emigration. Ecol Appl. 2006; 16, 250261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. McMillen, IC, Robinson, JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85, 571633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Emerson, SB. Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution. 1978; 32, 551564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Smith, DC. Adult recruitment in chorus frogs – effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology. 1987; 68, 344350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Prado, CPA, Haddad, CFB. Size-fecundity relationships and reproductive investment in female frogs in the Pantanal, south-western Brazil. Herpetol J. 2005; 15, 181189.Google Scholar
67. Girish, S, Saidapur, SK. Interrelationship between food availability, fat body, and ovarian cycles in the frog, Rana tigrina, with a discussion on the role of fat body in anuran reproduction. J Exp Zool. 2000; 286, 487493.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Birch, LC. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol. 1948; 17, 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Cole, LC. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol. 1954; 29, 103137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. McGraw, JB, Caswell, H. Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data. Am Nat. 1996; 147, 4764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71. Benard, MF, Fordyce, JA. Are induced defenses costly? Consequences of predator-induced defenses in western toads, Bufo boreas. Ecology. 2003; 84, 6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. West-Eberhard, MJ. Phenotypic accommodation: adaptive innovation due to developmental plasticity. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005; 304B, 610618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. Gilbert, SF, Epel, D. Ecological Developmental Biology. Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine and Evolution, 2008. Sinauer Associates, Inc.; Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
74. Denver, RJ. Structural and functional evolution of vertebrate neuroendocrine stress systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1163, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Szyf, M, Meaney, M, Weaver, K, et al. DNA methylation: an interface between the social environment and our genomes. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2007; 48, 531531.Google Scholar
76. Meaney, MJ, Szyf, M, Seckl, JR. Epigenetic mechanisms of perinatal programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and health. Trends Mol Med. 2007; 13, 269277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Anway, MD, Cupp, AS, Uzumcu, M, et al. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and mate fertility. Science. 2005; 308, 14661469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Crews, D. Epigenetics and its implications for behavioral neuroendocrinologry. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008; 29, 344357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79. Gore, AC. Developmental programming and endocrine disruptor effects on reproductive neuroendocrine systems. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008; 29, 358374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80. Morgan, DK, Whitelaw, E. The case for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans. Mamm Genome. 2008; 19, 394397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81. Bonett, RM, Hoopfer, ED, Denver, RJ. Molecular mechanisms of corticosteroid synergy with thyroid hormone in Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010; doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82. Denver, RJ. Environmental stress as a developmental cue: corticotropin-releasing hormone is a proximate mediator of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Horm Behav. 1997; 31, 169179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83. Denver, RJ. Hormonal correlates of environmentally induced metamorphosis in the Western spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus hammondii . Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1998; 110, 326336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84. Boorse, GC, Denver, RJ. Endocrine mechanisms underlying plasticity in metamorphic timing in spadefoot toads. Integr Comp Biol. 2004; 43, 646657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85. Smith, R, Mesiano, S, McGrath, S. Hormone trajectories leading to human birth. Regul Pept. 2002; 108, 159164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86. Challis, JRG, Bloomfield, FH, Bocking, AD, et al. Fetal signals and parturition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005; 31, 492499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Knuth, ED, Etgen, AM. Long-term behavioral consequences of brief, repeated neonatal isolation. Brain Res. 2007; 1128, 139147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88. Spencer, KA, Wimpenny, JH, Buchanan, KL, et al. Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2005; 58, 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Chin, EH, Love, OP, Verspoor, JJ, et al. Juveniles exposed to embryonic corticosterone have enhanced flight performance. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2009; 276, 499505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. Amiel-Tison, C, Cabrol, D, Denver, RJ, et al. Fetal adaptation to stress – part I: acceleration of fetal maturation and earlier birth triggered by placental insufficiency in humans. Early Hum Dev. 2004; 78, 1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
91. Davis, EP, Sandman, CA. The timing of prenatal exposure to maternal cortisol and psychosocial stress is associated with human infant cognitive development. Child Dev. 2010; 81, 131148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Weinstock, M, Matlina, E, Maor, GI, et al. Prenatal stress selectively alters the reactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal system in the female rat. Brain Res. 1992; 595, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93. Weinstock, M, Poltyrev, T, Schorer-Apelbaum, D, et al. Effect of prenatal stress on plasma corticosterone and catecholamines in response to footshock in rats. Physiol Behav. 1998; 64, 439444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. Challis, JRG, Sloboda, D, Matthews, SG, et al. The fetal placental hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, parturition and post natal health. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 185, 135144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95. Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Giannoulias, CD, et al. Brief undernutrition in late-gestation sheep programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult offspring. Endocrinology. 2003; 144, 29332940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. McCormick, CM, Smythe, JW, Sharma, S, et al. Sex-specific effects of prenatal stress on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress and brain glucocorticoid receptor density in adult rats. Dev Brain Res. 1995; 84, 5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97. Weinstock, M. Alterations induced by gestational stress in brain morphology and behaviour of the offspring. Prog Neurobiol. 2001; 65, 427451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98. Meaney, MJ. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24, 11611192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99. Smythe, JW, McCormick, CM, Meaney, MJ. Median eminence corticotrophin-releasing hormone content following prenatal stress and neonatal handling. Brain Res Bull. 1996; 40, 195199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Barker, DJP, Osmond, C, Kajantie, E, et al. Growth and chronic disease: findings in the Helsinki Birth Cohort. Ann Hum Biol. 2009; 36, 445458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101. Breier, BH, Vickers, MH, Ikenasio, BA, et al. Fetal programming of appetite and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 185, 7379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102. Welberg, LAM, Seckl, JR. Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids and the programming of the brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001; 13, 113128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103. Weaver, ICG, Diorio, J, Seckl, JR, et al. Early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression – Characterization of intracellular mediators and potential genomic target sites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004; 1024, 182212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104. Glennemeier, KA, Denver, RJ. Role for corticoids in mediating the response of Rana pipiens tadpoles to intraspecific competition. J Exp Zool. 2002; 292, 3240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105. Crespi, EJ, Denver, RJ. Roles of stress hormones in food intake regulation in anuran amphibians throughout the life cycle. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 2005; 141, 381390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106. Crespi, EJ, Denver, RJ. Ontogeny of corticotropin-releasing factor effects on locomotion and foraging in the Western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii). Horm Behav. 2004; 46, 399410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. Szyf, M, Weaver, ICG, Champagne, FA, et al. Maternal programming of steroid receptor expression and phenotype through DNA methylation in the rat. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2005; 26, 139162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Szyf, M, Weaver, I, Meaney, M. Maternal care, the epigenome and phenotypic differences in behavior. Reprod Toxicol. 2007; 24, 919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109. Michimae, H, Hangui, J. A trade-off between prey- and predator-induced polyphenisms in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008; 62, 699704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar