Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:29:23.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of maternal exposure to acute stress on birth outcomes: a quasi-experiment study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2021

Asma Ahmed Open the ORCID record for Asma Ahmed [Opens in a new window] ,
Suzanne King ,
Guillaume Elgbeili ,
David P. Laplante  and
Seungmi Yang
Asma Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Suzanne King
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Guillaume Elgbeili
Affiliation:
Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
David P. Laplante
Affiliation:
Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Seungmi Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Seungmi Yang, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown associations between maternal stress and poor birth outcomes, but evidence is unclear for causal inference. Natural disasters provide an opportunity to study effects of quasi-randomized hardship with an accurate measure of onset and duration. In a population-based quasi-experimental study, we examined the effect of maternal exposure to the January 1998 Québec ice storm on birth outcomes by comparing pregnant mothers who lived in an area hard hit by the ice storm with those in two unaffected regions. In a total of 147,349 singleton births between 1995 and 2001, we used a difference-in-differences method to estimate the effects of the ice storm on gestational age at delivery (GA), preterm birth (PTB), weight-for-gestational-age z-scores (BWZ), large for gestational age (LGA), and small for gestational age (SGA). After adjusting for maternal and sociodemographic characteristics, there were no differences between the exposed and the unexposed mothers for birth outcomes. The estimated differences (exposed vs. unexposed) were 0.01 SDs (95% CI: −0.02, 0.05) for BWZ; 0.10% point (95% CI: −0.95%, 1.16%) for SGA; 0.25% point (95% CI: −0.78%, 1.28%) for LGA; −0.01 week (95% CI: −0.07, 0.05) for GA; and 0.16% point (95% CI: −0.66%, 0.97%) for PTB. Neither trimester-specific nor dose–response associations were observed. Overall, exposure to the 1998 Québec ice storm as a proxy for acute maternal stress in pregnancy was not associated with poor birth outcomes. Our results suggest that acute maternal hardship may not have a substantial effect on adverse birth outcomes.

Keywords

Natural experimentsdifferences-in-differences analysisnatural disastersacute maternal stressbirth outcomes
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 471 - 482
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beydoun, H, Saftlas, AF. Physical and mental health outcomes of prenatal maternal stress in human and animal studies: a review of recent evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008; 22 (5), 438–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talge, NM, Neal, C, Glover, V. Antenatal maternal stress and long-term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007; 48 (3-4), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walder, DJ, Laplante, DP, Sousa-Pires, A, Veru, F, Brunet, A, King, S. Prenatal maternal stress predicts autism traits in 6½ year-old children: Project Ice Storm. Psychiatry Res. 2014; 219 (2), 353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, S, Dancause, K, Turcotte-Tremblay, AM, Veru, F, Laplante, DP. Using natural disasters to study the effects of prenatal maternal stress on child health and development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today Rev. 2012; 96 (4), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beversdorf, DQ, Manning, S, Hillier, A, et al. Timing of prenatal stressors and autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005; 35 (4), 471–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Olsen, J, Vestergaard, M, Obel, C. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the offspring following prenatal maternal bereavement: a nationwide follow-up study in Denmark. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 19 (10), 747–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Bergh, BR, van den Heuvel, MI, Lahti, M, et al. Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: the influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 117 (Suppl. 4), 26–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staneva, A, Bogossian, F, Pritchard, M, Wittkowski, A. The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: a systematic review. Women Birth. 2015; 28 (3), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakeel, F, Wisk, LE, Gee, R, Chao, SM, Witt, WP. The balance between stress and personal capital during pregnancy and the relationship with adverse obstetric outcomes: findings from the 2007 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013; 16 (6), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadhwa, PD, Sandman, CA, Porto, M, Dunkel-Schetter, C, Garite, TJ. The association between prenatal stress and infant birth weight and gestational age at birth: a prospective investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169 (4), 858–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, SW, Kingston, D, Bayrampour, H, Dolan, SM, Tough, SC. Cumulative psychosocial stress, coping resources, and preterm birth. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014; 17 (6), 559–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, WP, Cheng, ER, Wisk, LE, et al. Maternal stressful life events prior to conception and the impact on infant birth weight in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104 (S1), S81–S89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, ER, Park, H, Wisk, LE, et al. Examining the link between women’s exposure to stressful life events prior to conception and infant and toddler health: the role of birth weight. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 70 (3), 245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, DA, Ortega-Villa, AM, Grobman, WA, et al. Maternal stress and neonatal anthropometry: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217 (1), 82.e81–82.e87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, CP, Oaks, BM, Laugero, KD, et al. Maternal cortisol and stress are associated with birth outcomes, but are not affected by lipid-based nutrient supplements during pregnancy: an analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial in rural Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15 (1), 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baibazarova, E, van de Beek, C, Cohen-Kettenis, PT, Buitelaar, J, Shelton, KH, van Goozen, SH. Influence of prenatal maternal stress, maternal plasma cortisol and cortisol in the amniotic fluid on birth outcomes and child temperament at 3 months. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013; 38 (6), 907–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Precht, DH, Andersen, PK, Olsen, J. Severe life events and impaired fetal growth: a nation-wide study with complete follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86 (3), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahrer, NE, Guardino, C, Hobel, C, Dunkel Schetter, C. Maternal stress before conception is associated with shorter gestation. Ann Behav Med. 2021; 55 (3), 242–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Class, QA, Khashan, AS, Lichtenstein, P, Långström, N, D’Onofrio, BM. Maternal stress and infant mortality: the importance of the preconception period. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24 (7), 1309–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Class, QA, Mortensen, PB, Henriksen, TB, Dalman, C, D’Onofrio, BM, Khashan, AS. Preconception maternal bereavement and infant and childhood mortality: a Danish population-based study. Psychosom Med. 2015; 77 (8), 863–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, BE, Ha, M, Park, H, et al. Psychosocial work stress during pregnancy and birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011; 25 (3), 246–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, PS, Shah, J. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Womens Health. 2010; 19 (11), 2017–2031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobato, G, Reichenheim, ME, Moraes, CL, Peixoto-Filho, FM, Migowski, LS. Psychologic intimate partner violence and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction in Rio de Janeiro. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 143 (1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayne, SL, Pool, LR, Grobman, WA, Kershaw, KN. Associations of neighbourhood crime with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in Chicago: analysis of electronic health records from 2009 to 2013. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018; 72 (3), 230–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goin, DE, Gomez, AM, Farkas, K, Zimmerman, SC, Matthay, EC, Ahern, J. Exposure to community homicide during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a within-community matched design. Epidemiology. 2019; 30 (5), 713–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomer, A, Buffa, G, Taleo, F, et al. Relationships between psychosocial distress and diet during pregnancy and infant birthweight in a lower-middle income country: ‘Healthy mothers, healthy communities’ study in Vanuatu. Ann Hum Biol. 2018; 45 (3), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancause, KN, Laplante, DP, Oremus, C, Fraser, S, Brunet, A, King, S. Disaster-related prenatal maternal stress influences birth outcomes: Project Ice Storm. Early Hum Dev. 2011; 87 (12), 813–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eiríksdóttir, VH, Ásgeirsdóttir, TL, Bjarnadóttir, RI, Kaestner, R, Cnattingius, S, Valdimarsdóttir, UA. Low birth weight, small for gestational age and preterm births before and after the economic collapse in Iceland: a population based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (12), e80499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torche, F. The effect of maternal stress on birth outcomes: exploiting a natural experiment. Demography. 2011; 48 (4), 1473–1491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabich, SC, Robinson, WR, Engel, SM, Konrad, CE, Richardson, DB, Horney, JA. Hurricane Charley exposure and hazard of preterm delivery, Florida 2004. Matern Child Health J. 2016; 20 (12), 2474–2482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harville, EW, Tran, T, Xu, X, Buekens, P. Population changes, racial/ethnic disparities, and birth outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010; 4 (S1), S39–S45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainstock, T, Shoham-Vardi, I, Glasser, S, Anteby, E, Lerner-Geva, L. Fetal sex modifies effects of prenatal stress exposure and adverse birth outcomes. Stress. 2015; 18 (1), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, E, Adhikari, K, Tomfohr-Madsen, L, Patten, S, Metcalfe, A. Birth outcomes, pregnancy complications, and postpartum mental health after the 2013 Calgary flood: a difference in difference analysis. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (2), e0246670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harville, E, Xiong, X, Buekens, P. Disasters and perinatal health: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65 (11), 713–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddex, L, Dellgar, U. The ice storm in eastern Canada 1998 KAMEDO-Report No. 74. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001; 16 (1), 50–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecomte, EL, Pang, AW, Russell, JW. Ice storm'98, 1998. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. Quebec’s Ice Storm’98: “all cards wild, all rules broken” in Quebec’s shell-shocked hospitals. CMAJ. 1998; 158 (4), 520–524.Google Scholar
Institut de la statistique du Québec. La population des régions administratives du Québec en 2020 2021. B, sociodémographique v, no 2, janvier, L’institut, p. 1-6. [statistique.quebec.ca/fr/fichier/population-regions-administrativesquebec-2020.pdf].Google Scholar
Québec Idlsd. 2016. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/.Google Scholar
Daveluy, C, Pica, L, Audet, N, et al. Enquête sociale et de santé 1998, 2eédition, 2000. Institut de la statistique du Québec, Québec.Google Scholar
King, S, Barr, R, Brunet, A, et al. La tempête de verglas: une occasion d’étudier les effets du stress prénatal chez l’enfant et la mère. Sante Ment Que. 2000; 25 (1), 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auger, N, Kuehne, E, Goneau, M, Daniel, M. Preterm birth during an extreme weather event in Quebec, Canada: a “natural experiment”. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15 (7), 1088–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Platt, RW, Wen, SW, et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001; 108 (2), e35–e35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimick, JB, Ryan, AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014; 312 (22), 2401–2402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strumpf, EC, Harper, S, Kaufman, JS. Fixed effects and difference-in-differences. In Methods in Social Epidemiology (eds. Oakes, JM, Kaufman, JS), 2nd edn., 2017; pp. 341–368. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Riddell, CA, Kaufman, JS, Hutcheon, JA, Strumpf, EC, Teunissen, PW, Abenhaim, HA. Effect of uterine rupture on a hospital’s future rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124 (6), 1175–1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angrist, JD, Pishke, J-S (eds.). Parallel worlds: fixed effects, differences-in-differences, and panel data. In Mostly Harmless Econometrics; An Empiricist’s Companion, 2009; pp. 221–246. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, B, Harper, S, Kaufman, JS. Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 135 (2), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saeed, S, Moodie, EE, Strumpf, EC, Klein, MB. Evaluating the impact of health policies: using a difference-in-differences approach. Int J Public Health. 2019; 64 (4), 637–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, GR, Himes, JH, Kaufman, RB, Mor, J, Kogan, M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87 (2), 163–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endara, SM, Ryan, MA, Sevick, CJ, Conlin, AMS, Macera, CA, Smith, TC. Does acute maternal stress in pregnancy affect infant health outcomes? Examination of a large cohort of infants born after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9 (1), 252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich-Edwards, JW, Kleinman, KP, Strong, EF, Oken, E, Gillman, MW. Preterm delivery in Boston before and after September 11th, 2001. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2005; 16 (3), 323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, J, Rossin-Slater, M. Weathering the storm: hurricanes and birth outcomes. J Health Econ. 2013; 32 (3), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simeonova, E. Out of sight, out of mind? Natural disasters and pregnancy outcomes in the USA. CESifo Econ Stud. 2011; 57 (3), 403–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S, Weinberger, KR, Yan, M, Anderson, GB, Wellenius, GA. Tropical cyclones and risk of preterm birth: a retrospective analysis of 20 million births across 378 US counties. Environ Int. 2020; 140 (438), 105825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, CE, Li, HJ, Zhang, XG, et al. The impact of the Wenchuan earthquake on birth outcomes. PLoS One. 2009; 4 (12), e8200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, X, Harville, EW, Buekens, P, Mattison, DR, Elkind-Hirsch, K, Pridjian, G. Exposure to Hurricane Katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. Am J Med Sci. 2008; 336 (2), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glynn, LM, Wadhwa, PD, Dunkel-Schetter, C, Chicz-DeMet, A, Sandman, CA. When stress happens matters: effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184 (4), 637–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Ahmed et al. supplementary material

Ahmed et al. supplementary material

Download Ahmed et al. supplementary material(File)
File 7.2 MB