Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:18:13.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is maternal periconceptional smoking associated with 2D:4D digit ratio in their children?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2017

M. P. Velez Open the ORCID record for M. P. Velez [Opens in a new window] ,
T. E. Arbuckle ,
P. Monnier  and
W. D. Fraser
M. P. Velez*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
T. E. Arbuckle
Affiliation:
Population Studies Division, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
P. Monnier
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
W. D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
*
*Address for correspondence: M. P. Velez, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 3N6. (Email [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2nd--4th finger ratio (2D:4D) has been proposed as a potential indicator of greater androgen exposure during fetal development. Maternal periconceptional smoking may alter the homeostasis of fetal androgens, which could in turn result in differential development of 2D:4Ds in utero. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of maternal periconceptional smoking (i.e. 1 year before through the first trimester of pregnancy) on the 2D:4D of children within The Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) study. Maternal smoking history was obtained through questionnaires during the first trimester of pregnancy in 2001 women from 10 cities across Canada. The periconceptional smoking prevalence was 12%. A follow-up study was conducted to measure growth and development up to 5 years of age in a subsample of some 800 MIREC children (MIREC-CD Plus), and digital pictures of the ventral surface of both hands were obtained in mothers and children (2–5 years). The 2D:4D was calculated as the ratio of the 2nd and 4th fingers of each hand. Boys had lower mean 2D:4Ds compared with girls in both hands. Age and maternal 2D:4D were strong determinants of the children’s 2D:4D, however, the mean 2D:4D did not differ among children whose mothers had smoked during the periconceptional period compared with those who had not, irrespective of sex. In conclusion, we did not find an association between maternal periconceptional smoking and children’s 2D:4D, although the smoking prevalence was low.

Keywords

Developmental Origins of Health and Diseasedigit ratiosmaternal smokingprenatal androgen exposure
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 8 , Issue 5: Themed Issue: Australian Perspectives: Outcomes from the 2016 ANZ , October 2017 , pp. 597 - 603
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Louis, GM, Cooney, MA, Lynch, CD, Handal, A. Periconception window: advising the pregnancy-planning couple. Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(Suppl.), e119–e121.Google Scholar
2. Juul, A, Almstrup, K, Andersson, AM, et al. Possible fetal determinants of male infertility. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10, 553–562.Google Scholar
3. Jensen, TK, Joffe, M, Scheike, T, et al. Early exposure to smoking and future fecundity among Danish twins. Int J Androl. 2006; 29, 603–613.Google Scholar
4. Malas, MA, Dogan, S, Evcil, EH, Desdicioglu, K. Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Hum Dev. 2006; 82, 469–475.Google Scholar
5. Manning, J, Kilduff, L, Cook, C, Crewther, B, Fink, B. Digit ratio (2D:4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014; 5, 9.Google Scholar
6. Galis, F, Ten Broek, CM, Van Dongen, S, Wijnaendts, LC. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio (2D:4D). Arch Sex Behav. 2010; 39, 57–62.Google Scholar
7. Manning, JT, Scutt, D, Wilson, J, Lewis-Jones, DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13, 3000–3004.Google Scholar
8. Velez, MP, Arbuckle, TE, Monnier, P, Fraser, WD. Female digit length ratio (2D:4D) and time-to-pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31, 2128–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Oh, JK, Kim, KT, Yoon, SJ, Kim, SW, Kim, TB. Second to fourth digit ratio: a predictor of adult testicular volume. Andrology. 2014; 2, 862–867.Google Scholar
10. Klimek, M, Galbarczyk, A, Nenko, I, Alvarado, LC, Jasienska, G. Digit ratio (2D:4D) as an indicator of body size, testosterone concentration and number of children in human males. Ann Hum Biol. 2014; 41, 518–523.Google Scholar
11. Honekopp, J, Bartholdt, L, Beier, L, Liebert, A. Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: new data and a meta-analytic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007; 32, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Firman, RC, Simmons, LW, Cummins, JM, Matson, PL. Are body fluctuating asymmetry and the ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length reliable predictors of semen quality? Hum Reprod. 2003; 18, 808–812.Google Scholar
13. Bang, AK, Carlsen, E, Holm, M, et al. A study of finger lengths, semen quality and sex hormones in 360 young men from the general Danish population. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20, 3109–3113.Google Scholar
14. Manning, JT, Fink, B. Is low digit ratio linked with late menarche? Evidence from the BBC internet study. Am J Hum Biol. 2011; 23, 527–533.Google Scholar
15. Matchock, RL. Low digit ratio (2D:4D) is associated with delayed menarche. Am J Hum Biol. 2008; 20, 487–489.Google Scholar
16. Oberg, AS, Villamor, E. Low digit ratio predicts early age at menarche in Colombian schoolgirls. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012; 26, 448–455.Google Scholar
17. Manning, JT, Fink, B. Digit ratio (2D:4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet Study. Am J Hum Biol. 2008; 20, 451–461.Google Scholar
18. Oswiecimska, JM, Ksiazek, A, Sygulla, K, et al. Androgens concentrations and second-to fourth-digit ratio (2D:4D) in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (21-hydroxylase deficiency). Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2012; 33, 787–791.Google Scholar
19. Cattrall, FR, Vollenhoven, BJ, Weston, GC. Anatomical evidence for in utero androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84, 1689–1692.Google Scholar
20. Lujan, ME, Podolski, AJ, Chizen, DR, Lehotay, DC, Pierson, RA. Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010; 8, 156.Google Scholar
21. Lujan, ME, Bloski, TG, Chizen, DR, Lehotay, DC, Pierson, RA. Digit ratios do not serve as anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25, 204–211.Google Scholar
22. Auger, J, Eustache, F. Second to fourth digit ratios, male genital development and reproductive health: a clinical study among fertile men and testis cancer patients. Int J Androl. 2011; 34(Pt 2), e49–e58.Google Scholar
23. Buck Louis, GM. Fecundity and fertility. In Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology (eds. Buck Louis GM, Platt RW), 2011; pp. 16–61. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
24. Baird, DD, Wilcox, AJ. Cigarette smoking associated with delayed conception. JAMA. 1985; 253, 2979–2983.Google Scholar
25. Ernst, A, Kristensen, SL, Toft, G, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and reproductive health of daughters: a follow-up study spanning two decades. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27, 3593–3600.Google Scholar
26. Weinberg, CR, Wilcox, AJ, Baird, DD. Reduced fecundability in women with prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129, 1072–1078.Google Scholar
27. Smith, LM, Cloak, CC, Poland, RE, Torday, J, Ross, MG. Prenatal nicotine increases testosterone levels in the fetus and female offspring. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003; 5, 369–374.Google Scholar
28. Kandel, DB, Udry, JR. Prenatal effects of maternal smoking on daughters’ smoking: nicotine or testosterone exposure? Am J Public Health. 1999; 89, 1377–1383.Google Scholar
29. Rizwan, S, Manning, JT, Brabin, BJ. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and possible effects of in utero testosterone: evidence from the 2D:4D finger length ratio. Early Hum Dev. 2007; 83, 87–90.Google Scholar
30. Arbuckle, TE, Fraser, WD, Fisher, M, et al. Cohort profile: the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals research platform. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013; 27, 415–425.Google Scholar
31. Brand, JS, Chan, MF, Dowsett, M, et al. Cigarette smoking and endogenous sex hormones in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96, 3184–3192.Google Scholar
32. Honekopp, J, Watson, S. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. Am J Hum Biol. 2010; 22, 619–630.Google Scholar
33. Zheng, Z, Cohn, MJ. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108, 16289–16294.Google Scholar
34. McIntyre, MH, Ellison, PT, Lieberman, DE, Demerath, E, Towne, B. The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 272, 1473–1479.Google ScholarPubMed
35. Manning, JT, Barley, L, Walton, J, et al. The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evol Hum Behav. 2000; 21, 163–183.Google Scholar
36. Vink, JM, Boomsma, DI. Interplay between heritability of smoking and environmental conditions? A comparison of two birth cohorts. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11, 316.Google Scholar
37. Manning, JT, Fink, B. Digit ratio, nicotine and alcohol intake and national rates of smoking and alcohol consumption. Pers Indiv Dif. 2011; 50, 344–348.Google Scholar
38. Colapinto, CK, Arbuckle, TE, Dubois, L, Fraser, W. Is there a relationship between tea intake and maternal whole blood heavy metal concentrations? J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016; 26, 503–509.Google Scholar
39. Manning, JT, Fink, B, Neave, N, Caswell, N. Photocopies yield lower digit ratios (2D:4D) than direct finger measurements. Arch Sex Behav. 2005; 34, 329–333.Google Scholar
40. Ribeiro, E, Neave, N, Morais, RN, Manning, JT. Direct versus indirect measurement of digit ratio (2D:4D): a critical review of the literature and new data. Evol Psychol. 2016; 14, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Allaway, HC, Bloski, TG, Pierson, RA, Lujan, ME. Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans. Am J Hum Biol. 2009; 21, 365–370.Google Scholar
42. Fraser, A, McNally, W, Sattar, N, et al. Prenatal exposures and anti-Mullerian hormone in female adolescents: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178, 1414–1423.Google Scholar
43. Hart, R, Sloboda, DM, Doherty, DA, et al. Prenatal determinants of uterine volume and ovarian reserve in adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94, 4931–4937.Google Scholar
44. Hakonsen, LB, Ernst, A, Ramlau-Hansen, CH. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and reproductive health in children: a review of epidemiological studies. Asian J Androl. 2014; 16, 39–49.Google Scholar