Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-fcbfl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T04:39:37.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2025

Jie Ma
Affiliation:
Jinhe Center for Economic Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Xiaojun Yang*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Yuxuan Fei
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaojun Yang; Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Although fertility is typically regarded as a unitary family decision, a meaningful degree of disagreement in fertility willingness exists within households, especially for having two or more children. As China transitioned from a one-child to multiple-child policy, understanding how such disagreement affects fertility decisions is crucial. Using household data from the 2016 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, we analyze fertility willingness in married couples. We find that over 10% of families disagree on having two or more children. Disagreement negatively impacts plans to have more children: only the husband wanting two children significantly reduces fertility plans compared to mutual agreement, while only the wife wanting two children does not suppress the plan. This is consistent with the wife's veto power in fertility decisions. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that more equal gender role and higher bargaining power contribute to the wife's veto power, offering insights into the mechanism of intra-household fertility decisions.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Université catholique de Louvain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179211.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29(8), 203232.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., Field, E., & Lee, J. (2014). Household bargaining and excess fertility: An experimental study in Zambia. American Economic Review, 104(7), 22102237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankole, A. (1995). Desired fertility and fertility behaviour among the Yoruba of Nigeria: A study of couple preferences and subsequent fertility. Population Studies, 49(2), 317328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudin, T., De La Croix, D., & Gobbi, P. E. (2015). Fertility and childlessness in the United States. American Economic Review, 105(6), 18521882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813846.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Testa, M.-R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioral control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 439465.Google Scholar
Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(1), 6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, L. C., & Chang, M. C. (1981). Do husbands and wives agree? Fertility attitudes and later behavior. Population and Environment, 4(2), 109127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Albis, H., Gobbi, P. E., & Greulich, A. (2017). Having a second child and access to childcare: Evidence from European countries. Journal of Demographic Economics, 83(2), 177210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M., & Kindermann, F. (2019). Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. American Economic Review, 109(9), 32643306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M., & Tertilt, M. (2018). Women's empowerment, the gender gap in desired fertility, and fertility outcomes in developing countries. AEA Papers and Proceedings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eswaran, M. (2002). The empowerment of women, fertility, and child mortality: Towards a theoretical analysis. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 433454.Google Scholar
Ge, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). The effect of housing price on family fertility decision in China. Population Research, 43(1), 52 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Gipson, J. D., & Hindin, M. J. (2009). The effect of husbands’ and wives’ fertility preferences on the likelihood of a subsequent pregnancy, Bangladesh 1998–2003. Population Studies, 63(2), 135146.Google ScholarPubMed
Hener, T. (2015). Do couples bargain over fertility? Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, (117/118), 211231.Google Scholar
Islam, M. M., & Bairagi, R. (2003). Fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour in Matlab: Do fertility intentions matter? Journal of Biosocial Science, 35(4), 615619.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2011). Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: Identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography, 48(4), 15351557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Xu, X. (2022). Fertility intentions for a second child and their influencing factors in contemporary China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., & Liu, T. (2020). Two-child policy, gender income and fertility choice in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 10711081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnier, A. (1989). Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. A longitudinal study: 1974, 1976, 1979. Population, 44(1), 237259.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, A., Leonard, W., Reyes-García, V., McDade, T., Huanca, T., Tanner, S., & Vadez, V. (2007). Parental preference, bargaining power, and child nutritional status: Evidence from the Bolivian Amazon. Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study Working Paper, 31, 134.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., & Jin, Y. (2018). Women's fertility autonomy in urban China: The role of couple dynamics under the universal two-child policy. Chinese Sociological Review, 50(3), 275309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasul, I. (2008). Household bargaining over fertility: Theory and evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Development Economics, 86(2), 215241.Google Scholar
Siegel, C. (2017). Female relative wages, household specialization and fertility. Review of Economic Dynamics, 24, 152174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, J., Jin, Y., & Wu, L. (2019). Impact of couple's sex preference on family's second-child intentions. Population Research, 43(3), 31 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tan, P. C., & Tey, N. P. (1994). Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? Evidence from Peninsular Malaysia. Studies in Family Planning, 25(4), 222231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testa, M. R., Cavalli, L., & Rosina, A. (2014). The effect of couple disagreement about child-timing intentions: A parity-specific approach. Population and Development Review, 40(1), 3153.Google Scholar
Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34(3), 343354.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography, 35(3), 315322.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomson, E., McDonald, E., & Bumpass, L. L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography, 27(4), 579588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Y., Gan, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023). Whose preference matters more? Couple's fertility preferences and realization in the context of China's two-child policy. Journal of Family Issues, 45(2), 471501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Wen, Q., Ma, J., & Li, J. (2020). Upward mobility and the demand for children: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 60, 101393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ma et al. supplementary material

Ma et al. supplementary material
Download Ma et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.3 KB