Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:21:51.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hong Kong wives say no to a big family—educational pairings and fertility in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2022

Skylar Biyang Sun  and
Xiaohang Zhao Open the ORCID record for Xiaohang Zhao [Opens in a new window]
Skylar Biyang Sun
Affiliation:
School of International Development and Cooperation, University of International Business and Economics, No. 10, Huixin Dongjie, Beijing, Chaoyang District, China
Xiaohang Zhao*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Social Development, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Science and Research Building, No. 5, Jianguomennei Street, Beijing 100732, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We used the 2016 Hong Kong Census data and the diagonal reference model to investigate the effects of partners' educational pairings on fertility in Hong Kong. Our findings suggest a negative relationship between couples' educational achievements and their fertility. Moreover, males' educational attainment is more consequential of whether having children or not and both males' and females' educational attainments are determinants of the number of children to raise. In addition, the more educated a wife is relative to her husband, the less likely the couple is to have children. Once these educationally hypogamous couples have at least one child, they tend to have fewer children than their homogamous counterparts. By contrast, couples with a relatively more educated male are more likely to have children and tend to rear more children than those in educationally homogamous marriages.

Keywords

diagonal reference modeleducational pairingfertilityHong Kong

JEL classification

N35: Asia including Middle East J12: Marriage • Marital Dissolution • Family Structure • Domestic Abuse J13: Fertility • Family Planning • Child Care • Children • Youth J16: Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , First View , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Jacqueline (2016) Why do women want children? The case of Hong Kong, China: a lowest-low fertility context. Marriage & Family Review 52(7), 632–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, Icek and Klobas, Jane (2013) Fertility intentions: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research 29, 203–232.Google Scholar
Anderson, Thomas and Kohler, Hans-Peter (2013) Education fever and the East Asian fertility puzzle: a case study of low fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies 9(2), 196–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barthold, Julia A., Myrskylä, Mikko and Jones, Owen R. (2012) Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(6), 628–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basten, Stuart (2015) Understanding ultra-low fertility in Hong Kong. In Ronald R., Rindfuss and Minja Kim, Choe (eds.), Low and Lower Fertility, 63–86. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudin, Thomas, De la Croix, David and Gobbi, Paula (2020) Endogenous childlessness and stages of development. Journal of the European Economic Association 18(1), 83–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1993) Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy 101(3), 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (2009) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard university press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Lewis, H. Gregg (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 2), S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, Sunnee, Drefahl, Sven and Ghilagaber, Gebrenegus (2018) An application of diagonal reference models and time-varying covariates in social mobility research on mortality and fertility. Social Science Research 75, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, James L. and Kessler, Karen L. (1999) More status or more children? Social status, fertility reduction, and long-term fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20(4), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Mary O'Malley (1989) The income–fertility relationship: effect of the net price of a child. Demography 26(2), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Census and Statistics Department (2017) Demographic trends in Hong Kong 1986–2016.Google Scholar
Chan, C. H. Y., Chan, T. H. Y., Peterson, B. D., Lampic, Claudia and Tam, M. Y. J. (2015) Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples. Human Reproduction 30(2), 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, Lee (1991) Human behavioral ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology 20(1), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Croix, David and Delavallade, Clara (2018) Religions, fertility, and growth in Southeast Asia. International Economic Review 59(2), 907–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Otis Dudley (2018) Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Social Mobility. New York, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edin, Kathryn and Kefalas, Maria (2005) Unmarried with children. Contexts 4(2), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta (2009) Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women's New Roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Fieder, Martin and Huber, Susanne (2007) The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(6), 392–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Debra, Hechter, Michael and Kanazawa, Satoshi (1994) A theory of the value of children. Demography 31(3), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldscheider, Frances, Bernhardt, Eva and Brandén, Maria (2013) Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research 29, 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugushvili, A., Zhao, Y. and Bukodi, E. (2020) Intergenerational educational mobility and smoking: a study of 20 European countries using diagonal reference models. Public Health 181, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurven, Michael and Von Rueden, Christopher (2006) Hunting, social status and biological fitness. Social Biology 53(1–2), 81–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Hank, Karsten, Kreyenfeld, Michaela and Spieß, C. Katharina (2004) Kinderbetreuung und Fertilität in Deutschland/Child care and fertility in Germany. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33(3), 228–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickx, John, De Graaf, Nan Dirk, Lammers, Jan and Ultee, Wout (1993) Models for status inconsistency and mobility: a comparison of the approaches by Hope and Sobel with the mainstream square additive model. Quality and Quantity 27(4), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Keith (1975) Models of status inconsistency and social mobility effects. American Sociological Review 40(3), 322–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, James S. (1978) Facets and flaws of Hope's diamond model. American Sociological Review 43(3), 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Elton F. (1962) Status consistency and symptoms of stress. American Sociological Review 27(4), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalovaara, Marika and Miettinen, Anneli (2013) Does his paycheck also matter? The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland. Demographic Research 28, 881–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Lei, Tam, Tony and Tao, Lin (2019) Well-off but powerless? Status incongruence and psychological well-being in contemporary China. Social Science & Medicine 235, 112345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, Caspar (2018) DRM: Stata module to fit Sobel's Diagonal Reference Model (DRM).Google Scholar
Kane, Emily W (1995) Education and beliefs about gender inequality. Social Problems 42(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. Agnes and Chen, Katherine HY (2014) Stancetaking and the Hong Kong Girl in a shifting heterosexual marketplace. Discourse & Society 25(2), 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koytcheva, Elena and Philipov, Dimiter (2008) Bulgaria: ethnic differentials in rapidly declining fertility. Demographic Research 19, 361–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravdal, Øystein and Rindfuss, Ronald R. (2008) Changing relationships between education and fertility: a study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 73(5), 854–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreyenfeld, Michaela (2010) Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review 26(3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. H., Kuo, B. J., Huang, L. S., Wang, Y. M. and Lee, M. S. (2000) Psychosocial responses among infertile women in different stages of an IVF treatment program. The Journal of Nursing Research 8(5), 515–528.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, Ron (1998) On theory development: applications to the study of family formation. Population and Development Review 24(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Ling Sze (2011) The low-fertility problem in Hong Kong: do mainlanders-births help to rejuvenate low-fertility problem? International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 5(5), 674–680.Google Scholar
McDonald, Peter (2000) Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of the Australian Population Association 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, Danielle Xiaodan (2020) Partners' educational pairings and fertility intentions in the United States: evidence from 2015–2017 national survey of family growth. Social Currents 7(4), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myong, Sunha, Park, JungJae and Yi, Junjian (2021) Social norms and fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association 19(5), 2429–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. H., Yam, N. and Lai, J. (2007) The bicultural self of Chinese in Hong Kong. In Liu, J., Ward, C. and Bernardo, A. (eds.), Casting the Individual in Societal and Cultural Contexts: Social and Societal Psychology for Asia and the Pacific, 105–122. Seoul, Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa.Google Scholar
Nitsche, Natalie, Matysiak, Anna, Van Bavel, Jan and Vignoli, Daniele (2018) Partners' educational pairings and fertility across Europe. Demography 55(4), 1195–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade (1988) A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3), 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade (1994) Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2), 293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade (1997) Women's employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1), 431–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiewalska, Beata (2017) Childlessness and fertility by couples' educational (in) equality in Austria, Bulgaria, and France. Demographic Research 37, 325–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiewalska, Beata (2018) Partners' empowerment and fertility in ten European countries. Demographic Research 38(49), 1495–1534. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panayotova, Evelina and Brayfield, April (1997) National context and gender ideology: attitudes toward women's employment in Hungary and the United States. Gender & Society 11(5), 627–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassler, Sharon and Goldscheider, Frances (2004) Revisiting Jane Austen's theory of marriage timing: changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues 25(2), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirbekk, Vegard (2008) Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research 18, 145–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Michael E. (1981) Diagonal mobility models: a substantively motivated class of designs for the analysis of mobility effects. American Sociological Review 46(6), 893–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Michael E. (1985) Social mobility and fertility revisited: some new models for the analysis of the mobility effects hypothesis. American Sociological Review 50, 699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobotka, Tomáš (2015) Low fertility in Austria and the Czech Republic: Gradual policy adjustments, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Ann Marie (1989) Husbands' and wives' characteristics and fertility decisions: a diagonal mobility model. Demography 26(1), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testa, Maria Rita (2014) On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research 21, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomás, Maria Carolina (2011) Educational assortative mating and fertility in Brazil. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.Google Scholar
Torr, Berna Miller and Short, Susan E. (2004) Second births and the second shift: a research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review 30(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchikoshi, Fumiya (2018) Heterogeneous fertility behavior among highly educated women in Japan: The effect of educational assortative mating on first and second childbirth using diagonal reference model.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, Ushma D., Gipson, Jessica D., Withers, Mellissa, Lewis, Shayna, Ciaraldi, Erica J., Fraser, Ashley, Huchko, Megan J. and Prata, Ndola (2014) Women's empowerment and fertility: a review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 115, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Kaa, Dirk J. (1987) Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1), 1–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Van der Waal, Jeroen, Daenekindt, Stijn and de Koster, Willem (2017) Statistical challenges in modelling the health consequences of social mobility: the need for diagonal reference models. International Journal of Public Health 62(9), 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Rueden, Christopher, Gurven, Michael and Kaplan, Hillard (2011) Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1715), 2223–2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkler-Dworak, Maria and Toulemon, Laurent (2007) Gender differences in the transition to adulthood in France: is there convergence over the recent period? European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 23(3), 273–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Donald M. (1960) Husbands & Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press; London: Collier-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wong, Siu-Lun (1986) Modernization and Chinese culture in Hong Kong. The China Quarterly 106, 306–325.Google Scholar
Wong, Odalia and Chau, Beatrice (2006) The evolving role of filial piety in eldercare in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Social Science 34(4), 600–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The World Bank (2021) Fertility rate, total (births per woman).Google Scholar
Yeh, Kuang-Hui, Yi, Chin-Chun, Tsao, Wei-Chun and Wan, Po-San (2013) Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: a comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology 28(3), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Junjian and Zhang, Junsen (2010) The effect of house price on fertility: evidence from Hong Kong. Economic Inquiry 48(3), 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Paul S. F., Lee, Joseph, Chan, Beda and Au, Jade (2001) A study of demographic changes under sustained below-replacement fertility in Hong Kong SAR. Social Science & Medicine 53(8), 1003–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Xiaohang and Sun, Skylar Biyang (2021) Partners’ educational pairings and subjective well-being in China: an analysis using the diagonal mobility model. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X211038068.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sun and Zhao supplementary material

Sun and Zhao supplementary material

Download Sun and Zhao supplementary material(File)
File 19.9 KB