Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:07:49.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A MORE MEASURED APPROACH: AN EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT MEASURES OF MARRIAGE RATES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FAMILY ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2018

Mary Ann Bronson  and
Maurizio Mazzocco
Mary Ann Bronson*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Maurizio Mazzocco
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
*
Address Correspondence to: Mary Ann Bronson, Department of Economics, Georgetown University, Intercultural Center 580, 37th and O Streets, N.W., Washington D.C. 20057; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract:

Marriage patterns can be well understood only if researchers employ measures of marriage rates that are appropriate for the question asked. In this paper, we provide evidence that the two classes of measures typically used in the literature, the number of new marriages per population and the share of individuals currently or ever married within an age range, generally lead to misleading inference when used to study the probability someone marries during his or her life or fertile life, how it evolves, and how it differs across populations. An alternative measure, the share of individuals ever married in a given cohort by a given age, is better suited for such studies. When researchers are interested in year-on-year changes in marriage probabilities of singles, age-specific marriage hazards are more reliable than population-based measures. We conclude by discussing implications of our findings for studies of the drivers and consequences of marriage formation.

Keywords

marriagemarriage ratemarriage hazardhousehold formation
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 189 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramitzky, Ran, Delavande, Adeline, and Vasconcelos, Luis (2011) Marrying up: The role of sex ratio in assortative matching. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3, 124–157.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A., Yellen, Janet L., and Katz, Michael L. (1996) An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akers, Donalds (1967) On measuring the marriage squeeze. Demography 4, 907–924.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. and Lavy, Victor (1996) The Effect of Teen Childbearing and Single Parenthood on Childhood Disabilities and Progress in School. NBER working paper No. 5807.Google Scholar
Angrist, Josh (2002) How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 997–1038.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1973) A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronson, Mary Ann and Mazzocco, Maurizio (2016) Cohort Size and the Marriage Market: Explaining Nearly a Century of Changes in U.S. Marriage Rates. CCPR working paper No. PWP-CCPR-2012-013.Google Scholar
Caucutt, Elizabeth, Guner, Nezih, and Knowles, John (2002) Why do women wait? Matching, wage, inequality, and the incentives for fertility delay. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 815–855.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. (1981) Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J. (1971) Age patterns of marriage. Population Studies 25, 193–214.Google Scholar
Coontz, Stephanie (2005) Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Doepke, Matthias, Hazan, Moshe, and Maoz, Yishay (2015) The baby boom and World War II: A macroeconomic analysis. Review of Economic Studies 82, 1031–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, Matthias and Tertilt, Michèle (2016) Families in macroeconomics. Handbook of Macroeconomics 2, 1789–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, David T. and Crane, Jonathan (1990) Family change among Black Americans: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 65–84.Google Scholar
Flood, Sarah, King, Miriam, Ruggles, Steven, and Warren, John Robert (2017) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 5.0 [dataset] Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua R. and Kenney, Catherine T. (2001) Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66, 506–519.Google Scholar
Gould, Eric and Paserman, Daniele (2003) Waiting for Mr. right: Rising inequality and declining marriage rates. Journal of Urban Economics 53, 257–281.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Jeremy and Guner, Nezih (2009) Marriage and divorce since World War II: Analyzing the role of technological progress on the formation of households. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 23, 231–276.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Jeremy, Guner, Nezih, and Vandenbroucke, Guillaume (2017) Family economics writ large. Journal of Economic Literature 55, 1346–1434.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jonathan (2004) Is making divorce easier bad for children? The long-run implications of unilateral divorce. Journal of Labor Economics 22, 799–833.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John (1953) Age at marriage and proportions marrying. Population Studies 7, 111–136.Google Scholar
Jalovaara, Marika (2003) The joint effects of marriage partners socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography 40, 67–81.Google Scholar
Killingsworth, Mark R. and Heckman, James J. (1986) Female labor supply: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, pp. 103–204, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lichter, Daniel T., McLaughlin, Diane K., Kephart, George, and Landry, David J. (1992) Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review 57, 781–799.Google Scholar
McLanahan, Sara and Percheski, Christine (2008) Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34, 257–76.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert A. (2000) Welfare benefits and female headship in U.S. time series. American Economic Review 90, 373–377.Google Scholar
Myers, Caitlin Knowles (2017) The power of abortion policy: Re-examining the effects of young women’s access to reproductive control. Journal of Political Economy 125, 2178–2224.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade (1997) Womens employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model of marriage. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, Samuel, Heuveline, Patrick, and Guillot, Michel (2001) Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Genadek, Katie, Goeken, Ronald, Grover, Josiah, and Sobek, Matthew (2017) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Schoen, Robert (1983) Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze. Demography 20, 61–78.Google Scholar
Shryock, Henry S., Siegel, Jacob S., and Larmon, Elizabeth A. (1973) The Methods and Materials of Demography. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Betsey and Wolfers, Justin (2007) Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, Megan M. (2002) Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review 67, 132–147.Google Scholar
Wang, Wendy and Parker, Kim C. (2014) Record Share of Americans Have Never Married: As Values, Economics and Gender Patterns Change. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, Social & Demographic Trends Project.Google Scholar