Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:03:24.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of strip tests for the rapid screening of ethanol residues in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Rafael Fagnani ,
Fernanda Montanholi de Lira  and
Carla Prado Rosolem
Rafael Fagnani*
Affiliation:
Science and Technology of Milk and Dairy Products Master's Degree. Unopar University, Marselha Street 591, Londrina, PR, 86041-140, Brazil
Fernanda Montanholi de Lira
Affiliation:
Science and Technology of Milk and Dairy Products Master's Degree. Unopar University, Marselha Street 591, Londrina, PR, 86041-140, Brazil
Carla Prado Rosolem
Affiliation:
Science and Technology of Milk and Dairy Products Master's Degree. Unopar University, Marselha Street 591, Londrina, PR, 86041-140, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Rafael Fagnani, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experiments reported in this Research Communication aimed to determine if a domestic strip test to detect ethanol residues in breast milk (Milkscreen®) is comparable to a previously established official method for detecting ethanol residues in milk. The two methods are examined in terms of overall sensitivity, robustness against storage and acidity and selectivity against formaldehyde residues. Here, Milkscreen® provided advantages, with faster results (2 min), good sensitivity (≥0.017%), no false results due formaldehyde residues and equal robustness against storage, but with lower sensitivity in acid milk samples. In summary, strip tests for the rapid detection of ethanol residues in breast milk can be used for screening purposes by dairy manufacturers, combining it with the official method to make a final diagnosis.

Keywords

Adulterationalcoholfrauddetection
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 464 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, AS, Pires, VCF, Barbosa, AS, Canuto, TM, Araújo, P and Nunes, LS (2007) Características físico-químicas e microbiológicas do leite cru e pasteurizado consumido no município de queimadas, PB. Anais do I Congresso Norte-Nordeste de Química, Natal, 2007 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Brasil (2018 a) Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Manual de Métodos Oficiais para Análise de Alimentos de Origem Animal. Brasília, Distrito Federal: Diário Oficial da União (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Brasil (2018 b) Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n° 77 de novembro de 2018. Brasília, Distrito Federal: Diário Oficial da União (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Christopher, T and Zeccardi, J (1992). Evaluation of the Q.E.D.™ saliva alcohol test: a new, rapid, accurate device for measuring ethanol in saliva. Annals of Emergency Medicine 21, 1135–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globo (2013) Leite era adulterado com água de poço e em locais sem higiene no RS [Online]. RBST TV, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: Globo. Available at http://g1.globo.com/rs/rio-grande-do-sul/noticia/2013/05/leite-era-adulterado-com-agua-de-poco-e-em-locais-sem-higiene-no-rs.html (Accessed 6 June 2019).Google Scholar
Mareze, J, Marioto, LRM, Gonzaga, N, Daniel, GC, Tamanini, R and Beloti, V (2015) Detecção de adulterações do leite pasteurizado por meio de provas oficiais. Semina Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde 36, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tojo, G and Fernández, M. (2006) Oxidation of Alcohols to Aldehydes and Ketones. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wanjala, GW, Mathooko, FM, Kutima, PM and Mathara, JM (2018) Prevalence of adulteration and inhibitory substances in raw and pasteurized milk marketed in Nairobi region. Asian Food Science 2, 1–8.Google Scholar