Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T18:38:13.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of light scattering techniques to study the kinetics of precipitation of mineral acid casein from skim milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Mark S. Jablonka ,
Peter A. Munro  and
Geoffrey G. Duffy
Mark S. Jablonka
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Peter A. Munro
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Geoffrey G. Duffy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two light scattering methods for monitoring the precipitation of casein from skim milk (9% w/w) with mineral acid are presented. Experiments were carried out at precipitation temperatures in the range 25–53 °C and precipitation pH values in the range 3·9–5·1. The initial stages of precipitation were explored using a light fibre optics system attached to a closed-loop acid/milk mixing system. The later stages of particle formation and growth were examined using a laser doppler anemometer attached to an open-pipe flow system. It was found that there was a lag initially, followed by a period of rapid particle growth. During a third phase a dynamic equilibrium between particle growth, break-up and shrinkage was established. A model for isoelectric casein precipitation based on these observations is proposed and discussed.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, D. J., Hoare, M. & Dunnill, P. 1983 The formation of protein precipitates and their centrifugal recovery. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 26 1–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgleish, D. G. & Parker, T. G. 1979 Quantitation of αs1-casein aggregation by use of polyfunctional models. Journal of Dairy Research 46 259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, G. G. 1978 a Measuring techniques for fibre flocculation and formation studies in the paper industry. Automation and Control 8 40–43Google Scholar
Duffy, G. G. 1978 b An investigation of the mass distribution (Sheet formation) of paper sheets. School of Engineering Report No. 183, University of AucklandGoogle Scholar
Duffy, G. G. 1978 c Measurement of fibre flocculation using fibre optics and the optical system of a laser doppler anemometer. School of Engineering Report No. 189, University of AucklandGoogle Scholar
Hoare, M. 1982 Protein precipitation and precipitate ageing. Part I. Salting-out and ageing of casein precipitates. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers 60 79–87Google Scholar
Horne, D. S. 1979 The kinetics of the precipitation of chemically modified αs1-casein by calcium. Journal of Dairy Research 46 265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, M. S. & Munro, P. A. 1985 Particle size distribution and calcium content of batch-precipitated acid casein curd: effect of precipitation temperature and pH. Journal of Dairy Research 52 419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, M. S. & Munro, P. A. 1986 a Development of an objective method for assessing the mechanical strength of casein curd. Journal of Dairy Research 53 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, M. S. & Munro, P. A. 1986 b Effect of precipitation temperature and pH on the mechanical strength of batch precipitated acid casein curd. Journal of Dairy Research 53 69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, M. S. & Munro, P. A. 1986 c Effect of precipitation temperature and pH on the continuous pilot-scale precipitation of acid casein curd. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 21 111–123Google Scholar
Jenness, R. & Patton, S. 1959 Principles of Dairy Chemistry, pp. 308–310New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Muller, L. L. 1982 Manufacture of casein, caseinates and co-precipitates. In Developments in Dairy Chemistry – 1. Proteins, pp. 315–337 (Ed Fox, P. F.). London: Applied Science Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
Muller, L. L. & Hayes, J. F. 1962 Improved equipment for continuous precipitation of acid casein. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 17 189–193Google Scholar
Nerelius, L., Norman, B. & Wahren, D. 1972 Measurement of flocculation characteristics by light reflection. Tappi 55 574–580Google Scholar
Norman, B. G., Moller, K., Ek, R. & Duffy, G. G. 1978 Hydrodynamics of papermaking fibres in water suspension. In Fibre–Water Interactions in Paper Making, vol. 1, pp. 195–249. London: British Paper and Board Industry FederationGoogle Scholar
O'Meara, G. M. & Munro, P. A. 1982 The precipitation and shrinkage of acid casein curd: a preliminary study. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 17 147–159Google Scholar
Parker, T. G. & Dalgleish, D. G. 1977 a The use of light-scattering and turbidity measurements to study the kinetics of extensively aggregating proteins: αs1-casein. Biopolymers 16 2533–2547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, T. G. & Dalgleish, D. G. 1977 b The potential application of the theory of branching processes to the association of milk protein. Journal of Dairy Research 44 79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajput, Y. S., Bhavadasan, M. K. & Ganguli, N. C. 1983 Changes in the chemical status of calcium in casein micelles with the pH of milk. Milchwissenschaft 38 211–213Google Scholar
Southward, C. R. & Aird, R. M. 1978 Co-precipitates and their application in food products. I. Observations on the manufacture of co-precipitates. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 13 77–96Google Scholar
Southward, C. R. & Walker, N. J. 1980 The manufacture and industrial use of casein. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 15 201–217Google Scholar