Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:13:09.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the laboratory soiling of milking equipment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Branca Bačić
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Christina M. Cousins
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
L. F. L. Clegg
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Summary

A laboratory method has been developed for studying the action of chemical disinfectants on milking equipment using a wet film and both metal and rubber surfaces. It was shown that milking machines may be soiled as effectively with fresh milk of low bacterial content as with aged milk of high bacterial content. When a single heat treatment preceded the soiling with milk and subsequent treatment with detergent and chemical disinfectant, a build-up of bacteria began on the third day. However, when the surfaces were heat treated daily 18 h before soiling, followed by cleaning and disinfection, no build-up occurred. These findings support the hypothesis that contamination of milk results from bacteria developing on the milking equipment and not merely from those added to it at each milking. The sites of bacterial contamination were shown to be the under surfaces of lid gaskets and the joints of the short milk tubes and the metal clawpiece nipples.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association (1960). Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products. 11th edn.New York: Am. Publ. Hlth Assn., Inc.Google Scholar
Bačić, B. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1967). Milchwissenschaft 22, 615.Google Scholar
Bačić, B., Jackson, H. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claydon, T. J. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, L. F. L. (1955). J. appl. Bad. 18, 358.Google Scholar
Clegg, L. F. L. (1962). Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 48, p. 183Google Scholar
Cousins, C. M. (1967). J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 20, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvie, E. I. & Clarke, P. M. (1955). J. appl. Bact. 18, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetchius, G. R. & Botwright, W. A. (1950). J. Milk Fd Technol. 13, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiteras, A. F. & Shapiro, R. L. (1946). J. Bact. 52, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, W. A. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1953). Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. 16, i.Google Scholar
Weber, G. R. & Black, L. A. (1948). Am. J. publ. Hlth 38, 90.Google Scholar