Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:26:04.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural changes in whole milk during the production of sterile concentrates: an electron microscope study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

P. W. Board
Affiliation:
Division of Food Preservation, C.S.I.R.O., Ryde, N.S.W., Australia
Joan M. Bain
Affiliation:
Division of Food Preservation, C.S.I.R.O., Ryde, N.S.W., Australia
D. W. Gove
Affiliation:
Division of Food Preservation, C.S.I.R.O., Ryde, N.S.W., Australia
J. T. Mullett
Affiliation:
Hunter Valley Co-operative Dairy Co. Ltd, Hexham, N.S.W., Australia

Summary

Electron microscopy was used to study the effect of addition of NaOH, forewarming, homogenization, concentration, and heat sterilization on the structure of whole milk during the production of 4 heat-sterilized concentrates that showed different degrees of physical stability. The samples were prepared for electron microscopy by adding fixative either to liquid or freeze-dried material, and then embedding for sectioning.

Noticeable structural changes occurred during forewarming of samples containing added NaOH, during homogenization, and during heat sterilization. Addition of NaOH and forewarming decreased the closeness of packing of the subunits in the casein micelles. Homogenization reduced the average size of the fat globules, and protein became attached to their surfaces. Heat sterilization caused coalescence of protein. In non-homogenized sterilized concentrate with added NaOH, protein bodies of about 100 times the volume of the original casein micelles were formed; these were free-floating and the concentrate was stable. In non-homogenized sterilized concentrate with no added NaOH the protein bodies were about 15 times the size of the casein micelles and bridged to each other, thereby forming a sediment consisting of large irregular particles. Very large protein bodies containing fat globules formed during heat sterilization of the homogenized samples, both in the presence and in the absence of NaOH, and were responsible for the formation of sediment in these 2 products.

Needle crystals observed in most samples were identifed as CaCO3. H2O by selected area diffraction; KC1 crystals were also detected.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Society for Testing and Materials (1962). Spec. tech. Publs Am. Soc. Test. Mater, no. 48-L.Google Scholar
Board, P. W. & Mullett, J. T. (1970). J. Dairy Res. 37, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 287.Google Scholar
Calapaj, G. G. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. J., Thompson, M. P. & Nutting, G. C. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggmann, H. (1969). Milchwissenschaft 24, 479.Google Scholar
Knoop, E., Wortmann, A. & Knoop, A.-M. (1958). Naturwissenschaften 45, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, J. H. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 353.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E. S. (1963). J. Cell Biol. 17, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 171.Google Scholar
Sawyer, W. H. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. (1968). Ned Melk- en Zuiveltijdschr. 22, 40.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. & Buchheim, W. (1968). Milchwissenschaft 23, 505.Google Scholar
Shimmin, P. D. & Hill, R. D. (1964). J. Dairy Res. 31, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimmim, P. D. & Hill, R. D. (1965). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 20, 119.Google Scholar