Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:37:41.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection and some properties of phage-resistant starters for cheese-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. J. Marshall
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
N. J. Berridge
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

Clones of Streptococcus lactis and of Str. cremoris resistant to some bacteriophages that could virtually annihilate the parent strains were selected by plating very large numbers of the bacteria in the presence of the phage. Some of the resistant strains were shown to form acid rapidly in milk and to be satisfactory for cheese-making. They were not lysogenic. Adsorption of the phage to which the parent culture had been sensitive still occurred with 3 strains but not with 4 others. Rates of mutation from phage sensitivity to phage resistance were determined for 2 original strains of Str. lactis and were found to be of the same order as the rates quoted in the literature for other mutations. The mutation rates of phages to forms which could attack the resistant strains were too low to be measured.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. H. (1959). Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. B. & Meanwell, L. J. (1942). Journal of Dairy Research 13, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. R. & Burnett, J. (1972). Dairy Industries 37, 207.Google Scholar
Czulak, J. & Naylor, J. (1956). Journal of Dairy Research 23, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J. W. (1969). The Molecular Basis of Mutation, p. 45. San Francisco, Calif.: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Erskine, J. M. (1970). Applied Microbiology 19, 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvie, E. I, & Mabbitt, K. A. (1956). Journal of Dairy Research 23, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, S. E. & Delbruck, M. (1943). Genetics 28, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meanwell, L. J. & Symons, J. M. (1953). 13th International Dairy Congress, The Hague 3, 1109.Google Scholar
Reiter, B. (1973). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 26, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, B. & Kirikova, M. V. (1971). Report, National Institute for Research in Dairying 1969–70, p. 151.Google Scholar
Robertson, P. S. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, T. D., Pearce, L. E. & Lawrence, R. C. (1974). 19th International Dairy Congress, New Delhi, 1E, 409.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H. R. & Cox, G. A. (1936). Journal of Dairy Research 7, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, K. R., Alberts, B. M., Benzinger, R., Lawhorne, L. & Treiber, G. (1970). Virology 40, 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar