Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:12:28.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variations in the total nitrogen, non-protein nitrogen and urea nitrogen contents of Friesian and Jersey milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. K. R. McDowell
A. K. R. McDowell
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A large number of samples (433) from the milk of Friesian herds was taken during the period November 1968 – September 1969, and a smaller number (159) from Jersey herds during the dairy ‘season’ September 1969 – April 1970, and analysed for total nitrogen (TN) and for non-protein nitrogen (NPN). The Friesian milk sample varied in TN from 0·456 to 0·624% (average 0·531 ± 0·021%) and in NPN from 0·024 to 0·054% (average 0·035 ± 0·004%). The Jersey samples varied in TN from 0·467 to 0·718% (average 0·584 ± 0·036%) and in NPN from 0·022 to 0·051% (average 0·033 ± 0·006%).The average NPN value for all the milks was 0·034 ± 0·005%.

There was a seasonal trend in NPN and TN for the Jersey and in TN but not in NPN for the Friesian milks. The proportion of NPN as a percentage of TN varied widely – for the Friesian samples from 4·9 to 10·2% (average 6·46%) and for the Jersey samples from 3·7 to 8·7% (average 5·74%).

Urea N also was estimated in 125 of the Friesian and in all the Jersey milk samples. It varied from 0·012 to 0·029% (average 0·020 ± 0·004%) in the Friesian and from 0·009 to 0·031% (average 0·020 ± 0·004%) in the Jersey samples. For all the milks the urea N as a percentage of NPN varied from 33 to 79 (average 56·5%).

It is suggested that values for ‘protein content’ of milk should refer only to ‘true’ protein ((TN – NPN) × 6·38) and that in the absence of an analytical result for NPN the use of an average value such as that above would be justified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, H. H. (1959). Analyt. Chem. 31, 1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, E. A. & Whittier, E. O. (1965). In Fundamentals of dairy chemistry, p. 30. (Eds Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H..) Westport, Conn.: Avi Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Flux, D. S., Patchell, M. R., Campbell, I. L. & McDowall, F. H. (1955). Publs N.Z. Dairy Res. Inst. no. 277.Google Scholar
Harland, H. A., Coulter, S. T. & Jenness, R. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Y., Ogura, Y. & Yonemura, T. (1966). Natn. Inst. Anim. Hlth Q., Tokyo 6, 233.Google Scholar
Nadai, Y. (1958). J. Biochem., Tokyo 45, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Dairy Board (1968–1969). 45th Farm Production Report, p. 41.Google Scholar
Nickerson, T. A. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinart, A. & Nesbitt, J. M. (1956). 14th Int. Dairy Congr., Rome 1(2), 925.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Campling, R. C. (1965). J. Dairy Res. 32, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Line, C. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr., Copenhagen A, 57.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, B. & Klobasa, F. (1969). Milchwissenschaft 24, 713.Google Scholar
Shahani, K. M. & Sommer, H. H. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarassuk, N. P., Abe, N. & Moats, W. A. (1967). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1369.Google Scholar
Watt, G. W. & Chrisp, J. D. (1954). Analyt. Chem. 26, 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar