Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:04:58.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rumen-protected methionine and lysine: effects on milk production and plasma amino acids of dairy cows with reference to metabolisable protein status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

Mofleh S Awawdeh
Mofleh S Awawdeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of rumen-protected Met (RPM) alone or with rumen-protected Lys (RPL) on milk yield and plasma amino acids of dairy cows. In experiment 1, 24 multiparous Holstein cows (154 DIM) were assigned to one of 3 groups where each cow received 0 g/d of RPM and RPL (C), 30 g/d of RPM (M), or 30 g/d of RPM plus 25 g of RPL (ML). The study lasted for 8 weeks where milk yield and composition were determined weekly. Daily milk yield averaged 28·0, 27·8, and 29·7 kg/cow for the C, M, and ML groups, respectively. Dietary treatments had no effects (P ≥ 0·54) on milk contents of fat, lactose, solid non-fat or total solids. Milk protein content in the ML group was greater (P < 0·05) than the C and M groups. Plasma levels of all AA were not significantly (P ≥ 0·09) affected by supplemental RPL and/or RPM. In experiment 2, 30 multiparous Holstein cows (100 DIM) were assigned to one of 3 groups where each cow received 0 g/d of RPM and RPL (C), 50 g/d of RPM (M), or 50 g/d of RPM plus 25 g/d of RPL (ML). The study lasted for 5 weeks. Cows in the M (30·5 kg) and ML (31·4 kg) groups produced (P < 0·05) more milk than those of the C group (29·1 kg). Under conditions of this study, RPM plus RPL improved milk yield and protein contents of dairy cows and was better than supplying RPM alone. Response in milk yield to RPM and RPL was affected by the MP status of cows which deserves further investigation.

Keywords

Dairy cowslysinemethioninemilkplasma amino acids
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 151 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armentano, LE, Bertics, SJ & Ducharme, GA 1997 Response of lactating cows to methionine or methionine plus lysine added to high protein diets based on alfalfa and heated soybeans. Journal of Dairy Science 80 1194–1199Google Scholar
Elwakeel, EA, Titgemeyer, EC, Faris, BR, Brake, DW, Nour, AM & Nasser, MEA 2012 Hydroxymethyl lysine is a source of bioavailable lysine for ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 90 3898–3904Google Scholar
Kim, C-H, Choung, J-J & Chamberlain, DG 2000 Variability in the ranking of the three most-limiting amino acids for milk protein production in dairy cows consuming grass silage and a cereal-based supplement containing feather meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80 1386–1392Google Scholar
Kim, C-H, Choung, J-J & Chamberlain, DG 2001 Estimates of the efficiency of transfer of L-histidine from blood to milk when it is the first-limiting amino acid for secretion of milk protein in the dairy cow. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81 1150–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C, Giallongo, F, Hristov, AN, Lapierre, H, Cassidy, TW, Heyler, KS, Varga, GA & Parys, C 2015 Effect of dietary protein level and rumen-protected amino acid supplementation on amino acid utilization for milk protein in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98 1885–1902Google Scholar
Mullins, CR, Weber, D, Block, E, Smith, JF, Brouk, MJ & Bradford, BJ 2013 Short communication: supplementing lysine and methionine in a lactation diet containing a high concentration of wet corn gluten feed did not alter milk protein yield. Journal of Dairy Science 96 5300–5305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, JR, Schingoethe, DJ, Maiga, HA, Brouk, MJ & Piepenbrink, MS 1998 Evaluation of corn distillers grains and ruminally protected lysine and methionine for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81 482–491Google Scholar
Noftsger, S, St-Pierre, NR & Sylvester, JT 2005 Determination of rumen degradability and ruminal effects of three sources of methionine in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 223–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (7th ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Piepenbrink, MS, Marr, AL, Waldron, MR, Butler, WR, Overton, TR, Vázquez-Añón, M & Holt, MD 2004 Feeding 2-Hydroxy-4-(Methylthio)-Butanoic acid to periparturient dairy cows improves milk production but not hepatic metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 87 1071–1084Google Scholar
Robinson, PH 2010 Impacts of manipulating ration metabolizable lysine and methionine levels on the performance of lactating dairy cows: a systematic review of the literature. Livestock Science 127 115–126Google Scholar
Robinson, PH, Fredeen, AH, Chalupa, W, Julien, WE, Sato, H, Fujieda, T & Suzuki, H 1995 Ruminally protected lysine and methionine for lactating dairy cows fed a diet designed to meet requirements for microbial and postruminal protein. Journal of Dairy Science 78 582–594Google Scholar
Robinson, PH, Chalupa, W, Sniffen, CJ, Julien, WE, Sato, H, Watanabe, K, Fujieda, T & Suzuki, H 1998 Ruminally protected lysine or lysine and methionine for lactating dairy cows fed a ration designed to meet requirements for microbial and postruminal protein. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1364–1373Google Scholar
Socha, MT, Putnam, DE, Garthwaite, BD, Whitehouse, NL, Kierstead, NA, Schwab, CG, Ducharme, GA & Robert, JC 2005 Improving intestinal amino acid supply of pre- and postpartum dairy cows with rumen-protected methionine and lysine. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1113–1126Google Scholar
Swanepoel, N, Robinson, PH & Erasmus, LJ 2010 Amino acid needs of lactating dairy cows: impact of feeding lysine in a ruminally protected form on productivity of lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 157 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trináctý, J, Krízová, L, Richter, M, Cerný, V & Ríha, J 2009 Effect of rumen-protected methionine, lysine or both on milk production and plasma amino acids of high-yielding dairy cows. Czech Journal of Animal Science 54 239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C, Liu, HY, Wang, YM, Yang, ZQ, Liu, JX, Wu, YM, Yan, T & Ye, HW 2010 Effects of dietary supplementation of methionine and lysine on milk production and nitrogen utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93 3661–3670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanton, GI, Bowman, GR, Vazquez-Anon, M & Rode, LM 2014 Meta-analysis of lactation performance in dairy cows receiving supplemental dietary methionine sources or postruminal infusion of methionine. Journal of Dairy Science 97 7085–7101Google Scholar