Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:43:36.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A quantitative evaluation of some factors affecting the non-fatty solids of cow's milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

W. H. Alexander
Affiliation:
The National Agricultural Advisory Service, Newcastle on Tyne
F. B. Leech
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden

Summary

Ten farms in the county of Durham took part in a field study of the effects of feeding and of udder disease on the level of non-fatty solids (s.n.f.) in milk. Statistical analysis of the resulting data showed that age, pregnancy, season of the year, and total cell count affected the percentage of s.n.f. and that these effects were additive and independent of each other. No effect associated with nutritional changes could be demonstrated.

The principal effects of the factors, each one freed from effects of other factors, were as follows:

Herds in which s.n.f. had been consistently low over a period of years were compared with herds in which s.n.f. had been satisfactory. Analysis of the data showed that about 70% of the difference in s.n.f. between these groups could be accounted for by differences in age of cow, stage of lactation, cell count and breed.

There was some evidence of a residual effect following clinical mastitis that could not be accounted for by residual high cell counts.

The within-cow regression of s.n.f. on log cell count calculated from the Durham data and from van Rensburg's data was on both occasions negative.

The implications of these findings are discussed, particularly in relation to advisory work.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L. (1952 a). Dairy Sci. Abstracts, 14, 893.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. L. (1952 b). J. Dairy Res. 19, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. (1934). J. Dairy Res. 5, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, C. M. & Malcolm, J. F. (1956). Vet. Rec. 68, 447.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1957). Chemical Composition and Quality of Milk, Advisory Leaflet, no. 29. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., Waite, R. & White, J. C. D. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rensburg, S. W. J. (1947). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 22, 91.Google Scholar
Waite, R. & Blackburn, P. S. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1952). Rations for Livestock, Bull. no. 48. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar