Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:20:25.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production of hydrogen peroxide by a small molecular mass compound in milk from Holstein cows with high and low milk somatic cell count

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2008

Senkiti Sakai ,
Eriko Nonobe ,
Takahiro Satow ,
Kazuhiko Imakawa  and
Kentaro Nagaoka
Senkiti Sakai*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, The Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Eriko Nonobe
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, The Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Takahiro Satow
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, The Graduate School of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Kameino 1866, Fujisawa 252-8510, Japan
Kazuhiko Imakawa
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, The Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Kentaro Nagaoka
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, The Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mastitis is the most frequent and prevalent production disease in dairy herds in developed countries. Based on a milk somatic cell count (SCC) of either >300 000 or <200 000 cells/ml in this study, we defined the quarter as either inflamed or uninflamed, respectively. The electrical conductivity (EC) of milk was used as an indicator of udder epithelial cell damage. We determined the amount of H2O2 produced by utilizing a small molecular weight compound in milk, and examined the characteristics of H2O2 production and EC in milk from inflamed and uninflamed quarters. In cows with milk of delivery grade (control population), H2O2 production and EC were 3·6±1·3 nmol/ml and 5·4±0·4 mS/cm (mean±sd), respectively. In 37 inflamed quarter milk samples, the production of H2O2 was 1·9±1·0 nmol/ml and was significantly smaller than that in the control population (P<0·01). Production of H2O2 was moderately but significantly correlated with EC (r<−0·71). In 20 cows with inflamed quarters, the production of H2O2 in milk from inflamed quarters was significantly smaller than that in milk from uninflamed quarters (P<0·01). In 18 out of 20 cows, milk from inflamed quarters showed the smallest H2O2 production among all tested quarters in each cow. We conclude that inflammation caused a decrease in H2O2 production in milk. In this study, we present parameters for evaluating the lactoperoxidase/H2O2/thiocyanate antibacterial defence system in bovine milk.

Keywords

Dairy cowhydrogen peroxideelectrical conductivitymilk somatic cell count
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 335 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bansal, BK, Hamann, J, Grabowski, NT & Singh, KB 2005 Variation in the composition of selected milk fraction samples from healthy and mastitic quarters, and its significance for mastitis diagnosis. Journal of Dairy Research 72 144–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barett, NE, Grabduson, AS & Lewis, MJ 1999 Contribution of the lactoperoxidase system to the keeping quality of pasteurized milk. Journal of Dairy Research 66 73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisharat, N, Crook, DW, Leigh, J, Harding, RM, Ward, PN, Coffey, TJ, Maiden, MC, Peto, T & Jones, PN 2004 Hyperinvasive neonatal group B streptococcus has arisen from a bovine ancestor. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42 2161–2167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björck, L, Rosen, CG, Marshall, V & Reiter, B 1975 Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system in milk against pseudomonads and other Gram-negative bacteria. Applied Microbiology 30 199–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ 2002 Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Veterinary Journal 164 116–128Google Scholar
Bramley, AJ & Dodd, FH 1984 Reviews on the progress of dairy science: mastitis control—progress and prospects. Journal of Dairy Research 51 481–512Google Scholar
De Oliveira, AP, Watts, JL, Salmon, SA & Aarestrup, FM 2000 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 83 855–862CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstrand, B 1989 Antimicrobial factors in milk—a review. Food Biotechnology 3 105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonteh, FA, Grandison, AS & Lewis, MJ 2002 Variations of lactoperoxidase activity and thiocyanate content in cows' and goats' milk throughout lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 69 401–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furtmüller, PG, Jantschko, W, Regesberger, G, Jakopitsch, C, Arnhold, J & Obinger, C 2002 Reaction of lactoperoxidase compound I with halides and thiocyanate. Biochemistry 41 11895–11900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillerton, JE & Walton, AW 1991 Identification for subclinical mastitis with a hand-held electrical conductivity meter. Veterinary Research 128 513–515Google ScholarPubMed
Hogarth, CJ, Fitzpatrick, JL, Nolan, AM, Young, FJ, Pitt, A & Eckersall, PD 2004 Differential protein composition of bovine whey: a comparison of whey from healthy animals and from those with clinical mastitis. Proteomics 4 2094–2100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, NE & Knudsen, K 1991 Interquarter comparison of markers of subclinical mastitis: somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase and antitrypsin. Journal of Dairy Research 58 389–399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ 1981 Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research 48 167–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ, Middleton, G, Durward, IG, Andrews, RJ & Salmon, MC 1980 Mastitis diagnositic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. Journal of Dairy Science 63 978–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, HJ & Reiter, B 1983 Production of H2O2 by bovine blood and milk polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Acta Microbiology Poland 32 53–64Google ScholarPubMed
Milner, P, Page, KL, Walton, AW & Hillerton, JE 1996 Detection of clinical mastitis by changes in electrical conductivity of foremilk before visible changes in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 79 83–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neave, FK, Dodd, FH & Kingwill, RG 1966 A method of controlling udder disease. Veterinary Record 78 521–523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielen, M, Deluyker, H, Schukken, YH & Brand, A 1992 Electrical conductivity of milk: measurements, modifiers, and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. Journal of Dairy Science 75 606–614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyörälä, S 2003 Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Research 34 565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainard, P & Riollet, C 2006 Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Veterinary Research 37 369–400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, B & Harnulv, BG 1984 Lactoperoxidase antibacterial system: natural occurrence, biological functions and practical applications. Journal of Food Protection 47 724–732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, S, Satow, T, Imakawa, K & Nagaoka, K 2008 Generation of hydrogen peroxide by a low molecular weight compound in whey of Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research (in press)Google ScholarPubMed
Seegers, H, Fourichon, C & Beaudeau, F 2003 Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 34 475–491CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoshani, E & Berman, A 1998 Subclinical assessed by deviations in milk yield and electrical resistance. Journal of Dairy Research 65 31–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloth, KHMN, Friggens, NC, Løvendahl, P, Andersen, PH, Jensen, J & Ingvatsen, KL 2003 Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 86 1221–1232Google Scholar
White, DG & McDermott, PF 2001 Emergence and transfer of antibiotic resistance. Journal of Dairy Science 84 E151–E155CrossRefGoogle Scholar