Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:43:39.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A pilot plant for the removal of cationic fission products from milk. III. Nutritional evaluation of the product

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. Braude ,
R. F. Glascock ,
M. J. Newport  and
J. W. G. Porter
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
R. F. Glascock
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
M. J. Newport
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. W. G. Porter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

As previously described, the process consists essentially of the passage of milk at pH 5·2–5·3 through an ion exchange resin charged with a suitable mixture of the ions of Ca, K, Na and Mg.

The nutritive quality of plant-treated milk was assessed in feeding experiments with weanling rats and 1- to 2-day-old piglets.

No deleterious effect was found with rats, but tests with piglets indicated that the nutritive quality of the milk was impaired as evidenced by a higher mortality.

Post mortem examinations revealed no specific cause of death.

The use of hydrochloric acid instead of citric acid resulted in a lower mortality, though not as low as that found in piglets receiving untreated milk.

The difference in mortality between animals receiving treated and untreated milk was not consistent and was not found in some experiments.

It is concluded that the milk is unsuitable for piglets and that its suitability for human infants remains in question.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 129 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Suffolk, S. F. (1968). J. Inst. Anim. Techns.Google Scholar
Glascock, R. F. & Bkyant, D. T. W. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 269.Google Scholar
Glascock, R. F., Hall, H. S., Suffolk, S. F. & Bryant, D. T. W. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallgren, W. (1940). Svensk VetTidskr. 45, 382.Google Scholar
Isaacs, R. E., Hazzakd, D. G., Barth, J., Walker, J. P., Fooks, J. H. & Edmondson, L. F. (1967). J. agric. Fd Chem. 15, 301.Google Scholar
Weikl, A. & Emig, G. (1957). Tierärztl. Umsch. 12, 355.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & Mccance, R. A. (1956). Clin. Sci. 15, 361.Google Scholar