Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-r56mn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T19:54:53.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pasture access and social housing influence the behaviour of dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

Teresa Cristina Alves
Affiliation:
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
Karolini Tenffen De-Sousa
Affiliation:
Grupo de Estudos em Bovinos Leiteiros, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Pamela Caroline Gomes
Affiliation:
Centro Universitário Central Paulista, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
Vitória Tobias Paris
Affiliation:
Centro Universitário Central Paulista, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
Matheus Deniz*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Estudos em Bovinos Leiteiros, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Matheus Deniz; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This Research Communication set out to (1) evaluate the behaviour and performance of dairy calves raised on pasture individually or in groups, and (2) evaluate the influence of physical enrichment on the behaviour and performance of dairy calves raised in groups on pasture. Although there was no difference in grazing behaviour when housed in groups, calves spent longer eating concentrate, ruminating and drinking water. Additionaly, calves housed individually spend part of their time trying to get close to a neighbouring calf. When available, the brush was the physical enrichment item most used by calves followed by straw-man and ball. Pasture access may allow calves to exhibit their highly motivated natural behaviours such as grazing and rumination. Furthermore, social housing provides dairy calves an opportunity for social bonding. Thus, social housing with free access to pasture areas could be an alternative in tropical regions to the typical individual rearing system used in intensive dairy farming.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bryant, MP and Small, N (1960) Observations on the ruminal microorganisms of isolated and inoculated calves. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 654667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bučková, K, Špinka, M and Hintze, S (2019) Pair housing makes calves more optimistic. Scientific Reports 9, 20246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor, MC, Neave, HW and Costa, JH (2019) Current perspectives on the short- and long-term effects of conventional dairy calf raising systems: a comparison with the natural environment. Translational Animal Science 3, 549563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coria-Avila, GA, Pfaus, JG, Orihuela, A, Domínguez-Oliva, A, José-Pérez, N, Hernández, LA and Mota-Rojas, D (2022) The neurobiology of behavior and its applicability for animal welfare: a review. Animals 12, 928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, JHC, Von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2016) Invited review: effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 24532467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deniz, M, Sousa, KTD, Gomes, IC, Martinez, M and Dittrich, JR (2021) Classification of environmental factors potentially motivating for dairy cows to access shade. Journal of Dairy Research 88, 274277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, KC, Allen, AN and Miller-Cushon, EK (2020) Effects of access to stationary brushes and chopped hay on behavior and performance of individually housed dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 84218432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, MB (2003) The effects of feeding method, milk allowance and social factors on milk feeding behaviour and cross-sucking in group housed dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, MB and Vestergaard, M (2021) Invited review: freedom from thirst – do dairy cows and calves have sufficient access to drinking water? Journal of Dairy Science 104, 1136811385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kertz, AF, Reutzel, LF and Mahoney, JH (1984) Ad libitum water intake by neonatal calves and its relationship to calf starter intake, weight gain, feces score, and season. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 29642969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Cushon, EK and DeVries, TJ (2016) Effect of social housing on the development of feeding behavior and social feeding preferences of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 14061417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moncada, AC, Neave, HW, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2020) Use of a mechanical brush by dairy cows with chorioptic mange. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 223, 104925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, RC (1995) Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44, 229243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogues, E, Ede, T, Woodroffe, RE, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2023) Can a social partner alleviate conditioned place aversion caused by isolation and pain in dairy calves? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 269, 106092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, M, Enjalbert, F and Monteils, V (2012) Establishment of ruminal enzyme activities and fermentation capacity in dairy calves from birth through weaning. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 15001512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojas-Ferrer, I, Thompson, MJ and Morand-Ferron, J (2020) Is exploration a metric for information gathering? Attraction to novelty and plasticity in black-capped chickadees. Ethology 126, 383392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuppli, CA, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2014) Access to pasture for dairy cows: responses from an online engagement. Journal of Animal Science 92, 51855193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirovica, LV, Ritter, C, Hendricks, J, Weary, DM, Gulati, S and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2022) Public attitude toward and perceptions of dairy cattle welfare in cow-calf management systems differing in type of social and maternal contact. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 32483268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strappini, AC, Monti, G, Sepúlveda-Varas, P, Freslon, I and Peralta, JM (2021) Measuring calves' usage of multiple environmental enrichment objects provided simultaneously. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8, 698681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tedeschi, LO and Fox, DG (2009) Predicting milk and forage intake of nursing calves. Journal of Animal Science 87, 33803391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2007) Maternal behavior in cattle. Hormones and Behavior 52, 106113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood-Gush, DGM and Vestergaard, K (1989) Exploratory behavior and the welfare of intensively kept animals. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2, 161169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C, Juniper, DT, McDonald, R, Parsons, S and Meagher, RK (2022) Holstein calves’ preference for potential physical enrichment items on different presentation schedules. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 83168327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Alves et al. supplementary material

Alves et al. supplementary material
Download Alves et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB