Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:36:08.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new method for the preparation of an immunologically homogeneous β-casein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Garnier ,
B. Ribadeau-Dumas  and
G. Mocquot
J. Garnier
Affiliation:
Station Centrale de Microbiologie et Recherches LaitièresI.N.R.A., Jouy-en-Josas (S. & 0.) France
B. Ribadeau-Dumas
Affiliation:
Station Centrale de Microbiologie et Recherches LaitièresI.N.R.A., Jouy-en-Josas (S. & 0.) France
G. Mocquot
Affiliation:
Station Centrale de Microbiologie et Recherches LaitièresI.N.R.A., Jouy-en-Josas (S. & 0.) France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The preparation of an immunologically homogeneous β-casein is described, involving several separations by chromatography on diethylaminoethyl cellulose with urea-imidazole buffer at pH 7, followed by Tris buffer at pH 8·2. 30% of the β-casein present in the skim-milk is obtained by this method. β-casein gives a single band in urea-starch gel electrophoresis when it is obtained from the milk of cows homozygous for this character.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aschaffenburg, R. (1961). Nature, Lond., 192, 431.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamann, E., Novotny, E. & Rohr, L. (1948). Chem. Ber. 81, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, J., Ribadeau-Dumas, B., & Gautreau, J. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr. B, 655.Google Scholar
Gough, P. & Jenness, R. (1962). J. Immunol. 89, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabar, P. & Williams, C. A. (1955). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 17, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, M. L., McMeekin, T. L., Hipp, N. J. & Gordon, W. G. (1962). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 57, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, N. J., Groves, M. L., Custer, J. H. & McMeekin, T. L. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminsky, M. (1954). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 13, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, C. L. (1960). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem., Wash. 43, 689.Google Scholar
Payens, T. A. J. & van Markwijk, B. W. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 71, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 54, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau-Dumas, B. & Alais, C. (1961). Bull. Soc. Chim. biol., Paris, 43, 377.Google Scholar
Ribadeau-Dumas, B., Maubois, J. L., Mocquot, G. & Garnier, J. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta (in the Press).Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. & Payens, T. A. J. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 78, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. A., Fitzpatrick, M. M., Stanton, E. K., Amino, R., Kissel, G. & Palermiti, F. (1955). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 55, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, R. G. & Baldwin, R. E. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 47, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. C. (1944). J. Amer. chem. Soc. 66, 1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, L. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar