Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:50:41.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molassed sugar-beet pulp nuts supplemented with urea and phosphate used as a milk production concentrate for dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. J. Parkins ,
R. G. Hemingway  and
N. S. Ritchie
J. J. Parkins
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
N. S. Ritchie
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A cubed molassed sugar-beet product with added urea, dicalcium phosphate, trace elements and vitamins was prepared containing 17% crude protein and up to 0·53% P. The product was evaluated in 3 changeover trials with lactating cows and the treatments involved comparisons with a low protein (10%) concentrate and one supplemented with groundnut plus cottonseed meals. When the product was included at 35–62% in milk production diets the mean daily yield of about 15 kg was about 0·5kg less than when full supplementation was as vegetable protein. This was considered more likely to be associated with inefficient utilization of urea rather than because of an energy difference between molassed sugar-beet pulp and barley.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , October 1974 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1972). Joint Conference on Nutrient Standards for Ruminants.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1965).The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants.London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Trinder, N. (1966).Journal of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne Agricultural Society 20, 21.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1960 a).British Sugar Beet Review 29, 21.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1960 b).British Sugar Beet Review 29, 71.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Balch, C. C., Bartlett, S. & Campling, R. C. (1960).Journal of Agricultural Science 55, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. (1972).Journal of Agricultural Science 78, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E., Drysdale, A. D. & Watson, J. N. (1966).Journal of Dairy Research 33, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomyszyn, M., Bieliński, K. & Słaboń, W. (1962).Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych B 79, 17.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941).Journal of Dairy Science 24, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, P., Nitsche, H. & Müller, J. (1938).Zeitschrift für Tierernährung und Füttermittelkunde 1, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1928).Bulletin of the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station No. 308.Google Scholar
Kaemerrer, K. & Bollmann, V. (1968).Zentralblatt für Veteriädrmedizin 15A, 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaemerrer, K. & Budden, R. (1968).Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin 15A, 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1943).Journal of Dairy Science 26, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehring, K. (1937).Forschungsdienst 4, 342.Google Scholar
Nehring, K. (1939).Forschungsdienst 7, 86.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J. (1972). Thesis. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Repp, W. W., Hale, W. H., Cheng, E. W. & Burroughs, W. (1955).Journal of Animal Science 14, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronning, M. & Bath, D. L. (1962).Journal of Dairy Science 45, 854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J., Kliesch, J. & Kämpffer, A. (1937).Forschungsdienst 4, 439.Google Scholar
Wettereau, H. & Holzschuh, W. (1958/1959).Jahrbuch der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Fütterungsberatung 2, 20 and 48.Google Scholar
Wettereau, H., Schlegel, H. & Holzschuh, W. (1961/1962).Jahrbuch der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Fütterungsberatung 4, 35.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H., Nijkamp, H. J. & Vogt, J. E. (1971).Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 19, 48.Google Scholar