Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:30:32.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk cathelicidin and somatic cell counts in dairy goats along the course of lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2019

Vittorio Tedde ,
Valerio Bronzo ,
Giulia Maria Grazia Puggioni ,
Claudia Pollera ,
Antonio Casula ,
Giulio Curone ,
Paolo Moroni ,
Sergio Uzzau  and
Maria Filippa Addis
Vittorio Tedde
Affiliation:
Porto Conte Ricerche, Alghero, Italy
Valerio Bronzo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Giulia Maria Grazia Puggioni
Affiliation:
Porto Conte Ricerche, Alghero, Italy
Claudia Pollera
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Antonio Casula
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Giulio Curone
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Paolo Moroni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy Cornell University, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, Ithaca, NY, USA
Sergio Uzzau
Affiliation:
Porto Conte Ricerche, Alghero, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Maria Filippa Addis*
Affiliation:
Porto Conte Ricerche, Alghero, Italy Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Maria Filippa Addis, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research communication reports the evaluation of cathelicidin in dairy goat milk for its relationship with the somatic cell count (SCC) and microbial culture results. Considering the limited performances of SCC for mastitis monitoring in goats, there is interest in evaluating alternative diagnostic tools. Cathelicidin is an antimicrobial protein involved in innate immunity of the mammary gland. In this work, half-udder milk was sampled bimonthly from a herd of 37 Alpine goats along an entire lactation and tested with the cathelicidin ELISA together with SCC and bacterial culture. Cathelicidin and SCC showed a strong correlation (r = 0.72; n = 360 milk samples). This was highest in mid-lactation (r = 0.83) and lowest in late lactation (r = 0.61), and was higher in primiparous (0.80, n = 130) than in multiparous goats (0.71, n = 230). Both markers increased with stage of lactation, but cathelicidin increased significantly less than SCC. In addition, peak level in late lactation was lower for cathelicidin (5.05-fold increase) than for SCC (7.64-fold increase). Twenty-one (5.8%) samples were positive to bacteriological culture, 20 for coagulase-negative staphylococci and one for Streptococcus spp.; 18 of them were positive to the cathelicidin ELISA (85.71% sensitivity). Sensitivity of SCC >500 000 and of SCC >1 000 000 cells/ml was lower (71.43 and 23.81%, respectively). Therefore, the high correlation of cathelicidin with SCC during the entire lactation, along with its lower increase in late lactation and good sensitivity in detecting intramammary infection (IMI), indicate a potential for monitoring subclinical mastitis in dairy goats. However, based on this preliminary assessment, specificity should be improved (40.41% for cathelicidin vs. 54.57 and 67.85% for SCC >500 000 and >1 000 000 cells/ml, respectively). Therefore, the application of cathelicidin for detecting goat IMI will require further investigation and optimization, especially concerning the definition of diagnostic thresholds.

Keywords

Cathelicidindairy goatsELISAsomatic cell countssubclinical mastitis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 217 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, MF, Tedde, V, Dore, S, Pisau, G, Puggioni, GMG, Roggio, AM, Pagnozzi, D, Lollai, S, Cannas, EA and Uzzau, S (2016 a) Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of dairy sheep mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 6446–6456.Google Scholar
Addis, MF, Tedde, V, Puggioni, GMG, Pisanu, S, Casula, A, Locatelli, C, Rota, N, Bronzo, V, Moroni, P and Uzzau, S (2016 b) Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 8250–8258.Google Scholar
Addis, MF, Bronzo, V, Puggioni, GMG, Cacciotto, C, Tedde, V, Pagnozzi, D, Locatelli, C, Calusa, A, Curone, G, Uzzau, S and Moroni, P (2017) Relationship between milk cathelicidin abundance and microbiologic culture in clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 2944–2953.Google Scholar
Bagnicka, E, Winnicka, A, Józwik, A, Rzewuska, M, Strzałkowska, N, Kosciuczuk, W, Prusak, B, Kaba, J, Horbanczuk, J and Krzyzewski, J (2011) Relationship between somatic cell count and bacterial pathogens in goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 100, 72–77.Google Scholar
Borregaard, N, Sørensen, OE and Theilgaard-Mönch, K (2007) Neutrophil granules: a library of innate immunity proteins. Trends in Immunology 28, 340–345.Google Scholar
Cubeddu, T, Cacciotto, C, Pisanu, S, Tedde, V, Alberti, A, Pittau, M, Dore, S, Cannas, EA, Uzzau, S, Rocca, S and Addis, MF (2017) Cathelicidin production and release by mammary epithelial cells during infectious mastitis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 189, 66–70.Google Scholar
Flatland, B, Friedrichs, KR and Klenner, S (2014) Differentiating between analytical and diagnostic performance evaluation with a focus on the method comparison study and identification of bias. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 43, 475–486.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, JL, Lyman, RL, Hockett, M, Rodriguez, R, Dos Santos, MV and Anderson, K (2017) Using milk leukocyte differentials for diagnosis of subclinical bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research 84, 309–317.Google Scholar
Haenlein, GF (2002) Relationship of somatic cell counts in goat milk to mastitis and productivity. Small Ruminant Research 45, 163–178.Google Scholar
Kirk, JH (1984) Programmable calculator program for linear somatic cell scores to estimate mastitis yield losses. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 441–443.Google Scholar
National Mastitis Council (2017) Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. National Mastitis Council, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Paape, MJ, Wiggans, GR, Bannerman, DD, Thomas, DL, Sanders, AH, Contreras, P, Moroni, P and Miller, RH (2007) Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Ruminant Research 68, 114–125.Google Scholar
Pisanu, S, Cubeddu, T, Pagnozzi, D, Rocca, S, Cacciotto, A, Alberti, A, Marogan, G, Uzzau, S and Addis, MF (2015) Neutrophil extracellular traps in sheep mastitis. Veterinary Research 46, 59.Google Scholar
Souza, FN, Blagitz, MG, Penna, CFAM, Della Libera, AMMP, Heinemann, MB and Cerqueira, MMOP (2012) Somatic cell count in small ruminants: friend or foe? Small Ruminant Research 107, 65–75.Google Scholar
Stuhr, T and Aulrich, K (2010) Intramammary infections in dairy goats: recent knowledge and indicators for detection of subclinical mastitis. Landbauforschung Volkenrode 60, 267–280.Google Scholar
Viguier, C, Arora, S, Gilmartin, N, Welbeck, K and O'Kennedy, R (2009) Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology 27, 486–493.Google Scholar
Zanetti, M (2005) The role of cathelicidins in the innate host defenses of mammals. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 7, 179–196.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Tedde et al. supplementary material

Tedde et al. supplementary material 1

Download Tedde et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 389.6 KB