Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:29:07.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lactostrepcins - acid bacteriocins produced by lactic streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Witold Kozak
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland
Jacek Bardowski
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland
Władysław T. Dobrzański
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland

Summary

All 47 non-nisin producing strains of Streptococcus lactis and 12/13 strains of Str. lactis subsp. diacetylactis examined produced bacteriocins, for which the term lactostrepcins is suggested. Seven strains of Str. cremoris examined produced no bacteriocins active against 3 lactic streptococci strains used as indicators. The strains examined were divided into 3 groups: I, those producing lactostrepcins active against only one streptomycin resistant mutant of Str. lactis 60 indicator strain; II, those producing lactostrepcins active against all 3 indicator strains; III, those not producing lactostrepcins active against the indicator strains employed. The lactostrepcins were sensitive to various proteolytic enzymes and to phospholipase D, but retained full or partial activity after dialysis. Most of the bacteriocins studied were fully active only within the pH range 4·2–5·0 and were reversibly inactivated at pH 7·0 or 8·0. Results suggested occurrence of 4 different lactostrepcins. The lactostrepcins produced by all group I strains were the same, but there were differences among the lactostrepcins produced by group II strains. Lactostrepcins killed some β-haemolytic streptococci and some strains of Lactobacillus helveticus. One of the lactostrepcins was also active against certain Leuconostoc strains, but not against other Leuconostoc strains, nor against L. helveticus or other Gram-positive bacteria.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradley, D. E. (1967). Bacteriological Reviews 31, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branen, A. L., Go, H. C. & Genske, R. P. (1975). Journal of Food Science 40, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efstathiou, J. D. & McKay, L. L. (1976). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 32, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, G. G., Jarvis, B. & Tramer, J. (1975). Technical Series, Society for Applied Bacteriology 8, 91.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. G., Zajdel, J. & Dobrzanski, W. T. (1975). Journal of General Microbiology 88, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, E. & Morell, J. L. (1971). Journal of the American Chemical Society 93, 4634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, K. G. (1975). Bacteriological Reviews 39, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A. (1966). Journal of General Microbiology 44, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A. (1972). Journal of Milk and Food Technology 35, 418.Google Scholar
Jarvis, B. & Mahoney, R. R. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozak, W., Bardowski, J. & Dobrzanski, W. T. (1977). Bulletin de l’ Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des Sciences Biologiques 25, 217.Google Scholar
Kozak, W., Rajchert-Trzpil, M. & Dobrzanski, W. T. (1974). Journal of General Microbiology 83, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozak, W., Rajchert-Trzpil, M., Zajdel, J. & Dobrzanski, W. T. (1973). Applied Microbiology 25, 305.Google Scholar
Oxford, A. E. (1944). Biochemical Journal 38, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, P. (1972). Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Biophysics 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, J. R., Dajani, A. S. & Wannamaker, L. W. (1976). Bacteriological Reviews 40, 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiemann, U. & Belitz, H. D. (1969). Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung 141, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar