Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:55:31.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactic casein whey powder in rations for pigs: I. The substitution of un-neutralized lactic casein whey powder for barley meal in an all-meal ration for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. C. Dunkin
A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
Massey College, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of 2 experiments indicated that casein whey powder can successfully constitute a relatively high proportion of an all-meal diet for growing pigs. Pigs given a diet consisting of a basal meal allowance per day of ½ lb meat meal and 1½ lb barley meal plus increasing amounts of casein whey powder took significantly less time and required significantly less food to grow from 50 lb to 120—140 lb liveweight, than either the control pigs or those given diets containing smaller basal meal allowances but correspondingly more whey powder. In the best diet whey powder comprised approximately 40% of the total food consumed. In one experiment, diets containing more whey powder than this resulted in slower growth rates, relative to that of the controls, from 110 lb liveweight onwards.

There was a little more scouring on the diets containing the greater amounts of whey powder; but even where whey powder formed approximately 83% of the total food consumed, the incidence of scouring was not of great practical importance. Moreover, there was considerable variation among animals within treatment groups in this respect.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , October 1963 , pp. 323 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, D. E., Terrill, S. W., Jensen, A. H. & Hanson, L. J. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bünger, H. (1940). Forschungsdienst, 9, 288. (Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 10, 428.)Google Scholar
Dunkin, A. C. (1958). N.Z. J. agric. Res. 1, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkin, A. C. (1959). N.Z. J. agric. Res. 2, 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkin, A. C. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 231.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. E. & Sutton, T. S. (1949). J. Dairy Sci. 32, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krider, J. L., Becker, D. E., Curtin, L. V. & Van Poucke, R. F. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C. M. (1961). Thesis, Massey College, University of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., Kliesch, J. & Schmalenbach, H. (1939). Z. Schweinsucht. 46, 2. (Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 9, 231.)Google Scholar
Spellacy, J. R. (1953). Casein Dried and Condensed Whey. San Francisco: Lithotype Process Co.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1960). ‘Rations for Livestock’. Bull. Min. Agric. Fish. Fd. no. 48. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar