Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:18:20.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keeping quality and raw-milk grading: I. Dye tests as measures of the keeping quality of milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. T. R. Mattick ,
A. Rowlands ,
H. Barkworth ,
Zena Hosking  and
O. Kempthorne
A. T. R. Mattick
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
A. Rowlands
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
H. Barkworth
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service
Zena Hosking
Affiliation:
National Milk Testing Service
O. Kempthorne
Affiliation:
Statistical Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The experiments analysed in this series of papers were undertaken as the result of a discussion on methods of measuring the keeping quality of milk, at a Conference of Advisory Bacteriologists of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.

Owing to the disturbance and difficulty following the outbreak of war and the dislocation of handling and distribution, a serious decline in the keeping quality of raw-milk supplies was threatened.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1950 , pp. 159 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Mattick, A. T. R., Hiscox, E. R. & McClemont, J. (1935). Conf. Advisory Bacteriologists, paper no. 66. Min. Agric. Fish., London.Google Scholar
(2)Barkworth, H., Irwin, J. O. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1941). J. Dairy Res. 12, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Ministry of Agriculture And Fisheries, London (1943). Form no. C 158/TPY.Google Scholar
(4) Ministry of Health, London (1937). Memo 139/Foods.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, London (1934). BvM. Minist. Agric, no. 46.Google Scholar
(6)Anderson, E. B. & Wilson, G. S. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Thomas, S. B., Thomas, B. F. & Davies, J. (1939). Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 31.Google Scholar
(8)Robertson, A. H. & Frayer, J. M. (1930). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. no. 314.Google Scholar
(9)Johns, C. K. (1930). Sci. Agric. 11, 171.Google Scholar
(10)Wilson, G. S. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Conn., Lond., no. 206.Google Scholar
(11)Thomas, S. B., Bowie, D. A., Peregrine, A. & Phillips, G. M. (1944). Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 28.Google Scholar
(12)Hiscox, E. R., Hoy, W. A., Lomax, K. L. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1932). J. Dairy Res. 4, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Hobbs, B. C. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Rowlands, A. & Garvie, E. I. (1949). Personal communication.Google Scholar
(15)Johns, C. K. & Howson, R. K. (1940). J. Milk Tech. 3, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) American Public Health Association (1941). Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 8th ed.New York: Amer. Publ. Hlth Ass.Google Scholar
(17)Thomas, S. B. (1941). Dairy Industr. 6, 41, 102.Google Scholar
(18)Thomas, S. B. (1941). Proc. Soc. agric. Bad. p. 34.Google Scholar
(19)Thomas, S. B. & Probekt, D. (1941). Dairy Industr. 6, 269, 295.Google Scholar
(20)Thomas, S. B., Probert, D. & Morgan, K. (1941). Dairy Industr. 6, 323.Google Scholar
(21)Thomas, S. B. & Bowie, D. A. (1943). Proc. Soc. agric. Bad. p. 56.Google Scholar
(22)Thomas, S. B. & Bowie, D. A. (1944). Dairy Industr. 9, 335.Google Scholar
(23)Davis, J. G., Newland, L. G. & Knuokey, P. B. (1943). Dairy Industr. 8, 115.Google Scholar
(24)Morgan, G. V. & McKenzie, D. A. (1943). Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 64.Google Scholar
(25)Morris, C. S. & Edwards, M. (1944). Dairy Industr. 9, 92.Google Scholar
(26)Watts, P. S., McLeod, D. H. & Wheater, D. W. F. (1948). Dairy Industr. 13, 31.Google Scholar
(27)Thornton, H. R., McClure, F. & Sandin, R. B. (1941). Canad. J. Res. 19, B, (2), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(28)Johns, C. K. & Howson, R. K. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(29)Frayer, J. M. (1942). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta., no. 498.Google Scholar
(30)Twigg, R. S. (1945). Nature, Lond., 155, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1)Barkworth, H.Irwin, J. O. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1941). J. Dairy Res. 12, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Wilson, G. S. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 206.Google Scholar
(3)Phillips, G. M., Ashton, W. M., Simons, G. D. & Thomas, S. B. (1939). Welsh J. Agric. 15, 172.Google Scholar
(1)Dahlberg, A. O. & Garner, H. S. (1921). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 944.Google Scholar
(2)Hughes, A. E. & Ellison, D. (1949). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 2, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Jones-Evans, E. (1949). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 2, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Aybrs, S. H. & Johnson, W. T. (1915). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 202.Google Scholar
(5)Mltamura, K. (1937). J. Fac. Agric, Sapporo, 41, 97.Google Scholar
(6)Benton, A. G. & Albekry, H. G. (1926). J. biol. Chem. 68, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Seekles, L. & Smeets, W. T. G. M. (1947). Neth. Milk Dairy J. 1, 7.Google Scholar
(8)Sommer, H. H. & Binney, T. H. (1923). J. Dairy Sci. 6, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Weimar, A. C. (1923). J. Dairy Sci. 6, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar