Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:42:00.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of different storage conditions on the performance of spray-dried yogurt used as inoculum for milk fermentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Caterina Bater
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agrarias, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Av. A.M. de Justo 1600, CABA, Argentina
Mauricio Santos
Affiliation:
Clinical Bacteriology Service, Department of Bacteriology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases (ANLIS-INEI), CABA, Argentina
Mara V. Galmarini*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agrarias, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Av. A.M. de Justo 1600, CABA, Argentina Member of CONICET, CABA, Argentina
Andrea Gómez-Zavaglia
Affiliation:
Member of CONICET, CABA, Argentina Center for Research and Development in Food Cryotechnology (CIDCA) CCT-CONICET, La Plata, 1900, Argentina
Jorge Chirife
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agrarias, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Av. A.M. de Justo 1600, CABA, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: Mara V. Galmarini, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

A commercial drinkable yogurt with and without 4% of added trehalose (as cell protectant) was spray-dried obtaining a powder with low water activity (aw). Total bacterial count in the powder was between 8.48–8.90 log cfu/g. The dried yogurt was stored: (i) at 38 °C and aw = 0.33; (ii) at 38 °C in hermetically sealed flasks (aw = 0.21/0.22); (iii) in a cyclic temperature chamber (10–20 °C) in hermetically sealed flasks (aw = 0.21/0.22). Whole milk was then fermented by adding an inoculum of spray-dried yogurt after storage under these different conditions. The kinetics of acidification showed the presence of a lag time which was strongly dependent on storage conditions. The data was fitted with a logistic type equation from which the lag time was calculated. To evaluate structural differences among samples, Fourier Transform Infrared spectra (FTIR) were recorded. Partial Least Squares (PLS) models enabled a good correlation between lag time of fermentation and FTIR spectra. The lag time for yogurt powder stored at aw about 0.21/0.22 and cyclic temperature 10–20 °C remained approximately constant over the 12 weeks of storage, while all the other conditions resulted in a dramatic increase. The addition of trehalose had a small influence on lag time and, therefore, as a protectant of lactobacilli.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aureli, P, Fiore, A, Scalfaro, C, Casale, M and Franciosa, G (2010) National survey outcomes on commercial probiotic food supplements in Italy. International Journal of Food Microbiology 137, 265273.Google Scholar
Aquilina, G, Bach, A, Bampidis, V, Bastos, ML, Flachowsky, G, Gralak, MA, Hogstrand, C, Leng, L, López-Puente, S, Martelli, G, Mayo, B, Renshaw, D, Riychen, G, Saarela, M, Sejrsen, K, van Beelen, P, Wallace, RJ and Westendorf, J (2013) Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probiotic LACTINA® (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus lactis, Streptococcus thermopiles and Enterococcus faecium) for chickens for fattening and piglets. EFSA Journal 11, 3173183.Google Scholar
Barbosa, J, Brandao, TRS and Teixeira, P (2017) Spray drying conditions for orange juice incorporated with lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 52, 19511958.Google Scholar
Bielecka, M and Majkowska, A (2000) Effect of spray-drying temperature of yogurt on the survival of starter cultures, moisture content and sensoric properties of yogurt powder. Nahrung 44, 257260.Google Scholar
de Man, JO, Rogosa, M and Sharpe, ME (1960) A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23, 130135.Google Scholar
Esbensen, KH (2005) Multivariate Data Analysis. In practice 5th Edn. Esbjerg, Denmark: CAMO process AS.Google Scholar
Golowczyc, MA, Silva, J, Abraham, AG, De Antoni, GL and Teixeira, P (2010) Preservation of probiotic strains isolated from kefir by spray-drying. Letters in Applied Microbiology 50, 712.Google Scholar
Guergoletto, KB, Sivieri, K, Tsuruda, AY, Martins, EP, Bertuol de Souza, JC, Roig, SM, Hirooka, EY and Garcia, S (2012) Dried probiotics for use in functional food applications. In Benjamin, V (ed.), Food Industrial Processes- Methods and Equipment. London, UK: In Tech., pp. 227250. ISBN: 978-953-307-905-9. Available at http://www.intechopen.com/books/food-industrialprocesses-methods-and-equipment/dried-probiotics-for-use-in-functional-food-applicationsconditionsGoogle Scholar
Huang, (2011) Modeling of particle formation during spray drying. European Drying Conference – EuroDrying 2011. Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.Google Scholar
Kher, A, Udabage, P, Mc Kinnon, I, Mc Naughton, D and Agustin, MA (2007) FTIR investigation of spray-dried milk protein concentrate powders. Vibrational Spectroscopy 44, 375381.Google Scholar
Koç, B, Yilmazer, MS, Balkır, P and Ertekin, FK (2010) Moisture sorption isotherms and storage stability of spray-dried yogurt powder. Drying Technology 28, 816822.Google Scholar
Kumar, P and Mishra, HN (2004) Yoghurt powder — a review of process technology, storage and utilization. Food and Bioproducts Processing 82, 133142.Google Scholar
Labuza, TP and Saltmarch, M (1982) Kinetics of browning and protein quality loss in whey powders during steady state and nonsteady state storage conditions. Journal of Food Science 47, 9296.Google Scholar
Meng, XC, Stanton, GF, Fitzgerald, CD and Roos, RP (2007) Anhydrobiotics. Food Chemistry 106, 14061416.Google Scholar
Reale, A, di Renzo, T, Preziuso, M, Panfili, G, Cipriano, L, Messia, MC 2019 Stabilization of sourdough starter by spray drying technique: new breadmaking perspective. LWT – Food Science and Technology 99, 468475.Google Scholar
Romano, N, Schebor, C, Mobili, P and Gómez-Zavaglia, A (2016) Role of mono and oligosaccharides from FOS as stabilizing agents during freeze drying and storage of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subs. bulgaricus. Food Research International 90, 251258.Google Scholar
Santos, M, Araujo-Andrade, C, Tymczyszyn, E and Gomez-Zavaglia, A (2014 a) Determination of amorphous/rubbery states in freeze-dried prebiotic sugars using a combined approach of near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Food Research International 64, 514519.Google Scholar
Santos, MI, Araujo-Andrade, C, Esparza-Ibarra, E, Tymczyszyn, E and Gómez-Zavaglia, A (2014 b) Galacto-oligosaccharides and lactulose as protectants against desiccation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulcaricus. Biotechnology Progress 30, 12311238.Google Scholar
Schoug, A (2009) A Dry Phase of Life Freeze Drying and Storage Stability of Lactobacillus coryniformis Si3 in Sucrose-Based Formulations (Doctoral thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Succi, M, Sorrentino, E, di Renzo, T, Tremonte, P, Reale, A, Tipaldi, L, Pannella, G, Russo, A and Coppola, R (2014) Lactic acid bacteria in pharmaceutical formulations: presence and viability of ‘healthy microorganisms’. Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences 4, 6675.Google Scholar
Stefanello, RF, Machado, A, Cavalheiroa, C, Santos, M, Nabeshima, E, Copetti, M and Fries, L (2018) Trehalose as a cryoprotectant in freeze-dried wheat sourdough production. LWT – Food Science and Technology 89, 510517.Google Scholar
Wolkers, WF and Oldenhof, H (2005) In situ FTIR assessment of dried Lactobacillus bulgaricus: KBr disk formation affects physical properties. Spectroscopy 19, 8899.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, Lin, J and Zhong, Q (2016) Effects of media, heat adaptation and outlet temperature on the survival of Lactobacillus salivarius NRRL B-30514 after spray drying and subsequent storage. LWT-Food Science and Technology 74, 441447.Google Scholar