Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:32:20.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of cream-processing methods on the rate of setting and final hardness of sweet cream butter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

F. W. Wood
Affiliation:
The Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand
R. M. Dolby
Affiliation:
The Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

Cream-cooling rates, cream-pre-cooling treatments (Alnarp) and seasonal changes in the chemical composition of butterfat were found to influence the setting rate of butter. Vacreator pasteurization, however, especially at high steam intensity, had the greatest effect. Comparative hardness values of butter made from platepasteurized and Vacreator-pasteurized cream were 1·5 and 2·9 kg and 4·4 and 8·3 kg at the end of ½ and 5 h, respectively, after the completion of working. The highest setting rate, which resulted in a hardness of 6 kg at the end of 30 min, was recorded for butter made from Vacreator-pasteurized cream which was rapidly cooled to 5 deg F below normal churning temperature and churned after holding for 30 min. Abrupt breaks noted in the setting curves of this rapidly setting butter lead to speculation that changes in the butterfat crystal form may be involved

In general, the final hardness values of butter stored at 45 °F for 30–50 days were not greatly influenced by the setting rates observed at 55 °F during the 5-h period immediately after the completion of working. Exceptions to this observation were obtained when the cream was rapidly cooled to or slightly below churning temperature and also when the cooling of plate-pasteurized cream was delayed at 65 °F for 3–4 h before final cooling to the churning temperature.

The causes of the differences observed in the setting and final hardness values of butters made from plate- and Vacreator-pasteurized cream were not determined and warrant further investigation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, K. P. (1949). 63 Bretning fra Statens forsogsmejeri 38. St. Dairy Res. Inst., Hillerød, Denmark.Google Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 201.Google Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1959). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 14, 103.Google Scholar
de Man, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 360.Google Scholar
de Man, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1959 a). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Man, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1959 b). J. Dairy Res. 26, 17.Google Scholar
Huebner, V. R. & Thomsen, L. C. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, H. (1949). 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 81.Google Scholar
Olsson, T. (1948). Meddel. Statens Mejeriförsök, no. 24.Google Scholar
Olsson, T. & Swartling, P. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr. B, 185.Google Scholar
Prentice, J. H. (1953). 13th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 723.Google Scholar
Prentice, J. H. (1954). Lab. Prac. 3, 186.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, E. & Pettersson, K. I. (1937). Svenska Mejeritidn. 29, 65.Google Scholar
Tverdokhleb, G. V. (1962). 16th int. Dairy Congr. B, 155.Google Scholar
Wood, F. W. & de Man, J. M. (1956). 14th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 532.Google Scholar