Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:17:53.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunoadjuvant activity of oral Lactobacillus casei: influence of dose on the secretory immune response and protective capacity in intestinal infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gabriela Perdigón ,
Susana Alvarez  and
Aída Pesce de Ruiz Holgado
Gabriela Perdigón
Affiliation:
Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA), Chacabuco 145, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Susana Alvarez
Affiliation:
Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA), Chacabuco 145, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Aída Pesce de Ruiz Holgado
Affiliation:
Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA), Chacabuco 145, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Lactobacilli, often used as effectors of host functions, could play an important role in maintaining human health by controlling other intestinal microorganisms capable of producing harmful effects. Using an experimental model, we studied the effect of different oral doses of Lactobacillus casei on the secretory IgA response and the protective capacity of the microorganism in preventing intestinal infections. The optimization of the protective dose of Lb. casei by previous feeding and the use of the lactobacillus as an immunological way to control enteric infections were investigated. We found that conventional mice were protected against infection with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli by previous feeding for 2 consecutive days with a daily Lb. casei dose of 1·2 × 109 cfu/mouse. Previous feeding for 7 d proved less effective, and feeding for 5 d afforded no protection at all. We were also able to demonstrate that the protective effect of Lb. casei against Sal. typhimurium and Esch. coli was connected mainly with the high level of IgA antipathogen antibodies present in intestinal secretions. β-Glucuronidase (EC 3.2.1.31) and β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23) activities, measured both in the intestinal fluid and histological samples, showed a marked increase in intestinal inflammatory response on day 5 of feeding. These results show that Lb. casei plays an important role in the prevention of enteric infections, a low dose being enough for protection against intestinal infections by increasing IgA secretion into the intestinal lumen, thus providing adequate defences for the mucosal surface. A previously administered dose of this magnitude could therefore be used as an oral adjuvant in preventing enteric infections.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 1991 , pp. 485 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnaud-Battandier, F. 1982 Immunologic characteristics of isolated gut mucosal lymphoid cells. In Recent Advances in Mucosal Immunity pp. 289–299 (Eds Strober, W., Hanson, L. Å. and Sell, K. W.). New York: Raven PressGoogle Scholar
Black, R. E., Levine, M. M., Clements, L., Losonsky, G., Herrington, D., Berman, S. & Formal, S. 1987 Prevention of shigellosis by a Salmonella typhi – Shigella sonnei bivalent vaccine. Journal of Infectious Diseases 155 1260–1265Google Scholar
Bogdanov, I. G., Velichkov, V. T., Gurevich, A. I., Dalev, P. G., Kolosov, M. N., Mal'kova, V. P., Sorokina, I. B. & Khristova, L. N. 1977 Antitumor action of glycopeptides from the cell wall of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 84 1750–1753Google Scholar
Campbell, P. A. 1986 Are inflammatory phagocytes responsible for resistance to facultative Intracellular bacteria? Immunology Today 7 70–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantey, J. R. 1978 Prevention of bacterial infections of mucosal surfaces by immune secretory IgA. In Secretory Immunity and Infection pp. 461–470 (Eds McGhee, J. R., Mestecky, J. and Babb, J. L.). New York: Plenum Press (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 107)Google Scholar
Conchie, J., Findlay, J. & Levvy, G. A. 1959 Mammalian glycosidases. Distribution in the body. Biochemicalc Journal 71 318–325Google Scholar
Doherty, P. C., Allan, J. E., Lynch, F. & Ceredig, R. 1990 Dissection of an inflammatory process induced by CD 8+ T cells. Immunology Today 11 55–59Google Scholar
Engvall, E. & Perlmann, P. 1972 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA. III. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes. Journal of Immunology 109 129–135Google Scholar
Freihorst, J., Merrick, J. M. & Ogra, P. L. 1989 Effect of oral immunization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the development of specific antibacterial immunity in the lungs. Infection and Immunity 57 235–238Google Scholar
Guy-Grand, D., Griscelli, C. & Vassalli, P. 1978 The mouse gut T lymphocyte, a novel type of T cell. Nature, origin, and traffic in mice in normal and graft-versus-host conditions. Journal of Experimental Medicine 148 1661–1677Google Scholar
Lim, T. S., Messiha, N. & Watson, B. B. 1981 Immune components of the intestinal mucosae of ageing and protein deficient mice. Immunology 43 401–407Google Scholar
McQueen, C., Younushonis, W., Wolf, M. & Boedeker, E. 1986 Immune response to a live model oral vaccine against enteropathogenic E. coli: E. coli HB 101 (strain M5) expressing the AF/RI pilus. Gastroenterology 90 1547–1552Google Scholar
Miake, S., Nomoto, K., Yokokura, T., Yoshikai, Y., Mutai, M. & Nomoto, K. 1985 Protective effect of Lactobacillus casei on Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in mice. Infection and Immunity 48 480–485Google Scholar
Morgan, D. R., Dupont, H., Wood, L. V. & Kohl, S. 1984 Cytotoxicity of leukocytes from normal and Shigella-susceptible (opium-treated) guinea pigs against virulent Shigella sonnei. Infection and Immunity 46 22–24Google Scholar
Nencioni, L., Villa, L., Boraschi, D., Berti, B. & Tagliabue, A. 1983 Natural and antibody-dependent cell-mediated activity against Salmonella typhimurium by peripheral and intestinal lymphoid cells in mice. Journal of Immunology 130 903–907Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Miake, S., Hashimoto, S., Yokokura, T., Mutai, M., Yoshikai, Y. & Nomoto, K. 1985 Augmentation of host resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection by Lactobacillus casei. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Immunology 17 91–97Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. & Tannock, G. W. 1989 Colonization of the porcine gastrointestinal tract by lactobacilli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55 279–283Google Scholar
Perdigon, G., Alvarez, S., Nader De Macias, M. E., Margni, R. A., Oliver, G. & Pesce De Ruiz Holgado, A. A. 1986 Lactobacilli administered orally induce release of enzymes from peritoneal macrophages in mice. Milchwissenschaft 41 344–348Google Scholar
Perdigon, G., Alvarez, S., Nader De Macias, M. E., Roux, M. E. & Pesce De Ruiz Holgado, A. 1990 The oral administration of lactic acid bacteria increase the mucosal intestinal immunity in response to enteropathogens. Journal of Food Protection 53 404–410Google Scholar
Perdigon, G., Nader De Macias, M. E., Alvarez, S., Oliver, G. & Pesce De Ruiz Holgado, A. 1988 Systemic augmentation of the immune response in mice by feeding fermented milks with Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Immunology 63 17–23Google Scholar
Sack, R. B., Kline, R. L. & Spira, W. M. 1988 Oral immunization of rabbits with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli protects against intraintestinal challenge. Infection and Immunity 56 387–394Google Scholar
Schorlemmer, H. U., Davies, P., Hylton, W., Gugig, M. & Allison, A. C. 1977 The selective release of lysosomal acid hydrolases from mouse peritoneal macrophages by stimuli of chronic inflammation. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 58 315–325Google ScholarPubMed
Stossel, T. P. 1980 Phagocytosis. In Manual of Clinical Immunology, 2nd edn (Eds Rose, N. and Friedman, H.) Washington, DC: American Society for MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
Tagliabue, A., Nencioni, L., Villa, L., Keren, D. F., Lowell, G. H. & Boraschi, D. 1983 Antibody-dependent cell-mediated antibacterial activity of intestinal lymphocytes with secretory IgA. Nature 306 184–186Google Scholar
Tsujimoto, M., Kotani, S., Kinoshita, F., Kanoh, S., Shiba, T. & Kusumoto, S. 1986 Adjuvant activity of 6-0-acyl-muramyldipeptides to enhance primary cellular and humoral responses in guinea pigs: adaptability to various vehicles and pyrogenicity. Infection and Immunity 53 511–516Google Scholar
Underdahl, N. R., Torres Medina, A. & Doster, A. R. 1982 Effect of Streptococcus faecium C-68 in control of Escherichia coli-induced diarrhea in gnotobiotic pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 43 2227–2232Google Scholar
Underdown, B. J. & Schiff, J. M. 1986 Immunoglobulin A: strategic defense initiative at the mucosal surface. Annual Review of Immunology 4 389–417Google Scholar
Walker, W. A. 1976 Host defense mechanisms in the gastrointestinal tract. Pediatrics 57 901–916Google Scholar
Walker, W. A., Lake, A. M. & Block, K. J. 1982 Immunologic mechanisms for goblet cell mucous release: possible role in mucosal host defense. In Recent Advances in Mucosal Immunity pp. 331–342 (Eds Strober, W., Hanson, L. Å. and Sell, K. W.) New York: Raven PressGoogle Scholar