Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:10:59.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heat stability of milk: interrelationship between assay temperature, pH and agitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Douglas B. Hyslop
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic
Patrick F. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic

Summary

As determined by the standard subjective assay procedure, the minimum in the heat stability–pH curve of milk persisted down to at least 116 °C. However when samples were not agitated during heating the minimum became progressively less pronounced as the assay temperature was lowered and it disappeared at approximately 116 °C. Activation energies (Ea) for unagitated samples were approximately 30 Kcal/mole at pH 6·87 (maximum) and at pH 7·18, throughout the temperature range 116–145 °C and for the pH 6·95 (minimum) sample at 116–125 °C; however Eα for the pH 6.95 sample increased to approximately 100 Kcal/mole in the range 127–135 °C suggesting that some highly temperature-dependent reaction had occurred and caused premature coagulation at certain pH values, i.e. to a heat stability minimum. The stability of concentrated milk (20% total solids) was very low at pH values above 6·9, regardless of whether the samples were agitated or not during heating and the maximum/minimum in the heat stability–pH curve persisted down to at least 90 °C in both agitated and quiescent samples.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cole, W. C. & Tarassuk, N. P. (1946). Journal of Dairy Science 29, 421429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Hearn, C. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 159172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Morrissev, P. A. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 627646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, G. E., Deysher, E. F. & Evans, F. R. (1923). Journal of Dairy Science 6, 556568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, T. G. & Dalgleish, D. G. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 8592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, T. G., Horne, D. S. & Dalgleish, D. G. (1979). Journal of Dairy Research 46, 377380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & White, J. C. D. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 349358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & White, J. C. D. (1975 a). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 5771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & White, J. C. D. (1975 b). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, B. H. & Holm, G. E. (1932). Journal of Dairy Science 15, 345366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. C. D. & Davies, D. T. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 93102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, R. McL., Paulson, K. & Murthy, G. K. (1952). Journal of Dairy Science 35, 937948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar