Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:38:09.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The health and performance of cows fed large amounts of urea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Royce J. Treacher ,
Anthony J. Stark  and
Keith A. Collis
Royce J. Treacher
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Disease, Compton, Newbury, RG16 0NN
Anthony J. Stark
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Disease, Compton, Newbury, RG16 0NN
Keith A. Collis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Disease, Compton, Newbury, RG16 0NN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

From 6 weeks before calving to the end of lactation 2 groups of 8 cows were fed a ration incorporating a dairy nut containing 29 g/kg urea or an isocaloric isonitrogenous nut containing fish-meal and groundnut. During the 18 weeks after calving, concentrates were fed to appetite. 305-d yields of milk (7023 and 5796 kg) and lactose (345.7 and 273.4 kg) were significantly lower in the urea-fed cows (P < 0·05). Intakes of dry matter, metabolizable energy and digestible crude protein were similar in both groups until 18 weeks after calving when feeding according to yield commenced, but by 6 weeks after calving the urea-fed cows lost only 5% of their immediate post-calving weight compared with 7% in the controls. There was no evidence of ammonia toxicity in the urea-fed cows. Blood glucose concentrations were similar in both groups, but higher serum urea concentrations in the urea-fed cows suggested that there was poor utilization of ingested N. A model proposed by Roy et al. (1977) has been used to calculate the requirements of rumen-degradable protein and undegraded protein (UDP) of the 2 groups from their energy intakes and milk yields. Between 4 and 11 weeks post-calving, dietary requirement for UDP closely matched intake of UDP. It is concluded that UDP intake was a major factor in determining the peak milk yield. Mechanisms by which the degradability of the dietary protein might influence milk yield are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. M., Parr, W. H., Anderson, P. H., Berrett, S., Bradley, R. & Patterson, D. S. P. (1975). Veterinary Record 96, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. H., Berrett, S. & Patterson, D. S. P. (1976). Journal of Comparative Pathology 86, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. H., Berrett, S. & Patterson, D. S. P. (1978). Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Trinder, N. (1966). Journal of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne Agricultural Society 20, 21.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. W. (1975). Veterinary Record 96, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1968). Journal of Animal Science 27, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1970). Proceedings of Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, p. 64.Google Scholar
Dinning, J. S., Briggs, H. M., Gallup, W. D., Orr, H. W. & Butler, R. (1948).American Journal of Physiology 153, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonnesbeck, P. V., Kearl, L. C. & Harris, L. E. (1975). Journal of Animal Science 40, 1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. J. H. (1965). Journal of Comparative Pathology 75, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. J. H. & Lawrence, J. A. (1965). Journal of Comparative Pathology 75, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glencross, R. G., Munro, I. B., Senior, B. E. & Pope, G. S. (1973). Acta Endocrinologica 73, 374.Google Scholar
Goodrich, R. D., Meiske, J. C. & Gharib, F. H. (1972). World Review of Animal Production 8(4), 54.Google Scholar
Hackley, B. M., Smith, J. C. & Halsted, J. A. (1968). Clinical Chemistry 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, W. J. (1963). Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 23, 20.Google Scholar
Helmer, L. G. & Bartley, E. E. (1971). Journal of Dairy Science 54, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T. (1975). Journal of Animal Science 41, 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T., Polan, C. E. & Hillman, D. (1968). Journal of Animal Science 27, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. H. & Jimenez, A. A. (1974). Feedstuffs 46(11), 26.Google Scholar
Juhász, B., Szegedi, B. & Kerešztes, M. (1975). Tracer studies on non-protein nitrogen for ruminants 2, 123. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
Kertz, A. F. & Everett, J. P. Jr (1975). Journal of Animal Science 41, 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczuk, J. (1970). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 53, 926.Google Scholar
Leonard, M. C., Buttery, P. J. & Lewis, D. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, W., Vagg, M. J., Collis, K. A., Shaw, S. R. & Gleed, P. T. (1978). Research in Veterinary Science. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Manston, R. (1971). Biochemical Medicine 4, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Mudd, A. J. & Mackie, I. L. (1973). Veterinary Record 93, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. & Kay, R. N. B. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paglia, D. E. & Valentine, W. N. (1967). Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 70, 158.Google Scholar
Paquay, R., De Baere, R. & Lousse, A. (1972). British Journal of Nutrition 27, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1938). Journal of Dairy Research 9, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. J., Little, W., Manston, R. & Dew, S. M. (1974). Journal of Agricultural Science 83, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Flevohof, Netherlands. (Publications, European Association of Animal Production, no. 22.)Google Scholar
Scales, G. H. (1974). Proceedings of New Zealand Society of Animal Production 34, 103.Google Scholar
Segerson, E. C., Murray, F. A., Moxon, A. L., Redman, D. R. & Conrad, H. R. (1977). Journal of Dairy Science 60, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Szasz, G., Gerhardt, W., Gruber, W. & Bernt, E. (1976). Clinical Chemistry 22, 1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, E. & Ford, E. J. H. (1969). Journal of Pathology 97, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, R. J. & Collis, K. A. (1977). Research in Veterinary Science 22, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Little, W., Collis, K. A. & Stark, A. J. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, A. I. (1966). Science 153, 1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, D. H. & Mellanby, J. (1974). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 2nd edn, vol. 4, p. 1836. (Ed. Bergmeyer, H. U..) London and New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. S. & Judson, G. J. (1976). British Veterinary Journal 132, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. S. & Hicks, J. M. (1965). Journal of Clinical Pathology 18, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar