Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:30:18.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fractionation of bovine serum lipoproteins and their characterization by gradient gel electrophoresis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

P. E. Brumby
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
V. A. Welch
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Summary

Bovine serum lipoproteins were fractionated by precipitation with dextran sulphate followed by ultracentrifugation and were examined by paper electrophoresis and by disk electophoresis in acrylamide gels. Gels containing concentration gradients of both sucrose and acrylamide gave better resolution of lipoproteins than did gels of uniform composition or gels with a concentration gradient of sucrose and a uniform concentration of acrylamide.

The densities of the lipoprotein classes isolated (listed in order of increasing mobility on electrophoresis in acrylamide gels) were as follows:

I, d < 1·019; II, 1·039 <d<1·050;

III, 1·019 <d<1·039; IVa and IVb, d > 1·050.

Lipoproteins of classes I, II and III were precipitated by dextran sulphate. On paper electrophoresis, lipoproteins of class II had β mobility and lipoproteins of classes IVa and IVb had α mobility. Lipoproteins of class I remained at the origin.

The lipoprotein classes of bovine sera resembled those of sheep and goat sera in that class IV predominated. In contrast, the sera of several non-ruminant species showed a predominance of lipoprotein classes of low electrophoretic mobility.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beaton, G. H., Selby, A. E. & Wright, A. M. (1961). J. biol. Chem. 236, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C., Davies, T., Glascock, R. F. & Welch, V. A. (1969). Biochem. J. 113, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, M. & Samaille, J. (1957). J. Physiol., Paris 49, 83Google Scholar
Burstein, M. & Samaille, J. (1958). Clinica chim. Acta 3, 320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, M. & Samaille, J. (1960). Clinica chim. Acta 5, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, D. G. & Kruger, F. A. (1961). J. Lipid Res. 2, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dangerfield, W. G. & Faulkner, G. (1964). Clinica chim. Acta 10, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. J. (1964). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 121, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, E., Houvras, Y. & Zak, B. (1968). Clinica chim. Acta 20, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L., Patton, S. & McCarthy, R. D. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, D. S., Levy, R. I. & Lees, R. S. (1967). New Engl. J. Med. 276, 32, 94, 148, 215, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glascock, R. F., Welch, V. A., Bishop, C., Davies, T., Wright, E. W. & Noble, R. C. (1966). Biochem. J. 98, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griel, L. C. Jr & McCarthy, R. D. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, F. T. & Nichols, A. V. (1960). In The Plasma Proteins, Vol. 2, p. 1. (Ed. Putnam, F. W..) New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lossow, W. J., Lindgren, F. T., Murchio, J. C., Stevens, G. R. & Jensen, L. C. (1969). J. Lipid Res. 10, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, H. J. & Ribeiro, L. P. (1959). Clinica chim. Acta 4, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. & Kenrick, K. G. (1967). Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 27, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. & Kenrick, K. G. (1968). Analyt. Biochem. 25, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, K. A. (1967). Analyt. Biochem. 18, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, K. A., Creinin, H. L. & Kummerow, F. A. (1966). J. Lipid Res. 7, 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, K. A., Narayan, S. & Kummerow, F. A. (1965). Nature, Lond., 205, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. J. & Dangerfield, W. G. (1969). Clinica chim. Acta 23, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. & Rook, J. A. F. (1965). Biochem. J. 96, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar