Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:01:41.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The formation of 2-butanone and 2-butanol in Cheddar cheese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. R. Keen
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
N. J. Walker
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
M. F. Peberdy
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

The bacteriological formation of 2-butanone and 2-butanol was investigated. The data suggest that 2-butanol is formed in cheese via 2-butanone in 3 steps, each step being carried out specifically by a different microbial species. Suitable species have been isolated from a single cheese. The first step could be carried out (in the present investigation) either by certain starter organisms or by a strain of Pediococcus cerevisiae. This strain formed substantial amounts of 2,3-butylene glycol in milk, presumably from citrate, but could not metabolize this compound further. A second micro-organism, a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum, was isolated which, in Cheddar cheese, could convert 2,3-butylene glycol into 2-butanone. The final reduction of 2-butanone to 2-butanol could be readily carried out in MRS medium by a strain of L. brevis. Results from cheese made aseptically indicate that 2-butanone is formed in Cheddar cheese only when non-starter organisms are present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amerine, M. A., Pangborn, R. M. & Roessler, E. B. (1965). In Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food, p. 330. (Eds Anson, M. L., Mrak, E. M., Chichester, C. O. and Stewart, G. F..) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bills, D. D., Willits, R. E. & Day, E. A. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantoni, C. & Molnar, M. R. (1967). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 30, 197.Google Scholar
Dacre, J. C. (1953). Journal of Dairy Research 20, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacre, J. C. (1958). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, E. A., Bassette, R. & Keeney, M. (1960). Journal of Dairy Science 43, 463.Google Scholar
de Man, J. C., Rogosa, M. & Sharpe, M. E. (1960). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finar, I. L. (1959). Organic Chemistry, p. 159, 3rd ed.London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Keen, A. R. & Walker, N. J. (1973). Analytical Biochemistry 52, 475.Google Scholar
Keen, A. R. & Walker, N. J. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 65.Google Scholar
Kroger, M. & Patton, S. (1964). Journal of Dairy Science 47, 296.Google Scholar
Langler, J. E. & Day, E. A. (1964). Journal of Dairy Science 47, 1291.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. C. (1963). Journal of Dairy Research 30, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, J. & Sharpe, M. E. (1958). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, K. D. & McGillivray, W. A. (1964). Journal of Dairy Research 31, 155.Google Scholar
Scarpellino, R. J. (1961). Dissertation Abstracts 22, 421.Google Scholar
Scarpellino, R. & Kosikowski, F. V. (1958). Journal of Dairy Science 41, 718.Google Scholar
Scarpellino, R. & Kosikowski, F. V. (1962). Journal of Dairy Science 45, 343.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M. E., Fryer, T. F. & Smith, D. G. (1966). In Identification Methods for Microbiologists A, p. 65. (Eds Gibbs, B. M. and Skinner, F. A..) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherwood, I. R. (1939). Journal of Dairy Research 10, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolov, M. & Smiley, K. L. (1960). Journal of Bacteriology 79, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar