Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:20:56.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk.: I. Effect of serum phase components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

David S. Horne
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland, KA6 5HL
Thomas G. Parker
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland, KA6 5HL

Summary

By resuspending casein micelles in whey and dialysate it is shown that the role of whey proteins in the ethanol (EtOH)-induced coagulation of skim-milk is minimal. Experiments involving the interchange of milk sera indicated that the position of the EtOH stability/pH profile along the pH axis was governed by the diffusible constituents of the milk serum phase. The identities of those serum components governing the shape and position of the EtOH stability/pH profile were investigated. The addition of Ca2+ caused a shift in the entire profile to higher pH. Reduction of the available Ca2+ by addition of EDTA (up to 5 ran) shifted the profile to lower pH. The addition of phosphate (up to 5 mM) or citrate (up to 1 mM) had no effect on the profile, though higher concentrations of citrate (up to 5 mMi) caused slight shifts to lower pH. When equimolar amounts of Ca and phosphate were added, the system showed a shift in profile approximately equivalent to that of the free Ca introduced. Increasing the ionic strength of a milk by the addition of NaCl did not shift the profile, but decreased the maximum EtOH stability of the high pH arm of the sigmoidal profile. The EtOH stability/pH profile retained the same sigmoidal shape in all cases.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benton, A. G. (1935). In Fundamentals of Dairy Science, 2nd edn, p. 194. (American Chemical Society Monograph no. 41.) New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Browne, F. L. (1939). In Casein and its Industrial Applications, 2nd Edn, p. 19. (Ed. Sutermeister, E. and Browne, F. L..) New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1958), Journal of Dairy Research 25, 256266.Google Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Hearn, C. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 149157.Google Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Morrissey, P. A. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 627646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. & Muir, D. D. (1979). Journal of Dairy Research 46, 433439.Google Scholar
Horne, D. S. & Parker, T. G. (1980). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal (in the Press).Google Scholar
Horne, D. S. & Parker, T. G. (1981). Journal of Dairy Research 34, 126130.Google Scholar
Linderstrøm-Lang, K. (1924). Comptes Rendus des Travaux du Laboratoire Carlsberg 15, no. 7.Google Scholar
Mitamura, K. (1937). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University 41, 97362.Google Scholar
Morrissey, P. A. (1969). Journal of Dairy Research 36, 343351.Google Scholar
Ramsdell, G. A., Johnson, W. T. & Evans, F. R. (1931). Journal of Dairy Science 14, 93106.Google Scholar
SilléN, L. G. & Martell, A. E. (1964). Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes. 2nd Edn. (Chemical Society Special Publication no. 17). London: Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Sommer, H. H. & Binney, T. H. (1923). Journal of Dairy Science 6, 176197.Google Scholar
Southward, C. R. & Aird, R. M. (1978). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 13, 7796.Google Scholar
White, J. C. D. & Davies, D. T. (1956). 14th International Dairy Congress, Rome 1 (2), 288298.Google Scholar