Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:51:26.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for the presence of restriction/modification systems in Lactobacillus delbrueckii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Viviana Suárez ,
Miriam Zago ,
Giorgio Giraffa ,
Jorge Reinheimer  and
Andrea Quiberoni
Viviana Suárez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Lactología Industrial (UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Santiago del Estero 2829, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
Miriam Zago
Affiliation:
Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Settore di Ricerca ‘Lattiero-Caseario’, Via Lombardo 11, 26900 Lodi, Italy
Giorgio Giraffa
Affiliation:
Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Settore di Ricerca ‘Lattiero-Caseario’, Via Lombardo 11, 26900 Lodi, Italy
Jorge Reinheimer
Affiliation:
Instituto de Lactología Industrial (UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Santiago del Estero 2829, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
Andrea Quiberoni*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Lactología Industrial (UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Santiago del Estero 2829, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bacteriophages Cb1/204 and Cb1/342 were obtained by induction from the commercial strain Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis Cb1, and propagated on Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis 204 (Lb.l 204) and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 342 (Lb.b 342), respectively. By cross sensitivity, it was possible to detect a delay in the lysis of Lb.l 204 with Cb1/342 phage, while the adsorption rate was high (99·5%). Modified and unmodified phages were isolated using phage Cb1/342 and strain Lb.l 204. The EOP (Efficiency of Plaquing) values for the four phages (Cb1/204, Cb1/342, Cb1/342modified and Cb1/342unmodified) suggested that an R/M system modified the original temperate phage, and the BglII-DNA restriction patterns of these phages might point out the presence of a Type II R/M system. Also, the existence of a Type I R/M system was demonstrated by PCR and nucleotide sequence, being the percentages of alignment homology with Type I R/M systems reported previously higher than 95%. In this study it was possible to demonstrate that the native phage resistant mechanisms and the occurrence of prophages in commercial host strains, contribute strongly to diversify the phage population in a factory environment.

Keywords

Restriction/modification systemlysogenybacteriophagesLactobacillus delbrueckii
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , November 2009 , pp. 433 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, G & Klaenhammer, T 1998 Phage resistance mechanisms in lactic acid bacteria. International Dairy Journal 8 207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auad, L, Ascárate, Peril A, Ruiz Holgado, A & Raya, R 1998 Evidence of a restriction/modification system in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis CNRZ 326. Current Microbiology 36 271–273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrangou, R, Fremaux, C, Deveau, H, Richards, M, Boyaval, P, Moineau, S, Romero, DA & Horvath, P 2007 CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes. Science 315 1709–1712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourniquel, A 2000 Molecuar insights into the metabolism and physiology of the lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis. Thesis Department of Molecular Microbiology Biozentrum der Universitaet Basel Basel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Bourniquel, A, Casey, M, Mollet, B & Pridmore, D 2002 DNA sequence and functional analysis of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis plasmids pN42 and pJBL2. Plasmid 47 153–157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Candioti, MC, Hynes, ER, Perotti, MC & Zalazar, CA 2002 Proteolytic activity of commercial rennets and pure enzymes on whey proteins. Milchwissenschaft 57 546–550Google Scholar
Carminati, D & Giraffa, G 1992 Evidence and characterization of temperate bacteriophage in Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus St18. Journal of Dairy Research 59 71–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carminati, D, Mazzucotelli, G, Giraffa, G & Neviani, E 1997 Incidence of inducible bacteriophage in Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from natural whey starter cultures. Journal of Dairy Science 80 1505–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, A & Ross, P 2002 Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starters strains: molecular analysis to application. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek 82 303–321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, B, Powell, IB & Hillier, AJ 1990 Temperate bacteriophages and lysogeny in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbioogyl Reviews 87 79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de los Reyes-Gavilán, C, Linsowtin, G, Séchaud, L, Veaux, M & Accolas, J-P 1990 Evidence for a plasmid – linked to restriction – modification system in Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56 3412–3419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveau, H, Barrangou, R, Garneau, JE, Labonté, J, Fremaux, C, Boyaval, P, Romero, DA, Horvath, P & Moineau, S 2008 Phage Response to CRISPR-Encoded Resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. Journal of Bacteriology 190 1390–1400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giraffa, G, De Vecchi, P & Reinheimer, JA 1997 Population dynamics of thermophilic lactobacilli in mixed starter whey cultures. Food Research International 302 137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraffa, G & Rosetti, L 2004 Monitoring of the bacterial composition of dairy starter cultures by RAPD-PCR. FEMS Microbiology Letters 237 133–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Josephsen, J & Neve, H 1998 Bacteriophages and lactic acid bacteria. In Lactic Acid Bacteria Microbiology and Functional Aspects, pp. 385–436 (Eds Salminen, S & Wright, A von). New York: Marcel Decker IncGoogle Scholar
Klaenhammer, TR & Fitzgerald, GF 1994 Bacteriophages and bacteriophage resistance. In Genetics and Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria, pp. 106–158 (Eds Gasson, MJ & de Vos, WN). London: Chapman & HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrie, S & Moineau, S 2007 Abortive influence mechanisms and prophage sequences significantly influence genetic makeaup of emerging lytic lactococal phages. Journal of Bacteriology 189 1482–1487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moineau, S, Tremblay, D & Labrie, S 2002 Phages of lactic acid bacteria: from genomics to industrial applications. American Society for Microbiology News 68 388–393Google Scholar
Murray, N 2000 Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines a legacy of Bertani and Weigle. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64 2412–434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neviani, E & Carini, S 1994 Microbiology of Parmesan cheese. Microbiologie Aliments Nutrition 12 1–8Google Scholar
Quiberoni, A, Guglielmotti, D, Binetti, A & Reinheimer, J 2004 Characterization of three Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus phages and the physicochemical analysis of phage adsorption. Journal of Applied Microbiology 96 340–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiberoni, A, Reinheimer, J & Tailliez, P 1998 Characterization of Lactobacillus helveticus phage resistant mutants by RAPD fingerngerprints and phenotypic parameters. Food Research International 31 537–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinheimer, JA, Suárez, VB, Bailo, NB & Zalazar, CA 1995 Microbiological and technological characteristics of natural whey cultures for Argentinian hard-cheese production. Journal of Food Protection 58 7796–799CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinheimer, J, Quiberoni, A, Tailliez, P, Binetti, A & Suárez, V 1996 The lactic acid microflora of natural whey starters used in Argentina. International Dairy Journal 6 869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambrook, J & Russell, DW 2001 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Schouler, C, Clier, F, Lerayer, AL, Ehrlich, DS & Chopin, M-L 1998 A type IC restriction-modification system in Lactococcus lactis. Journal of Bacteriology 180 2407–411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Séchaud, L, Callegari, M-L, Rousseau, M, Muller, M-C & Accolas, J-P 1989 Relationship between temperate bacteriophage 0241 and virulent phage 832-B1 of Lactobacillus helveticus. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 43 261–277Google Scholar
Séchaud, L, Cluzel, P-J, Rousseau, M, Baumgartner, A & Accolas, J-P 1988 Bacteriophages of lactobacilli. Biochimie 70 401–410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Séchaud, L, Rousseau, M, Fayard, B, Callegari, ML, Quénée, P & Accolas, J-P 1992 Comparative study of 35 bacteriophages of Lactobacillus helveticus: morphology and host range. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58 1011–1018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suárez, V, Zago, M, Quiberoni, A, Carminati, D, Giraffa, G & Reinheimer, J 2008 Lysogeny in Lactobacillus delbrueckii strains and characterization of two new temperate prolate-headed bacteriophages. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105 1402–1411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, V & Christiansson, A 1991 Methods for phage monitoring. FIL-IDF Bulletin 263 29–39Google Scholar
Tock, M & Dryden, D 2005 The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Current Opinion in Microbiology 8 466–472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Guchte, M, Penaud, S, Grimaldi, C, Barbe, V, Bryson, K, Nicolas, P, Robert, C, Oztas, S, Mangenot, S, Couloux, A, Loux, V, Dervyn, R, Bossy, R, Bolotin, A, Batto, JM, Walunas, T, Gibrat, JF, Bessières, P, Weissenbach, J, Ehrlich, SD & Maguin, E 2006 The complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus bulgaricus reveals extensive and ongoing reductive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 9274–9279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, KR, Alberts, BM, Benzinger, R, Lawhorne, L & Treiber, G 1970 Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. Virology 40 734–744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed