Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:47:36.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency of cleaning agents for an inorganic membrane after milk ultrafiltration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Georges Daufin ,
Uzi Merin ,
François-Louis Kerherve ,
Jean-Pierre Labbe ,
Auguste Quemerais  and
Charles Bousser
Georges Daufin
Affiliation:
INRA, Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitière, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cédex, France
Uzi Merin
Affiliation:
Dairy Science Laboratory, Agricultwal Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bel Dagan 50250, Israel
François-Louis Kerherve
Affiliation:
INRA, Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitière, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cédex, France
Jean-Pierre Labbe
Affiliation:
École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, 11 rue P. et M. Curie, 75231 Paris Cédex 05, France
Auguste Quemerais
Affiliation:
Université Rennes 1, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Spectroscopie, Avenue du Général Leclerc, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cédex, France
Charles Bousser
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherche Appliquée, Henkel France, 51000 Châlons sur Marne, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cleaning of inorganic membranes after ultrafiltration (UF) of skim milk has been assessed using hydraulic, physicochemical and spectroscopic (i.r. and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) measurements. A cleaning sequence using hypochlorite alone or hypochlorite followed by HNO3 restored the membrane hydraulic resistance, in contrast to cleaning with HNO3 alone. When using NaOH, addition of Ca complexants (EDTA, gluconate, tripolyphosphate) and surfactants was required to obtain similar results. Three types of criteria (hydraulic, kinetic, chemical) are available to assess the effect of the sequestrant and surfactant types. In all the cases studied, traces of protein and Ca were detected on and within the membrane after cleaning. Nevertheless, it was concluded that it is possible to develop a single-step alkaline product to clean inorganic milk UF membranes if suitable surfactants and Ca sequestrants are included in its formula.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armishaw, R. F. 1982 Inorganic fouling of membranes during ultrafiltration of casein whey. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 17 213–228Google Scholar
Bragulla, S. & Lintner, K. 1986 [Basics of cleaning and disinfection for ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and electro-dialysis plants.] Alimenta 25 (5) 111–118Google Scholar
Cheryan, M. 1986 Ultrafiltration Handbook. Lancester, PA: Technomic Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Daufin, G., Merin, U., Labbe, J.-P., Quemerais, A. & Kerherve, F.-L. 1990 Cleaning of inorganic membranes after whey and milk ultrafiltration. Proceedings, International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes, Vol. I pp. 270–272. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Goudedranche, H., Maubois, J.-L., Ducruet, P. & Mahaut, M. 1980 Utilization of the new mineral UF membranes for making semi-hard cheeses. Desalination 35 243–258Google Scholar
Kane, D. R. & Middlemiss, N. E. 1985 Cleaning chemicals–state of the knowledge in 1985. In Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing, pp. 312–335 (Eds Lund, D., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison Extension DuplicatingGoogle Scholar
Kuaye, A. Y. 1988 Study of sodium hydroxide action on fouling of heat transfer surfaces during milk pasteurization. Thesis Dr Ing. ENSIA, Massy, FranceGoogle Scholar
Labbe, J.-P., Quemerais, A., Michel, F., & Daufin, G. 1990 Fouling of inorganic membranes during whey ultrafiltration: analytical methodology. Journal of Membrane Science 51 293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luss, G. 1984 Fouling and cleaning in membrane processes involved in dairy applications. Proceedings, Whey Products Conference pp. 93–115. Philadelphia, PA: USDA Agricultural Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
Maubois, J. L., Pierre, A., Fauquant, J. & Piot, M. 1987 Industrial fractionation of main whey proteins. International Dairy Federation Bulletin no. 212 154–159Google Scholar
Nisbet, T. J., Thorn, T. M. & Wood, P. W. 1981 Observations on the fouling of polysulphone ultrafiltration membranes by acid whey. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 16 113–120Google Scholar
Plett, E. A. 1985 Cleaning of fouled surfaces. In Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing pp. 286–311 (Eds Lund, D., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Extension DuplicatingGoogle Scholar
Tarnawski, V. R. & Jelen, P. 1986 Estimation of compaction and fouling effects during membrane processing of Cottage cheese whey. Journal of Food Engineering 5 75–90Google Scholar
Tzeng, W. C. & Zall, R. 1990 Combining polymers with chemical, thermal and turbulent conditions to clean an ultrafiltration membrane fouled with milk. Process Biochemistry International 25 71–78Google Scholar
Van Den Berg, G. B. & Smolders, C. A. 1988 Flux decline in membrane processes. Filtration and Separation March-April 115–121Google Scholar
Vetier, G., Bennasar, M. & Tarodo De La Fuente, B. 1988 Study of the fouling of a mineral micofiltration membrane using scanning electron microscopy and physicocbemical analyses in the processing of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 55 381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zottola, E. A., Cogan, T. M. & Kelly, J. 1987 Partition of lactic streptococcal bacteriophage during the ultrafiltration concentration of milk and whey. Journal of Dairy Science 70 2013–2121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed