Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:02:40.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of automatic cluster removal and feeding during milking on milking efficiency, milk yield and milk fat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2016

Sabine Ferneborg ,
Larissa Stadtmüller ,
Jana Pickova ,
Lars Wiking  and
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Sabine Ferneborg*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
Larissa Stadtmüller
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden Livestock System Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Germany
Jana Pickova
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
Lars Wiking
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Denmark
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to increase milking efficiency, the effects of two different cluster take-off levels (200 and 800 g/min) and feeding vs. not feeding during milking were tested in a Latin square design study including 32 cows. Milk yield, milking time, milk flow and milking interval were measured and milk samples were analysed for gross composition, sodium and potassium concentration, free fatty acid (FFA) content, milk fat globule (MFG) size, MFG membrane (MFGM) material and fatty acid composition. Residual milk was harvested to evaluate udder emptying. Increasing the take-off level from 200 to 800 g/min at the whole udder level decreased milking time and increased harvest flow. Udder emptying decreased slightly, but there were no effects on milk yield, FFA content or MFGM. There were interactive effects of take-off level and feeding during milking on content of fatty acids C4:0, C6:0, C16:0, C18:3(n-3) and C20:0. Feeding during milking increased milk yield per day and decreased milking interval. Sodium and potassium concentrations in milk were unaffected by treatments, indicating no loss of tight junction integrity. From these results, it is clear that feeding during milking should be used to increase milk yield and improve milking efficiency, regardless of take-off level used, and that the effect of feeding is more pronounced when a low take-off level is used. Feeding seemed to counteract the effects of the low take-off level on milking time and milking interval. Low take-off levels can therefore be used in combination with feeding.

Keywords

Dairy cowcluster removalmilking efficiencymilk yieldmilk fatFFA
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 180 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, DV, Bickert, WG, Gerrish, JB & Spike, PW 1970 Automatic milking machine removal. Journal of Dairy Science 53 658Google Scholar
Briard, V, Leconte, N, Michel, F & Michalski, M-C 2003 The fatty acid composition of small and large naturally occurring milk fat globules. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 105 677–682Google Scholar
Burke, J & Jago, J 2011 Comparing somatic cell counts, production and milking durations of dairy cows when milked at two automatic cup-removal flow-rate thresholds. Animal Production Science 51 920–924Google Scholar
Clarke, T, Cuthbertson, EM, Greenall, RK, Hannah, MC, Jongman, E & Shoesmith, D 2004 Milking regimes to shorten milking duration. Journal of Dairy Research 71 419–426Google Scholar
Deeth, HC, Fitz-Gerald, CH & Wood, AF 1975 A convenient method for determining the extent of lipolysis in milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 30 109–111Google Scholar
Edwards, J, Jago, J & Lopez-Villalobos, N 2013 Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 96 1886–1893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez-Cortés, P, Bodas, R, Mantecón, AR, de la Fuente, MA & Manso, T 2011 Milk composition and fatty acid profile of residual and available milk from ewes fed with diets supplemented with different vegetable oils. Small Ruminant Research 97 72–75Google Scholar
Hernandez, LL, Wheelock, JB, Shwartz, G, Baumgard, LH, Parkhurst, AM & Collier, RJ 2007 Effects of intramammary infusions of serotonin (5-HT) and methysergide (METH), a 5-HT antagonist, on milk production and composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 85 208–208Google Scholar
Hernandez, LL, Collier, JL, Vomachka, AJ, Collier, RJ & Horseman, ND 2011 Suppression of lactation and acceleration of involution in the bovine mammary gland by a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Journal of Endocrinology 209 45–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jago, J, Burke, J & Williamson, J 2010 Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration. Journal of Dairy Science 93 2541–2549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, B, Uvnäs-Moberg, K, Knight, CH & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 1999 Effect of feeding before, during and after milking on milk production and the hormones oxytocin, prolactin, gastrin and somatostatin. Journal of Dairy Research 66 151–163Google Scholar
Kennett, JE, Poletini, MO, Firch, CA, & Freeman, ME 2009 Antagonism of oxytocin prevents suckling and estradiol induced, but not progesterone induced secretion of prolactin. Endocrinology 150 2292–2299Google Scholar
Kernohan, EA & Lepherd, E 1969 Size distribution of fat globules in cow's milk during milking, measured with a Coulter counter. Journal of Dairy Research 36 177–182Google Scholar
Knight, C 1994 Short-term oxytocin treatment increases bovine milk yield by enhancing milk removal without any direct action on mammary metabolism. Journal of Endocrinology 142 471–473Google Scholar
Lacasse, P, Lollivier, V, Dessauge, F, Bruckmaier, RM, Ollier, S & Boutinaud, M 2012 new developments on the gaöactopoietic role of prolactin in dairy ruminants. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 43 154–160Google Scholar
Larsen, MK, Weisbjerg, MR, Kristensen, CB & Mortensen, G 2012 Short communication: within-day variation in fatty acid composition of milk from cows in an automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Science 95 5608–5611Google Scholar
Lollivier, V, Guinard-Flament, J, Ollivier-Bousquet, M & Marnet, P-G 2002 Oxytocin and milk removal; two important sources of variation in milk production and milk quality during and between milkings. Reproduction Nutrition Development 42 173–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lollivier, V, Lacasse, P, Arizala, JA, Lamberton, P, Wiart, S, Portanguen, J, Bruckmaier, RM & Boutinaud, M 2015 In vivo inhibition followed by exogenous supplementation demonstrates galactopoietc effects of prolactin on mammary tissue and milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98 8775–8787CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, C, Briard-Bion, V, Ménard, O, Beaucher, E, Rousseau, F, Fauquant, J, Leconte, N & Robert, B 2011 Fat globules selected from whole milk according to their size: different compositions and structure of the biomembrane, revealing sphingomyelin-rich domains. Food Chemistry 125 355–368Google Scholar
Magliaro, AL & Kensinger, RS 2005 Automatic cluster remover settings affects milk yield and machine-on time in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 148–153Google Scholar
Natzke, R, Everett, R & Bray, D 1982 Effect of overmilking on udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 65 117–125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neijenhuis, F, Barkema, HW, Hogeveen, H & Noordhuizen, JPTM 2000 Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83 2795–2804Google Scholar
Ollivier-Bousquet, M 2002 Milk lipid and protein traffic in mammary epithelial cells: joint and independent pathways. Reproduction Nutrition Development 42 149–162Google Scholar
Ontsouka, CE, Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 2003 Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrum and mature milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86 2005–2011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peaker, M & Wilde, CJ 1996 Feedback control of milk secretion from milk. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 1 307–315Google Scholar
Prescott, N, Mottram, T & Webster, A 1998 Relative motivations of dairy cows to be milked or fed in a Y-maze and an automatic milking system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57 23–33Google Scholar
Rahmatyar, Z & Wiking, L 2012 Fatty acid composition and thermal behavior of small and large milk fat globules. Milchwissenschaft – Milk Science International 67 34–38Google Scholar
Rasmussen, MD 1993 Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 60 287–297Google Scholar
Rasmussen, MD 2004 Overmilking and teat condition. In Proceedings of the NMC Annual Meeting , pp. 169–175Google Scholar
Rushen, J, de Passillé, AMB & Munksgaard, L 1999 Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science 82 720–727Google Scholar
Samuelsson, B, Wahlberg, E, Svennersten, K 1993 The effect of feeding during milking on milk production and milk flow. Swedish Journal of Agricultural research 23 101–106Google Scholar
Samuelsson, B, Uvnäs-Moberg, K, Gorewit, RC & Svennersten- Sjaunja, K 1996 Profiles of the hormones somatostatin, gastrin, CCK, prolactin, growth hormone and cortisol. I. In dairy cows that are milked and fed separately or milked and fed simultaneously. Livestock Production Science 46 49–56Google Scholar
Shingfield, K, Ahvenjarvi, S, Toivonen, V, Arola, A, Nurmela, K, Huhtanen, P & Griinari, JM 2003 Effect of dietary fish oil on biohydrogenation of fatty acids and milk fatty acid content in cows. Animal Science 77 165–180Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Farr, VC, Davis, SR & Prosser, CG 1995 EGTA-induced disruption of epithelial cell tight junctions in the lactating caprine mammary gland. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 38 R848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S, Godden, S, Rapnicki, P, Reid, D, Johnson, A & Eicker, S 2002 Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 85 818–823Google Scholar
Svennersten, K & Barrefors, P 1991 Effect of local stimulation on fatty-acid composition in milk. Milchwissenschaft-Milk Science International 46 507–509Google Scholar
Svennersten, K, Gorewit, RC, Sjaunja, LO & Uvnäs-Moberg, K 1995 Feeding during milking enhances milking-related oxytocin secretion and milk production in dairy cows whereas food deprivation decreases it. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 153 309–310Google Scholar
Tančin, V, Ipema, B, Hogewerf, P & Mačuhová, J 2006 Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. Journal of Dairy Science 89 978–988Google Scholar
Timmen, H & Patton, S 1988 Milk fat globules: fatty acid composition, size and in vivo regulation of fat liquidity. Lipids 23 685–689Google Scholar
Wiking, L 2005 Milk fat globule stability: Lipolysis with special reference to automatic milking systems. PhD thesis. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
Wiking, L, Björck, L & Nielsen, JH 2003 Influence of feed composition on stability of fat globules during pumping of raw milk. International Dairy Journal 13 797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiking, L, Stagsted, J, Björck, L & Nielsen, JH 2004 Milk fat globule size is affected by fat production in dairy cows. International Dairy Journal 14 909–913Google Scholar
Volden, H 2011 NorFor - The Nordic Feed Evaluation System. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar