Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:30:50.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of α- and β-adrenergic agonists on intramammary pressure and milk flow in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Rupert Bruckmaier
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie der Süddeutsche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt für Milchivirtschaft, Technische Universität München, 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan, Deutschland
Harald Mayer
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie der Süddeutsche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt für Milchivirtschaft, Technische Universität München, 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan, Deutschland
Dieter Schams
Affiliation:
Institut für Physiologie der Süddeutsche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt für Milchivirtschaft, Technische Universität München, 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan, Deutschland

Summary

α-Adrenergic mimetics inhibit milk removal whereas β-adrenergic mimetics have a favourable effect upon milk removal in dairy cows. This work aimed to relate these effects to the milk ejection reflex mechanism and/or milk flow from the cisternal cavities only. The α-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine and the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol were injected prior to and after milk ejection. Applied after milk ejection, the phenylephrine treatment reduced intramammary pressure (IMP) and milk yield markedly. Phenylephrine application before milk ejection prevented IMP from rising during teat stimulation or after oxytocin injection. Milking produced small amounts of milk at minimal milk flow rates. The very different responses to phenylephrine application prior to and after milk ejection indicate separate adrenergic inhibitory mechanisms for milk ejection and milk flow. The application of the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol did not alter the IMP. Nevertheless, this compound improved milk removal by increasing milk flow. The observation of bimodal milk flow at milkings without preceding teat stimulation indicates a delayed milk ejection. Isoproterenol injection without teat stimulation enhanced milk flow rates, but the bimodality remained unchanged. We conclude that isoproterenol enhances milk flow without affectiiig milk ejection.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernabé, J. & Peeters, G. 1980 Studies on the motility of smooth muscles of the teats in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Research 47 259275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blum, J. W., Schams, D. & Bruckmaier, R. 1989 Catecholamines, oxytocin and milk removal in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 56 167177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, W. Y. 1965 Mechanism of epinephrine inhibition of the milk ejecting response to oxytocin. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 147 4853Google ScholarPubMed
Gorewit, R. G. 1978 Effect of epinephrine hydrochloride on oxytocin release and milk yield in lactating cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 61 Supp1. 1 148Google Scholar
Gorewit, R. C. 1979 Method for determining oxytocin concentrations in unextracted sera; characterization in lactating cattle. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 160 8087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorewit, R. C. & Gassman, K. B. 1985 Effects of duration of udder stimulation on milking dynamics and oxytocin release. Journal of Dairy Science 68 18131818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J. 1981 [The influence of β2-mimetic substance (Planipart) on the milking behaviour of cows.] Tierärztliche Umschau 36 287290Google Scholar
Lefcourt, A. M. 1982 Rhythmic contractions of the teat sphincter in bovines: an expulsion mechanism. American Journal of Physiology 242 R181184Google ScholarPubMed
Lefcourt, A. M. & Akers, A. M. 1984 Small increases in peripheral noradrenaline inhibit the milk-ejection response by means of a peripheral mechanism. Journal of Endocrinology 100 337344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lincoln, D. W. & Paisley, A. C. 1982 Neuroendocrine control of milk ejection. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 65 571586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, H., Bruckmaier, R. & Schams, D. 1991 Lactational changes in oxytocin release, intramammary pressure and milking characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 159169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, H., Schams, D., Prokopp, A. & Worstorff, H. 1984 a Effects of manual stimulation and delayed milking on secretion of oxytocin and milking characteristics in dairy cows. Milchwissenschaft 39 666670Google Scholar
Mayer, H., Schams, D., Worstohff, H. & Prokopp, A. 1984 b Secretion of oxytocin and milk removal as affected by milking cows with and without manual stimulation. Journal of Endocrinology 103 355361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, G., De Bruycker, R., Quintelier, W. & De Paepe, M. 1973 Contractions of teat muscles of lactating cows. Acta Endocrinologica Suppl. 177 50Google Scholar
Roets, E. & Peeters, G. 1985 Identification and characterization of 3H-prazosin binding to α1-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 275 189198Google Scholar
Roets, E. & Peeters, G. 1986 A comparison of the binding characteristics of the α2-adrenoceptor antagonists 3H-yohimbine and 3H-rauwolscine in bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 279 212222Google Scholar
Roets, E., Vauquelin, G., Peeters, G. & Braeckman, R. 1985 Homogeneity of β-adrenoceptors on bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 276 4449Google ScholarPubMed
Sambraus, H. H. 1971 [Rhythmic contractions of the bovine teat.] Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin A 18 335340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS, 1985 SAS User's Guide: Statistics Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schams, D., Mayer, H., Prokopp, A. & Worstorff, H. 1984 Oxytocin secretion during milking in dairy cows with regard to the variation and importance of a threshold level for milk removal. Journal of Endocrinology 102 337343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, G. H. 1971 Biology of Lactation. San Francisco, CA: W. H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
Vorherr, H. 1971 Catecholamine antagonism to oxytocin-induced milk-ejection. Acta Endocrinologica Suppl. 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, H. & Mosimann, W. 1960 Anatomie und Physiologie der Rindermilchdrüse. Berlin: Paul PareyGoogle Scholar