Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:51:36.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pre-partum feeding of heifers on milk composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. S. Foot ,
C. Line  and
S. J. Rowland
A. S. Foot
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
C. Line
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of the level of pre-partum feeding of Friesian heifers on the yields and composition of the milk in the subsequent lactation has been investigated using 23 heifers on each of 2 treatments. For 1 treatment, over a period of 6 weeks before calving, generous grazing on good pasture was supplemented with 8 lb/cow daily of concentrates, and for the other only restricted grazing of an already sparse sward was allowed.

For the period 3—8 weeks from calving the heifers fed at the high plane pre-partum produced significantly more milk than those fed at the low plane (36·8 compared with 31·9 lb/cow daily). The solids-not-fat (S.N.F.) and fat contents of their milk were also significantly higher (8·71 compared with 8·47%, and 3·72 compared with 3·38%, respectively). For the period 3—14 weeks from calving the effect of milk yield was slightly greater but the effect on composition was less. For the period 3—30 weeks from calving the difference in milk yield remained significant (31·3 compared with 26·1 lb/cow daily), but the average differences in S.N.F. and fat contents over this period (8·63 compared with 8·51%, and 3·75 compared with 3·59%, respectively) were not significant.

The heifers fed at the higher plane increased in liveweight before calving at a rate which was highly significantly greater than that of the heifers fed at the low plane. After calving, the heifers which had been on the higher plane remained almost constant in weight during the first 12 weeks whilst the others regained some of their losses, a difference which was highly significant. This recovery was apparently made at the expense of milk yield and composition.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , October 1963 , pp. 403 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1944). J. agric. Sci. 34, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). J. R. agric. Soc. 123, 7.Google Scholar
Bonnier, G. (1946). Kungl. Lantbr. Akad. Tidschr. 85, 221.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1951). B.S. 1741, p. 7.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1955). B.S. 696, Part 2, p. 7.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1958). N.A.A.S. quart. Rev. no. 42, p. 47.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Ridler, B. & Foot, A. S. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1956). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 18, 883.Google Scholar
Campbell, I. L. & Flux, D. S. (1948). Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 61.Google Scholar
Campbell, I. L., Flux, D. S. & Patchell, M. R. (1955). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 15, 132.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Watson, J. N. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1912). Bull. Mo. agric. Expt. Sta. no. 100.Google Scholar
Flux, D. S. (1950). J. agric. Sci. 40, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flux, D. S. & Patchell, M. R. (1954). J. agric. Sci. 45, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Sect. A, 35, 97.Google Scholar
Lees, F. T., McMeekan, C. P. & Wallace, L. R. (1948). Proc. Hth Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 60.Google Scholar
Patchell, M. R. (1957). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Sect. A, 38, 682.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. W. & Hinton, S. A. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1958). proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. Wk. p. 216.Google Scholar